Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil - 2020 fore sight

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 19:18:25

OutcastPhilosopher wrote:From Deagle:

In 2014 we published a disclaimer about the forecast. In six years the scenario has changed dramatically. This new disclaimer is meant to single out the situation from 2020 onwards. Talking about the United States and the European Union as separated entities no longer makes sense. Both are the Western block, keep printing money and will share the same fate.

After COVID we can draw two major conclusions:

The Western world success model has been built over societies with no resilience that can barely withstand any hardship, even a low intensity one. It was assumed but we got the full confirmation beyond any doubt.
The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through the so called Great Reset.

The Great Reset; like the climate change, extinction rebellion, planetary crisis, green revolution, shale oil (…) hoaxes promoted by the system; is another attempt to slow down dramatically the consumption of natural resources and therefore extend the lifetime of the current system. It can be effective for awhile but finally won’t address the bottom-line problem and will only delay the inevitable. The core ruling elites hope to stay in power which is in effect the only thing that really worries them.

The collapse of the Western financial system - and ultimately the Western civilization - has been the major driver in the forecast along with a confluence of crisis with a devastating outcome. As COVID has proven Western societies embracing multiculturalism and extreme liberalism are unable to deal with any real hardship. The Spanish flu one century ago represented the death of 40-50 million people. Today the world’s population is four times greater with air travel in full swing which is by definition a super spreader. The death casualties in today’s World would represent 160 to 200 million in relative terms but more likely 300-400 million taking into consideration the air travel factor that did not exist one century ago. So far, COVID death toll is roughly 1 million people. It is quite likely that the economic crisis due to the lockdowns will cause more deaths than the virus worldwide.

The Soviet system was less able to deliver goodies to the people than the Western one. Nevertheless Soviet society was more compact and resilient under an authoritarian regime. That in mind, the collapse of the Soviet system wiped out 10 percent of the population. The stark reality of diverse and multicultural Western societies is that a collapse will have a toll of 50 to 80 percent depending on several factors but in general terms the most diverse, multicultural, indebted and wealthy (highest standard of living) will suffer the highest toll. The only glue that keeps united such aberrant collage from falling apart is overconsumption with heavy doses of bottomless degeneracy disguised as virtue. Nevertheless the widespread censorship, hate laws and contradictory signals mean that even that glue is not working any more. Not everybody has to die migration can also play a positive role in this.

The formerly known as second and third world nations are an unknown at this point. Their fate will depend upon the decisions they take in the future. Western powers are not going to take over them as they did in the past because these countries won’t be able to control their own cities far less likely countries that are far away. If they remain tied to the former World Order they will go down along Western powers but won’t experience the brutal decline of the late because they are poorer and not diverse enough but rather quite homogenous used to deal with some sort of hardship but not precisely the one that is coming. If they switch to China they can get a chance to stabilize but will depend upon the management of their resources.

We expected this situation to unfold and actually is unfolding right now with the November election triggering a major bomb if Trump is re-elected. If Biden is elected there will very bad consequences as well. There is a lot of bad blood in the Western societies and the protests, demonstrations, rioting and looting are only the first symptoms of what is coming. However a new trend is taking place overshadowing this one.

The situation between the three great powers has changed dramatically. The only relevant achievement of the Western powers during the past decade has been the formation of a strategic alliance, both military and economic, between Russia and China. Right now the potential partnership between Russia and the European Union (EU) is dead with Russia turning definitively towards China. That was from the beginning the most likely outcome. Airbus never tried to establish a real partnership but rather a strategy to fade away the Russian aerospace industry. Actually Russia and China have formed a new alliance to build a long haul airliner. Western Europe (not to mention the United States) was never interested in the development of Russia or forming anything other than a master slave relationship with Russia providing raw materials and toeing the line of the West. It was clear then and today is a fact.

