vision-master wrote:So we want the truth instead, eh?
How about we go back just 12,500 years. What do we find?
peripato wrote:vision-master wrote:So we want the truth instead, eh?
How about we go back just 12,500 years. What do we find?
A lot fewer people!
Serial_Worrier wrote:peripato wrote:vision-master wrote:So we want the truth instead, eh?
How about we go back just 12,500 years. What do we find?
A lot fewer people!
I want volunteers for "fine living circa 10500 BCE". Any takers?
anador wrote:You know there is a thing called craft vm?
I suppose the Pieta and the venus de milo are similarly made by some ancient super high technology civilization.
Just because the cheapness of the machine addicted present is all you can see does not mean that humans do not have the ability to create such art-works without machine intervention.
People have had thousands and thousands of years to learn methods of carving stone before this.
anador wrote:I am drunk..... but ad hominem aside you are an idiot
The "high-tech" involved here would be called "stencils" made of wood or papyrus. One stencil, a measuring tool and a straight string would serve to create for hundreds of standardized Images, which would be drawn on the stone with charcoal. Carving the stencils was done with copper and stone. I'm sure a lot of nasty inspectors made sure the other details like depth were correct, although even the image you show displays enough images to prove it's hand work.vision-master wrote:(Red Granite) - Obelisk at Karnak Temple
Carved with precision machine tools - how could this be, we were living in the stone age BC, no?
ian807 wrote:The "high-tech" involved here would be called "stencils" made of wood or papyrus. One stencil, a measuring tool and a straight string would serve to create for hundreds of standardized Images, which would be drawn on the stone with charcoal. Carving the stencils was done with copper and stone. I'm sure a lot of nasty inspectors made sure the other details like depth were correct, although even the image you show displays enough images to prove it's hand work.vision-master wrote:(Red Granite) - Obelisk at Karnak Temple
Carved with precision machine tools - how could this be, we were living in the stone age BC, no?
vision-master wrote:Show me comparable granite carvings done today with only hand tools. Remember, they only had copper and stone tools to work with and granite has a hardness of 8.
Also, tell me how 'they' carved out the bottom block - FYI: It's cut as smooth as a bathroom mirror. Explain how the 'back section' was cut out?
vision-master wrote:Ok, how did they cut, move and erect a 343 ton piece of pink granite?
Slaves, ropes and pulleys....
AgentR11 wrote:Of course, you leave out the one thing they did have that matters. Time. Oodles of it.vision-master wrote:Show me comparable granite carvings done today with only hand tools. Remember, they only had copper and stone tools to work with and granite has a hardness of 8.
You don't see such carving done by hand today, because the labor would cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars. If it cost you $5 for all that labor, you'd see it all over the place. Its not a technical challenge, its an economic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests