falser wrote:600 man hours sounds a little high. What is the official definition of a man-hour? One gallon of gas can move a 2000lbs car 25 miles. 600 hours = 25 days. I bet 3 people could push a car the same distance in a lot less than 25 days, probably more like 2 days (48hr) max. So my guesstimate would be 3 people X 48 hours = 144 man hours.
falser wrote:600 man hours sounds a little high. What is the official definition of a man-hour? One gallon of gas can move a 2000lbs car 25 miles. 600 hours = 25 days. I bet 3 people could push a car the same distance in a lot less than 25 days, probably more like 2 days (48hr) max. So my guesstimate would be 3 people X 48 hours = 144 man hours.
bobbyald wrote:1 Gallon = 132,000,000 Joules = 125,000 BTU = 36,650 Watt Hours = 31,000 Calories = 110 McD Hamburgers = .......
MD wrote:The future of America will feature the return of the 16 hour 6 day work week for the common laborer.
ohanian wrote:bobbyald wrote:1 Gallon = 132,000,000 Joules = 125,000 BTU = 36,650 Watt Hours = 31,000 Calories = 110 McD Hamburgers = .......
132E6 joules / 250watt / 3600 sec = 146 man hours
based on 1 man hour = 250 watt * 1 hour (3600 seconds)
UIUCstudent01 wrote:falser wrote:600 man hours sounds a little high. What is the official definition of a man-hour? One gallon of gas can move a 2000lbs car 25 miles. 600 hours = 25 days. I bet 3 people could push a car the same distance in a lot less than 25 days, probably more like 2 days (48hr) max. So my guesstimate would be 3 people X 48 hours = 144 man hours.
25 miles to me means just about a full day of walking (sunrise to sunset)... and on full day of walking (of hilly terrain) left me with calluses..
I've never pushed a car - so I don't know how much resistance there will be, but I assume it's considerable. I'm very sure 3 people wouldn't do it in 144 man hours...
Then there's the fact that you gotta eat + sleep + take breaks. It may not count - but it sure will double the amount the amount of time that it will take to complete a task.
(Of course this kind of talk is kinda meaningless - we have horses, donkeys and oxen or something to carry and push crap in the past. But, of course, not everyone can have one.)
kmann wrote:The important point is petroleum does a lot of work for us. And the question is what will we do when it's no longer obtainable.
thorn wrote:I'm reading John Howe's book End of Fossil Energy. I was just thinking about the energy equivalent of gas. He says that 1 gal of gas is equal to about 600 man hours (if I remembered right). Which at $3/gal is less than $0.01/ hour. Who would work for $0.01/ hour? That's amazing if you think about it. It does not seem like there is that much energy in a gal of gas. Makes you realize that we really are screwed!
turn74 wrote:thorn wrote:I'm reading John Howe's book End of Fossil Energy. I was just thinking about the energy equivalent of gas. He says that 1 gal of gas is equal to about 600 man hours (if I remembered right). Which at $3/gal is less than $0.01/ hour. Who would work for $0.01/ hour? That's amazing if you think about it. It does not seem like there is that much energy in a gal of gas. Makes you realize that we really are screwed!
thorn- What do you think of the book? I watched that video from that link you posted.
Thanks!
Bob
MD wrote:Start with the assumption that a man can produce 250 watts continuously.
Ludi wrote:MD wrote:The future of America will feature the return of the 16 hour 6 day work week for the common laborer.
Except there's no need to work that hard to provide for our needs, if we choose to work cooperatively. Though many people here seem to find the idea of cooperation so offensive that they would rather return to a feudal society than an egalitarian one.
Bandidoz wrote:MD wrote:Start with the assumption that a man can produce 250 watts continuously.
That's VERY optimistic! If you try using a pedal generator, or an exercise bike, you'll find that you can only continuously generate 100W.
You can do 250W in short bursts; you'd have to be extremely fit to be able to do that continuously. I'm not sure whether an Ironman triathlete could be able to maintain that power level.
Users browsing this forum: theluckycountry and 20 guests