Newfie wrote:Review of a new book with some good news. Fertility rates falling.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/202 ... 842950002/
Newfie wrote:Review of a new book with some good news. Fertility rates falling.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/202 ... 842950002/
JuanP wrote: this is way too little way too late. The Arctic is melting, Climate Change positive kickback loops are kicking in................
Pops wrote:So it is good news that sperm count is falling but not good news that women are getting more of a say in baby making (see the last 5 pages)?
Gotta be something there, I just don't know what. LOL
Pops wrote:So it is good news that sperm count is falling but not good news that women are getting more of a say in baby making (see the last 5 pages)?
Gotta be something there, I just don't know what. LOL
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
JuanP wrote:Everything that reduces population growth in a nonviolent way is welcome news to me.
aadbrd wrote:JuanP wrote:Everything that reduces population growth in a nonviolent way is welcome news to me.
Not just COVID if you accept Erin Brockovich's analysis.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -brokovich
I welcome our Children of Men future although I could do without being surrounded by soyboys.
Tanada wrote:Pops wrote:So it is good news that sperm count is falling but not good news that women are getting more of a say in baby making (see the last 5 pages)?
Gotta be something there, I just don't know what. LOL
Personally I think the "good news" would be exactly the opposite, women should have full access to birth control and the choice of using it or not, but a low sperm count is nothing to celebrate as it indicates very bad outcomes long term and is often a sign of environmental factors like endocrine disruption and so on.
Shipping rates for oil product tankers nearly doubled after the ship became stranded, and efforts to free the giant vessel may take weeks and be complicated by unstable weather, threatening costly delays for companies already dealing with COVID-19 restrictions.
At least 10 vessels designed to ship animals are parked near the shuttered canal, and several appear to be en route between Romania and Saudi Arabia, according to ship data compiled by Bloomberg. The ones departing the European country are likely carrying sheep, which Saudi Arabia purchases so that the animals can be slaughtered according to religious preferences. Those traveling the other direction could be empty vessels.
Newfie wrote:Nifty little article on sustainability
https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2020/8/10/i-did-the-math-on-my-towns-cul-de-sacs?
Forty odd years of road and utility construction tells me his figures are all wet. For one thing he uses a lifetime of a road as just 17 years but a well constructed street will only need a resurfacing of the pavement not a total reconstruction. Water and sewer lines often last 100 years as well. Then he seems to forget that in a half mile of road there will be at least a dozen houses sharing the cost of the street and the utilities depending on lot sizes and frontage lengths seldom more then 200 feet per house lot. And as there are houses both sides of the street each house only would have to account for half of the frontage length.theluckycountry wrote:Newfie wrote:Nifty little article on sustainability
https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2020/8/10/i-did-the-math-on-my-towns-cul-de-sacs?
Yikes! I always knew that suburban streets cost a fortune but that's beyond the pale.
"low density suburban living requires more roads, curbs, sidewalks, and pipes than it pays for in tax revenue—meaning, it’s not solvent."
They will just have to depave, no other solution to that equation. My small town, 3000 odd, has sprawled out into suburbs and acreage suburbs, the latter of which would make those equations look even worse.
The minor highway into town here had a particularly bumpy section and the main-roads rebuilt it, right down to the road base matting. It took months for only about 2 km of dual carriageway to be rebuilt and even then they left section of original roadway in between the new because it was relatively smooth still. Talk about cutting corners. I asked myself why it took so long. Money, or lack of it, pure and simple.
Return to Conservation & Efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests