Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 24, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific

Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific thumbnail

How do you get rid of hundreds of tons of highly radioactive water?  You dump it into the Pacific Ocean of course!  In Japan, the  Tokyo Electric Power Co. has made the “painful decision” to begin purposely dumping massive amounts of radioactive water currently being stored at the destroyed Fukushima nuclear facility directly into the Pacific.  This is being done even though water radiation levels near Fukushima spiked to a brand new all-time record high just a few days ago.  The radioactive material that is being released will enter our food chain and will potentially stay with us for decades to come.  Fukushima is an environmental nightmare that never seems to end, but the mainstream media in the United States decided to pretty much stop talking about it long ago.  So don’t expect the big news networks to make a big deal out of the fact that Japan is choosing to use the Pacific Ocean as a toilet for their nuclear waste.  But even though they aren’t talking about it, that doesn’t mean that radioactive material from Fukushima is not seriously affecting the health of millions of people all over the planet.

According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive water into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that for the foreseeable future we should expect another 100 tons of radioactive water to be released into the ocean every single day…

Tokyo Electric Power Co. began dumping groundwater from the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant into the Pacific on Wednesday, in a bid to manage the huge amounts of radioactive water that have built up at the complex.

 

The utility, which says the water discharged is within legal radiation safety limits, has been fighting a daily battle against contaminated water since Fukushima No. 1 was decimated by the earthquake and tsunami of March 2011.

 

Tepco said 560 tons of groundwater captured and stored before it entered reactor building basements was to be released Wednesday, using a bypass system that funnels it toward the ocean after checking for radiation levels.

 

Using the bypass, Tepco hopes to divert an average of 100 tons of untainted groundwater a day into the ocean.

Tepco is assuring us that the radioactive water that is being released is within “legal radiation safety limits”.

But this is the same company that could not tell us why radiation levels in water near Fukushima reached a new all-time high just a few days ago…

Radiation has spiked to all-time highs at five monitoring points in waters adjacent to the crippled Fukushima No. 1 power station, plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Friday.

 

The measurements follow similar highs detected in groundwater at the plant. Officials of Tepco, as the utility is known, said the cause of the seawater spike is unknown.

Three of the monitoring sites are inside the wrecked plant’s adjacent port, which ships once used to supply it.

 

At one sampling point in the port, between the water intakes for the No. 2 and No. 3 reactors, 1,900 becquerels per liter of tritium was detected Monday, up from a previous high of 1,400 becquerels measured on April 14, Tepco said.

 

Nearby, also within the port, tritium levels were found to have spiked to 1,400 becquerels, from a previous high of 1,200 becquerels.

So do you trust Tepco?

I certainly do not.

And this is not just a Japanese issue.  Radioactive material from Fukushima has literally been found all over the planet.  For example, a nuclear fuel fragment from Fukushima has been found as far away as Norway.

Once this radioactive material gets into the ocean and into our food chain, there is no telling where it may end up.

If the mainstream media really did care about “the environment”, they would be talking about this.  But instead, there seems to be a conspiracy of silence.  Just consider the comments that Martin Fackler of the New York Times made during one recent interview…

Yeah… it’s so hard in Japan to talk about the radiation issue, like how bad is it really… There is a sense that if you even talk about these issues, you’re hurting the poor people of Fuksuhima. Therefore, we shouldn’t talk about it. That’s just not right… The folks who don’t want us to talk about it are the government, because they don’t want to pay compensation… I feel like there is a lot going on in Fukushima that just doesn’t get talked about in the local media, not necessarily for government cover-up sort of issues, but self restraint or self censorship. Even papers that are pretty strong in their reporting on Tepco in some ways, like the Tokyo Shimbun, won’t talk about these issues because they’re afraid that somehow its unpatriotic to talk about radiation. There’s a lot of questions and issues that are not being talked about, and I think they should be talked and if there is damage to the people of Fukushima that’s the responsibility of Tepco…

And the U.S. media certainly doesn’t seem to want to talk about how radiation from Fukushima could be affecting the west coast of our country.

But the evidence continues to mount that something very unusual is happening.

Just consider what is happening to young sea lions along the coast of California

Sea lions are once again struggling to survive and are washing ashore, many of them pups dehydrated, malnourished and on the brink of death.

 

The year started off quieter than last year, and the Pacific Marine Mammal Center’s director of development, Melissa Sciacca, thought they were in the clear – until about a month ago, when the calls started coming in nonstop. The center, in Laguna Beach, is near capacity, with about 100 sea lions being treated so they can be returned to the wild once they are strong enough.