Russia has been preparing for a major war since 2008 and China has been increasing her military capabilities for the last 20 years. Today China is not a second tier power compared with the United States. Both in military and economic terms China is at the same level and in some specific areas are far ahead. In the domain of high-tech 5G has been a success in the commercial realm but the Type 055 destroyer is also another breakthrough with the US gaining a similar capability (DDG 51 Flight IIII) by mid of this decade (more likely by 2030). Nanchang, the lead ship of the Type 055 class, was commissioned amid the pandemic and lockdown in China.

Six years ago the likelihood of a major war was tiny. Since then it has grown steadily and dramatically and today is by far the most likely major event in the 2020s. The ultimate conflict can come from two ways. A conventional conflict involving at least two major powers that escalates into an open nuclear war. A second scenario is possible in the 2025-2030 timeframe. A Russian sneak first strike against the United States and its allies with the new S-500, strategic missile defenses, Yasen-M submarines, INF Zircon and Kalibr missiles and some new space asset playing the key role. The sneak first strike would involve all Russian missile strategic forces branches (bombers and ground-based missiles) at the different stages of such attack that would be strategic translation of what was seen in Syria in November 2015. There was no report that the Russian had such a capability of launching a high precision, multiple, combined arms attack at targets 2,000+ kilometers away. Western intelligence had no clue. The irony is that since the end of the Cold War the United States has been maneuvering through NATO to achieve a position to execute a first strike over Russia and now it seems that the first strike may occur but the country finished would be the United States.

Another particularity of the Western system is that its individuals have been brainwashed to the point that the majority accept their moral high ground and technological edge as a given. This has given the rise of the supremacy of the emotional arguments over the rational ones which are ignored or deprecated. That mindset can play a key role in the upcoming catastrophic events. At least in the Soviet system the silent majority of the people were aware of the fallacies they were fed up. We can see the United States claims about G5 being stolen from them by China or hypersonic technology being stolen by Russia as the evidence that the Western elites are also infected by that hubris. Over the next decade it will become obvious that the West is falling behind the Russia-China block and the malaise might grow into desperation. Going to war might seem a quick and easy solution to restore the lost hegemony to finally find them into a France 1940 moment. Back then France did not have nuclear weapons to turn a defeat into a victory. The West might try that swap because the unpleasant prospect of not being Mars and Venus but rather a bully and his dirty bitch running away in fear while the rest of the world is laughing at them.

If there is not a dramatic change of course the world is going to witness the first nuclear war. The Western block collapse may come before, during or after the war. It does not matter. A nuclear war is a game with billions of casualties and the collapse plays in the hundreds of millions.

This website is non-profit, built on spare time and we provide our information and services AS IS without further explanations and/or guarantees. We are not linked to any government. Take into account that the forecast is nothing more than a game of numbers whether flawed or correct based upon some speculative assumptions.

Friday, September 25th, 2020


My only comment is - is there enough oil to have a large conventional war? No... Will there be a war to get the last of the low hanging oil fruit... from easy targets - damn right.
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby REAL Green » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 19:28:16

warpig13 wrote:
OutcastPhilosopher wrote:From Deagle:
My only comment is - is there enough oil to have a large conventional war? No... Will there be a war to get the last of the low hanging oil fruit... from easy targets - damn right.


FYI, OutcastPhilosopher is a likely JuanP sock. Deagle old news and is a bogus anti-American example of unlikely events. This is typical out of JuanP.
realgreenadaptation.blog
User avatar
REAL Green
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1080
Joined: Thu 09 Apr 2020, 05:29:28
Location: MO Ozarks

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 20:14:32

Karle wrote:warpig13, thanks for putting this on the table. I agree with what you say but why not take it one step further?

Maybe it is like this:
The elite have watched and read about the financial crisis and peak oil for many years. They have gradually realised the results will not be positive for them no matter how much money they have.

The elite are dependent on the 99% because the elite are not able to maintain and repair their Lear jets to give just a simple example. They are not dependent on all of the 99% but on about the smartest quarter.

Watching things developing and occassionally reading here something from @shortonoil and taking some time to study the second law of thermodynamics, and seeing the 99% keep multiplying like rabbits the elite might have seen a point where they needed to do something. Namely

1) stop the masses from using resources the elite need for their survival. But forcing people to travel less, drive less and being jailed at home would have lead to a world-wide revolution. They must be scared to do all that voluntarily. A "deadly" global pandemic could be helpful.

2) Get rid of three quarters of the masses, the not too bright ones or the ones they consider a burden, like old and physically or mentally disadvantaged. A virus could be used to first get rid of the last mentioned. For the next stage they could target those stupid enough to wear masks, fall sick after some time and then are easy prey for the virus. And finally those stupid enough to accept being vaccinated with a hastily developed unproven vaccine which will kill many, always leaving the more intelligent ones at each stage.

Of course I am not serious. I am very sure that none of the elite would be so cruel and selfish. I was just thinking what if they were.


I think this has been in the planning for a long time... dot com crash enabled the CB's to lower IR's... this allowed shale oil and tar sands to be financially viable and postpone the decline in conventional oil. The invasion of Iraq and all the other middle eastern countries post 911 was clearly about securing oil... low IR's caused malinvestment and financialization of just about everything... queue the 2008 crash. Since then the system has largely been on life support whilst they get the remaining structures in place and here we are...
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby AdamB » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 20:25:49

warpig13 wrote:I think this has been in the planning for a long time... dot com crash enabled the CB's to lower IR's... this allowed shale oil and tar sands to be financially viable and postpone the decline in conventional oil.


So you are saying, when I was producing financially viable oil and gas from shale reservoirs back in the 80's and 90's, someone else was planning the dot com crash in order...that I would make money....before it ever happened? How does that work? Like one of those Back to The Future time machines?

warpig13 wrote: The invasion of Iraq and all the other middle eastern countries post 911 was clearly about securing oil...


So....how much of that oil did we secure, sell, and put into the US coffers?

Or by "secure" did you just mean, "invade a country to take the oil...and then not take any of it, but let the people of the country have it"?
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby AdamB » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 20:27:51

warpig13 wrote:My only comment is - is there enough oil to have a large conventional war?


Of course. It helps to be the world's largest producer of it obviously.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 20:31:42

careinke wrote:This video seemed germane to the thread: Pretty good explanation from a conservative/anarchtistic point of view.

TIMESTAMPS -
0:00 Intro
2:05 What is the Great Reset?
8:45 Economics of the Reset
11:38 Why now?
12:20 The plan for CBDCs?
18:21 Conclusion

Great Reset & CBDCs: The Global Elite's Plan!!:

[


Good video... Shame he hasn't caught on to the idea that the planet's resources are running out and this is the main driver.
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 20:34:48

REAL Green wrote:
warpig13 wrote:
OutcastPhilosopher wrote:From Deagle:
My only comment is - is there enough oil to have a large conventional war? No... Will there be a war to get the last of the low hanging oil fruit... from easy targets - damn right.


FYI, OutcastPhilosopher is a likely JuanP sock. Deagle old news and is a bogus anti-American example of unlikely events. This is typical out of JuanP.


OK thanks. I liked the article though.
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 20:37:57

AdamB wrote:
warpig13 wrote:I think this has been in the planning for a long time... dot com crash enabled the CB's to lower IR's... this allowed shale oil and tar sands to be financially viable and postpone the decline in conventional oil.


So you are saying, when I was producing financially viable oil and gas from shale reservoirs back in the 80's and 90's, someone else was planning the dot com crash in order...that I would make money....before it ever happened? How does that work? Like one of those Back to The Future time machines?

warpig13 wrote: The invasion of Iraq and all the other middle eastern countries post 911 was clearly about securing oil...


So....how much of that oil did we secure, sell, and put into the US coffers?

Or by "secure" did you just mean, "invade a country to take the oil...and then not take any of it, but let the people of the country have it"?


Sorry no time to reply to you.
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 20:40:46

Found this podcast interesting... He's the first to talk about previous metals in the context of oil and mining.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0AG17fNiQ4
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby AdamB » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 21:26:24

warpig wrote:
AdamB wrote:
warpig13 wrote: The invasion of Iraq and all the other middle eastern countries post 911 was clearly about securing oil...


So....how much of that oil did we secure, sell, and put into the US coffers?

Or by "secure" did you just mean, "invade a country to take the oil...and then not take any of it, but let the people of the country have it"?


Sorry no time to reply to you.


Indeed. :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have to admit though, unraveling your entire global conspiracy angle with a single obvious question you can't answer, that takes critical and objective thinking skills!!
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Mon 30 Nov 2020, 21:52:42

AdamB wrote:
warpig wrote:
AdamB wrote:
warpig13 wrote: The invasion of Iraq and all the other middle eastern countries post 911 was clearly about securing oil...


So....how much of that oil did we secure, sell, and put into the US coffers?

Or by "secure" did you just mean, "invade a country to take the oil...and then not take any of it, but let the people of the country have it"?


Sorry no time to reply to you.


Indeed. :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have to admit though, unraveling your entire global conspiracy angle with a single obvious question you can't answer, that takes critical and objective thinking skills!!


All you want to do is derail any conversation that states peak oil is here, it's not a good use of my time - I'm busy.
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby OutcastPhilosopher » Tue 01 Dec 2020, 10:50:42

REAL Green wrote:
warpig13 wrote:
OutcastPhilosopher wrote:From Deagle:
My only comment is - is there enough oil to have a large conventional war? No... Will there be a war to get the last of the low hanging oil fruit... from easy targets - damn right.


FYI, OutcastPhilosopher is a likely JuanP sock. Deagle old news and is a bogus anti-American example of unlikely events. This is typical out of JuanP.



A JuanP sock? LOL

You guys are seriously hilarious. I have no idea who JuanP is, except a fellow person on this board.
The hand that gives is above the hand that takes
OutcastPhilosopher
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri 06 Nov 2020, 17:39:05

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby OutcastPhilosopher » Tue 01 Dec 2020, 11:01:14

warpig13 wrote:
Karle wrote:warpig13, thanks for putting this on the table. I agree with what you say but why not take it one step further?

Maybe it is like this:
The elite have watched and read about the financial crisis and peak oil for many years. They have gradually realised the results will not be positive for them no matter how much money they have.

The elite are dependent on the 99% because the elite are not able to maintain and repair their Lear jets to give just a simple example. They are not dependent on all of the 99% but on about the smartest quarter.

Watching things developing and occassionally reading here something from @shortonoil and taking some time to study the second law of thermodynamics, and seeing the 99% keep multiplying like rabbits the elite might have seen a point where they needed to do something. Namely

1) stop the masses from using resources the elite need for their survival. But forcing people to travel less, drive less and being jailed at home would have lead to a world-wide revolution. They must be scared to do all that voluntarily. A "deadly" global pandemic could be helpful.

2) Get rid of three quarters of the masses, the not too bright ones or the ones they consider a burden, like old and physically or mentally disadvantaged. A virus could be used to first get rid of the last mentioned. For the next stage they could target those stupid enough to wear masks, fall sick after some time and then are easy prey for the virus. And finally those stupid enough to accept being vaccinated with a hastily developed unproven vaccine which will kill many, always leaving the more intelligent ones at each stage.

Of course I am not serious. I am very sure that none of the elite would be so cruel and selfish. I was just thinking what if they were.


I think this has been in the planning for a long time... dot com crash enabled the CB's to lower IR's... this allowed shale oil and tar sands to be financially viable and postpone the decline in conventional oil. The invasion of Iraq and all the other middle eastern countries post 911 was clearly about securing oil... low IR's caused malinvestment and financialization of just about everything... queue the 2008 crash. Since then the system has largely been on life support whilst they get the remaining structures in place and here we are...



One of the biggest reasons for 9/11 was explained by the group known as the Project for a New American Century or PNAC for short. They wanted to establish a new World Order that could only be brought about by triggering a "Pearl Harbor" like event in the US and have the US Military go in and take out Iraq, Lybia, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Sudan, China, and North Korea. Guess who belonged to the group? Donald Rumsfield, Dick Cheney, Dov Zakheim, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearle, Bill Kristol, and many more. It just so happens that all of these men came to power in the Bush Administration. The PNAC group published their ideas in 2000 and it just so happens that the new Pearl Harbor event happened on 9/11. Isn't that amazing? Not to mention that most of the members are also dual citizen Israelis and those that aren't are hardened Zionists. The US government is a ZOG full stop and it continues until this day with Donald Trump and it will continue under Joseph Biden.
The hand that gives is above the hand that takes
OutcastPhilosopher
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri 06 Nov 2020, 17:39:05

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby AdamB » Tue 01 Dec 2020, 11:24:32

warpig13 wrote:
AdamB wrote:
warpig wrote:Sorry no time to reply to you.


Indeed. :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have to admit though, unraveling your entire global conspiracy angle with a single obvious question you can't answer, that takes critical and objective thinking skills!!


All you want to do is derail any conversation that states peak oil is here, it's not a good use of my time - I'm busy.


Peak oil has been here before, the folks capable of reading a graph knowing this, those looking for phantazmagorical schemes to predict the end of the world notwithstanding. Like you. Go back and read the post I replied to, the one where you were cheering on another conspiracy nutter sock puppet. They didn't talk about peak oil either. Neither did you, other than to mention it as the cause for all the discussed nuttery. It is unlikely you know anything about oil, and the concepts related to peak, geologic, technological, economic or historical.

I would love to talk about peak oil, all day long. You can't do that. You just want it as a trigger for your doom fantasy league games.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby warpig13 » Tue 01 Dec 2020, 11:35:50

AdamB wrote:
warpig13 wrote:
AdamB wrote:
warpig wrote:Sorry no time to reply to you.


Indeed. :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have to admit though, unraveling your entire global conspiracy angle with a single obvious question you can't answer, that takes critical and objective thinking skills!!


All you want to do is derail any conversation that states peak oil is here, it's not a good use of my time - I'm busy.


Peak oil has been here before, the folks capable of reading a graph knowing this, those looking for phantazmagorical schemes to predict the end of the world notwithstanding. Like you. Go back and read the post I replied to, the one where you were cheering on another conspiracy nutter sock puppet. They didn't talk about peak oil either. Neither did you, other than to mention it as the cause for all the discussed nuttery. It is unlikely you know anything about oil, and the concepts related to peak, geologic, technological, economic or historical.

I would love to talk about peak oil, all day long. You can't do that. You just want it as a trigger for your doom fantasy league games.


Peak oil was 15 years ago... 'ish. The question is not when the peak was... it's what happens now. At what point does a diminishing civilisation critical asset cause visible problems to citizens of developed nations and how are the governments going to handle the situation..? We know there's no substitute for oil because of its density... NOTHING... technology will never replace energy... our world is so heavily dependent on it, it's going to shock the world. I'm not really sure what your point is... In short what is it?
warpig13
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2020, 21:54:47

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby AdamB » Tue 01 Dec 2020, 14:02:58

warpig13 wrote:Peak oil was 15 years ago... 'ish.


Sure. Here is a graph proving it. Oops.

Image

warpig13 wrote: The question is not when the peak was... it's what happens now.


See what I mean, about conspiracy nutters not being worth talking to about peak oil? Why you CAN'T talk about peak oil coherently? Apparently data just doesn't have much meaning to you, so you just make it up as you go along, and those of us who know better are only left with giggling about Happy McDoomers and how they make the entire Church look bad.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Peak Oil - 2020 fore sight

Unread postby Pops » Fri 04 Dec 2020, 09:47:33

warpig13 wrote:Why are you even here? - Rhetorical!

Of course it matters when CONVENTIONAL oil peaks... peak conventional oil has been offset by synthetic oil for some time...


So which is it? Either it matters or it doesn't.

Look, I began to prepare for peak 20 years ago. I bugged out to the sticks, acquired tools and learned lots of old skills because there was no "new" alternative to petroleum. 10 years ago I thought PO imminent and tight oil a scam, so I battened down the hatch and bugged in. 5 or 6 years ago tight oil showed me I was no Cassandra so I cashed out of the "homestead." It was a great plan for 2000 but the intervening 20 years have made a huge difference in what is possible.

It's much easier to be independent of the oil economy now. Something I assume you are working on. Today one can buy an EV and enough PV to drive it. Add pretty good, low maintenance battery capacity to bridge cloudy days. The Internet. Broadband, fibre optics into the sticks, wifi, 4G and soon Starlink! means working remotely with little effort. High efficiency appliances, HVAC, windows and tight building products & techniques mean I can build a more efficient house than 20 years ago.

The question to me has never been will there be a peak, or even so much when, but how can I prepare before preparing is no longer possible.


Civilisation is now about to change for the worse, because the planet is running out of its natural resources... We are now moving to a socialist world government where the remaining resources will be allocated centrally... our civil liberties have not been eroded - they've been smashed to bits and they're NEVER coming back. The democrats (the irony!) have just cheated Trump out of his presidency ...

blah

LOL.The reality of course is a rise in right-wing nationalism and digital gas-light as exemplified by, well, your post. This was to be expected in a resource constrained world, it's an extremely bad sign that we've gotten there before the constraints bite.

The supreme irony is that this ultimate human invention, the internet, that had the capacity to bring us all together and make us collectively wiser and more resilient, will be used instead to divide us with compelling ignorance, doctored videos and alternative facts

.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby Armageddon » Fri 04 Dec 2020, 10:05:33

warpig13 wrote:I think I've watched this 8 times... what an amazing video.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/VOMWzjrRiBg




Thanks for posting. Excellent video
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 04 Dec 2020, 21:49:04

warpig13 wrote:
AdamB wrote:I know quite a few answers. But the EIA has international energy statistics at the country level for past production, going back at least a few decades. A good website to have a shortcut for, when it comes to domestic or international oil and gas volume questions.


You like wasting my time... I don't. You're talking shit.


So....you don't have the brains, or the time, to check out documented oil volumes to verify the information provided? They add it up for you and give you a graph and everything...are you scared of using the web or something? Or just scared that your claim of peak oil in 2005 will be revealed as the crock I've already demonstrated?

And those timelines from those reports....where might they be? :lol: :lol:
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Peak Oil > Covid 19 > Great Reset

Unread postby coffeeguyzz » Sat 05 Dec 2020, 17:52:06

Pops
That is a great post that displays both honesty and strong character.
Regarding energy in general and hydrocarbons in particular, there looks to be an abundance/overabundance in both oil and natgas for at least the next ~20 years for oil, 100 years for natgas.

As far as unconventional potential goes, the technology and known resources favor Columbia (surprisingly) and the Bazenhov starting to incrementally show the world that this so called Shale Revolution is absolutely not limited to the US and Canada.
In fact, the experiences in the Vaca Muerta and China's Sichuan basins clearly show the negative impacts of political/social/economic factors that are all human injectedby players with various motivations.

Looking forward, the rapid advances in hydrogen-related adoption (key metric being <$1/kg production threshold ... already achieved in laboratory settings) and Small Modular Reactors using known nuclear technology that bypasses most of the economic and safety concerns associated with legacy nuclear production.

Your closing statements referring to global info dissemination directly addresses this irrational state of affairs as HIGHLY motivated players are effectively sowing confusion so as to further their own interests while kneecapping opponents.
These opponents include competing companies, technologies, countries, political/social entities, to name just a few.
coffeeguyzz
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon 27 Oct 2014, 16:09:47

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 111 guests

cron