by evilgenius » Sat 22 Jan 2022, 08:18:22
It isn't just that crypto is another form of money. It is a form of money like gold, more a commodity, than actual money, I think. It's just that because crypto is digital, it can be parsed to ever smaller composing units, if you need a safety valve for large numbers.
Real money doesn't need that because the size of the money supply is dependent upon the level of economic activity within the economy. Money is created when people borrow in a fractional reserve banking system. The dynamics work over many competing sorts of theories, even the doubting ones.
Some people tilt at windmills, when they buy Bitcoin. They aren't too far off. Bitcoin is, as far as we are considering it for this conversation, mutually exclusive with current fractional reserve money. People are arbitraging their own personal Don Quixote and don't know it!
It's like wanting a gold standard. But gold standards are not for democracies. They are for empires, kingdoms or perverse governments. You need something like fiat money, that responds to the activity of the people, in a democracy.
Democracies cannot be based upon what is essentially gambling either. That wouldn't do. It would introduce such inherent instability to the whole concept of democracy that it would be too hard to pass information from one generation to another regarding how to govern. It would be a total disaster.
Yeah, it's probably perfect for some, the Ayn Rand types. They've never cared, if, to get what they want, a great boulder had to be set loose within the economy, destroying, crushing, who knows how many?
Hell, to them, that is just a thinning of the competition. And they do try to beat everybody economically like Alabama does opponents in football games, 65-0, or something like that. And people think income inequality is bad now?
Do you see how it would work? A crypto based economy could not contract, without confiscation. It's doomed to get too political, too fast. Because it's digital, you can't hide it from them. There probably is no 'democratic' algorithm enough people can accept. There would be classes, and trouble between them, built in.
You would always have a shifting power base. No one would be incentivized to do good to others. Everything would be short term, and personal. The economy would be constructed of rampant selfishness, much worse than the worst apocalyptic dreams of the debt super cycle people, really.