 

“We thought it was going to be a nice calm year; in the last month it’s just spiked,” she said. “The rescues just keep coming in at a steady pace.”

And as I wrote about just the other day, something is causing millions of fish to die in mass death events all over the globe right now.

Could Fukushima be a contributing factor?

A lot of people out there are attempting to downplay the impact that the Fukushima nuclear disaster has had on the Pacific Ocean.

I believe that this is a huge mistake.

Nuclear radiation causes cancer.

Nuclear radiation kills.

The total amount of nuclear material released from Fukushima just continues to increase and slowly accumulate in our food chain.  When these nuclear particles get into you, they can literally start cooking you from the inside out.  In a previous article, I included a quote from an opinion piece by Helen Caldicott that was published in the Guardian….

Internal radiation, on the other hand, emanates from radioactive elements which enter the body by inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption. Hazardous radionuclides such as iodine-131, caesium 137, and other isotopes currently being released in the sea and air around Fukushima bio-concentrate at each step of various food chains (for example into algae, crustaceans, small fish, bigger fish, then humans; or soil, grass, cow’s meat and milk, then humans). After they enter the body, these elements – called internal emitters – migrate to specific organs such as the thyroid, liver, bone, and brain, where they continuously irradiate small volumes of cells with high doses of alpha, beta and/or gamma radiation, and over many years, can induce uncontrolled cell replication – that is, cancer. Further, many of the nuclides remain radioactive in the environment for generations, and ultimately will cause increased incidences of cancer and genetic diseases over time.

Doesn’t that sound lovely?

And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has been getting into the seafood being sold in North America.

For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to Canada…

• 73 percent of the mackerel

• 91 percent of the halibut

• 92 percent of the sardines

• 93 percent of the tuna and eel

• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies

• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish

So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in Canada?

Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high school student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery stores for radioactive contamination.  What she found was absolutely stunning…

A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that her school science project would make headlines all over the world.  But that is precisely what has happened.  Using a $600 Geiger counter purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery stores for radioactive contamination.  What she discovered was absolutely stunning.  Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were made in China, tested very high for radiation.  So is this being caused by nuclear radiation from Fukushima?  Is the seafood that we are eating going to give us cancer and other diseases?

Why aren’t we being warned about this?

Earlier this year, a fish that was caught just off the coast of the Fukushima prefecture was discovered to have 124 times the safe level of radioactive cesium.

But virtually nobody in the mainstream media considers this to be important enough to talk about.

A lot of people seem to think that the Fukushima nuclear disaster is old news.  But in many ways the biggest problems for North America may just be beginning.  For example, according to scientists at the University of South Wales, the main radioactive plume of water from Fukushima has finally crossed the Pacific Ocean and is going to hit our shores at some point during 2014…

The first radioactive ocean plume released by the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster will finally be reaching the shores of the United States some time in 2014, according to a new study from the University of New South Wales — a full three or so years after the date of the disaster.

The following graphics come directly from that study…

Fukushima Radiation - University Of New South Wales

So as the main plume of nuclear radiation reaches our shores, what will that do to our wildlife, our fishing industry and our beaches?

And what kind of danger does this radioactive water pose to those living along the west coast?

These are very important questions, but unfortunately those in power and those working for the mainstream media don’t really want to talk about these things.

The Economic Collapse blog



14 Comments on "Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific"

  1. Kenz300 on Sat, 24th May 2014 5:45 pm 

    This nuclear disaster will continue to poison the environment for many decades to come…………….

    TEPCO and the government of Japan were not open and honest about this disaster from the first day.

    Chernobyl is still an ongoing disaster costing billions decades later. This disaster at Fukishima will also continue to cost billions and will continue to poison the environment.

    Nuclear energy is too costly and too dangerous to the environment. It is time to transition to safer, cleaner and cheaper alternative energy sources.

    ———————————-
    Fukushima, Japan Rebuilding Communities with Solar, Commits to 100 Percent Renewable Energy by 2040

    http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/05/fukushima-japan-rebuilding-communities-with-solar-commits-to-a-100-percent-renewable-energy-by-2040

    ———————————–
    Chernobyl: Capping a Catastrophe – NYTimes.com

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/04/27/science/chernobyl-capping-a-catastrophe.html?emc=edit_th_20140428&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=21372621

  2. Makati1 on Sat, 24th May 2014 7:42 pm 

    And the beat goes on…

    There are many articles about what is really happening, but you will never see them on US MSM sources. Cancer is good for the GDP. Death is good for the GDP. Eliminating seafood from your diet is NOT good for the GDP, nor is the fact that GE/Westinghouse wants to sell more death traps to the world and the US and this is very bad PR.

  3. Norm on Sat, 24th May 2014 9:16 pm 

    Cool. Tuna fish sandwiches, that glow in the dark.

  4. GregT on Sat, 24th May 2014 10:19 pm 

    I’m waiting with baited breath, to hear exactly how the Obama administration will be tied into this one………….

  5. northwestresident on Sat, 24th May 2014 10:40 pm 

    GregT — I’m sure our resident Obama-blamer will be along shortly to explain it to us.

  6. SilentRunning on Sat, 24th May 2014 11:21 pm 

    I’ve been reading these hysterical posts on Fukushima for literally years now.

    If they were ever slightly true – why aren’t we all dead yet? Why aren’t the Japanese islands devoid of human life?

    I read the article completely, and followed links – and I think Tepco is doing exactly the RIGHT thing to minimize the risk of further contamination – pumping ground water from uphill before it has a chance to enter the reactor complex and become contaminated…

    BTW: People in Western North America are still glad that the radiation “fall out” map that this website uses for this incident is A HORRIFIC FALSEHOOD.

  7. Beery on Sun, 25th May 2014 5:53 am 

    Clearly, what happened is that when Obama visited Japan last month, he forced the Japanese to flood the Pacific with radioactive water. Obama is Satan.

    Oh yeah, and he’s really really black too: totally the wrong color.

    It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out how Obama does it – all it takes is someone with a willingness to create facts to suit his nutty political biases.

  8. drwater on Sun, 25th May 2014 10:34 am 

    Aw geez. This is pure crap. Read the details.

    “Tepco said 560 tons of groundwater captured and stored BEFORE it entered reactor building basements was to be released Wednesday, using a bypass system that funnels it toward the ocean after checking for radiation levels.”

    This is EXACTLY what they should have been doing all along. They need to capture groundwater upgradient of the reactors BEFORE it gets contaminated and discharge it. This relieves the groundwater gradient and stops the movement of the contaminated groundwater to the ocean.

  9. David B on Sun, 25th May 2014 10:55 am 

    What kind of article would you expect from a site titled The Economic Collapse blog.

    Pumping out groundwater before it reaches the plant is a good thing, but you’d never know this from the title of this article.

  10. bobinget on Sun, 25th May 2014 11:04 am 

    SOLAR PANELS TOO CAN CAUSE HARM

    If one were to fall on a big toe, small children in vicinity will hear words not often repeated near
    swings and slides. PTSD?

  11. hculliton on Sun, 25th May 2014 3:43 pm 

    On the bright side, a substantial reduction in fish consumption might tale the pressure of the horrendously depleted fish stocks. Sadly, fishing is vastly more dangerous to the oceans than Fukushima.

  12. sjn on Mon, 26th May 2014 1:36 am 

    drwater, David B, that’s not the only information in the article. Coincident with the increased water discharge, the radiological contamination has spiked in the local sea water. Unrelated? Perhaps. Trust TEPCO?

  13. David B on Mon, 26th May 2014 7:47 am 

    They began pumping water May 21. The Tepco report showing record high tritium levels at two locations inside the harbor was released May 16. It’s funny that the article ask the reader if we should trust Tepco, when they’re using reports to make their case released to the public by Tepco.

    http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/smp/2014/images/2tb-east_14051601-e.pdf

  14. drwater on Mon, 26th May 2014 6:53 pm 

    “drwater, David B, that’s not the only information in the article. Coincident with the increased water discharge, the radiological contamination has spiked in the local sea water. Unrelated? Perhaps. Trust TEPCO?”

    If they are reporting what they are monitoring on the discharge water, then it would be easy to say one way or the other. Unfortunately, the article doesn’t give any monitoring results on the discharge water. I suspect the tritium concentrations are going up gradually because of ongoing movement of groundwater from the reactors to the ocean. I suspect if they had started using uphill interceptor drains/wells sooner, they would have much better control on groundwater movement.

    David B has a great point in that the report on the high tritium was from BEFORE they started pumping water, so pretty difficult to see a cause and effect there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *