Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Fri 30 Mar 2018, 15:31:40

The same carcinogen that was found and removed from potato chips years back has been found in coffee beans, and a judge has ruled that a warning must be posted where coffee is sold.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/starbucks-cancer-warning-judge-rules-on-coffee-carcinogen-acrylamide/

The substance (acrylamide) forms during the coffee roasting process, and is concentrated in the coffee oils. The roasting technique can make a difference, as the highest acrylamide levels were found in the classic drum roasters, and the lowest levels in the "hot air" roasters that minimize the transfer of oils to the roaster walls.

I am officially disturbed. I order coffee online but I have no idea what sort of roaster they use. I'm going to ask them via the online comment field when I place my next order.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 16:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 30 Mar 2018, 17:32:28

California already requires cancer warnings on gas stations,[16] hardware suppliers,[17] grocery stores, drug stores, medical facilities, and many other businesses.[18][19] Government agencies,[20] parking garages, hotels,[19] apartment complexes,[21] retail stores,[22] banks, and restaurants[23].


Image
California even requires a warning label on Disneyland.

Image
There are so many warning labels that it seems like everything gives you cancer. And that makes the warning labels themselves seem like kind of a joke.
The lack of speed has to go faster---Joe Biden
I will defeat Joe Biden---Joe Biden
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 23496
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 02:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Fri 30 Mar 2018, 18:32:13

It just shows you how stupid and ineffectual a government can be. How many less cups of coffee will Californians consume next month? Might even be an increase.
They are now training people to ignore the stupid government. Heaven help them if they actually need the population to heed and obey something much more important then the remote chance of getting cancer from a daily cup of coffee.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10851
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Fri 30 Mar 2018, 18:43:47

And then, there are all the claims and studies of how coffee is good for you.

http://time.com/5033881/health-benefits ... ng-coffee/

Without meaningful statistics, such claims (good or bad), it's, IMO, almost impossible to draw meaningful conclusions.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 8326
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 20:26:42

Re: California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby dissident » Sat 31 Mar 2018, 00:09:16

This is legislative onanism. Like the clowns who ban smoked meat products because wood smoke is pure cancer. That must be what killed off all the new world aboriginals....

None of these do-gooders have a single study showing the direct onset of cancer from coffee drinking. There are no such studies. A major problem is that academics love to study silver bullet mechanisms that make for sexy papers. They avoid, due to funding pressure associated with publish or perish, pursuing the multivariate chemical mechanisms that actually matter. Fruit have formaldehyde which gives carcinogenic formic acid after ingestion. Yet we do not actually have to worry about this and it is all the pesticides, fungicides and other human chemicals that contaminate the fruit that are the real issue. The coffee is a complex soup of chemicals that act like a system and one can't cherry pick a single species and claim it acts alone.

I bet the cups used to serve the coffee are more of a cancer threat than the coffee itself (assuming that other contaminants are not introduced into it during preparation).
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 02:00:00

Re: California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Sat 31 Mar 2018, 11:37:35

The more disturbing aspect IMO is a judge writing law from the bench. Perhaps not technically since CA does have such a GENERAL law. But by his PERSONAL interpretation he's is adding to the law. The bigger problem is that virtually everything folks in CA consume contain some amount of a POTENTIAL carcinogen. Including organic produce. Yes, organic produce. Look it up: it might be a totally insignificant amount be a totally insignificant amount but it's there.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11263
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 02:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby Subjectivist » Tue 10 Apr 2018, 19:26:03

The real problem is if everything causes cancer then nothing causes cancer, you can not live your life in constant fear and be a rational human being. Blaming everything for cancer makes all prior warning less and less significant as ach new one is added to the list.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
User avatar
Subjectivist
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 06:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: California to Require Cancer Warning for Coffee

Unread postby dissident » Tue 17 Apr 2018, 00:28:17

Subjectivist wrote:The real problem is if everything causes cancer then nothing causes cancer, you can not live your life in constant fear and be a rational human being. Blaming everything for cancer makes all prior warning less and less significant as ach new one is added to the list.


The problem is the spew of chemicals into the environment (including your indoor spaces and food) that were never there before. The world is not big enough that such spew gets infinitely diluted. We are now drinking pharmaceuticals in our tap water. Why are they not at the bottom of the oceans or oxidized into CO2? Life ain't so simple.

Health advice history from the US government has been a sad joke. Eggs are bad for you since they have cholesterol. Well, dietary cholesterol is a non issue. Those fat free cookies result in glucose, which results in triglycerides, which result in VLDL and then LDL. And HDL is consumed too. The fetish for polyunsaturated vegetable oils is predicated on the fact that LDL is used to compensate for the inferior fatty acid properties of such oils. This is part of the same "bleed the badness out" school as disrupting coenzyme Q10 production with statins to disrupt LDL production and increase its uptake. Bayer's failed Baycol product and its victims should be a lesson for what idiocy this is. But faith in government-corporate witchdoctor BS is unwavering.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 02:00:00


Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests