Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on July 27, 2020

Bookmark and Share

Fighting Overpopulation: Ten methods to exterminate most of humankind

Fighting Overpopulation: Ten methods to exterminate most of humankind thumbnail


First of all, a disclaimer: I am not advocating the extermination of anyone! This post is just an attempt of mine to place myself in the boots of the bad guys who could think of doing such a thing and examine how they could do it. Could these scenarios occur for real? I don’t know but, as I say at the beginning of this blog, “always plan for the worst case hypothesis”

You know that there are people whom we call the “powers that be” (PTB) who can do things that we commoners can’t even dream of doing. Obviously, they can’t miss the fact that for decades the world’s best scientists have been speaking about a coming collapse of the global ecosystem, mainly because of climate change. So, would they act on this knowledge? And, if so, how?

Like everybody else, the PTBs think in terms of their personal survival and some of them reacted to the threat of the collapse of the ecosystem by buying desert bunkers and stockpiling food and weapons in there. But what if some of them decided to take a more proactive stance? When the PTB decide that something is to be done, they usually succeed by a combination of propaganda, money, and sheer force. Not being scientists, they may well reason in simplified terms: what is the cause of the coming collapse? Those pesky humans, of course. Then, an obvious solution is to get rid of most of them.

The bad guys who plan the extermination of humankind are a classic element of science fiction, but large scale exterminations are a constant of real history. So, what shape could a large scale extermination plan take, nowadays? In the following, I tried to provide an answer. I don’t know if I am evil enough for the task and, fortunately, I am not in the position to implement any of these plans. Also, I am sure I am teaching nothing to people who are much more evil than me. But here is what I came up with. The list doesn’t include ways to reduce natality, only straight extermination. The methods are classed from the least efficient to the most efficient.

1. Biological warfare. A much-touted weapon that never delivered the promises it made. It is very difficult to attack a healthy population with a pathogen sufficiently lethal to generate a true extermination. The recent Covid-19 epidemic shows the problem: it was highly contagious but not very deadly and, in the end, it caused very little damage. At the end of the current cycle, the number of victims will probably be around 2 million, but that’s hardly a way to exterminate humankind if you consider that every year in the world some 60 million people die. Then, there is a worse problem: even if a pathogen with the appropriate lethality and infectivity could be developed, how can the exterminators avoid being exterminated? They may have a secret vaccine, but vaccines are never perfectly efficient and pathogens rapidly mutate, making vaccines useless. Overall evaluation: It just doesn’t work.
2. Warfare. Wars can kill a large number of people but they normally stop short of exterminating whole populations. A state or coalition of states may wipe out the military forces of a less powerful coalition, but then the war is over and there is little incentive to keep killing civilians who are more useful as slaves than as cadavers. That’s why in history wars are associated at most with a short term drop in population sides. Besides, war is hugely expensive. You may use bullets, bombs, poison gases, or even just machetes, but you still have to manage armies, people, supplies, weapons, etcetera. All that just exterminate defenseless civilians? It makes little sense. Overall evaluation: too expensive

3. Mass Poisoning. Food or water poisoning is a time-tested killing method that can be applied at various scales. In the simplest case, you can drop some rat poison in your aunt’s coffee to cash in on her inheritance. On a larger scale, you could try to poison the food supply or the water supply of an entire country. The problem is how to do that without the targets reacting to the threat. That may not be difficult with an old aunt, not so easy with a whole country. One trick could be to use a slow poison that doesn’t kill before at least a few years. Indeed, much what people eat nowadays can be considered as poison: excess sugar, heavy metals, plastic microparticles, carcinogenic chemicals, and more. But most of these systemic poisons are too slow to be useful as mass-extermination weapons since they tend to kill people only after they had a chance to reproduce. Psychoactive drugs may do better, but they also tend to be too slow. For instance, in the case of heroin, perhaps the most powerful drug available today, the number of lost years of life expectancy for average users is around 18. So, if the life expectancy in the US is 79, it means that heroin addicts die at 60 on the average — not fast enough for meaningful mass extermination. We would need something like the fictional “Vibr” psychoactive drug invented by Antonio Turiel that kills users in five years. Such a drug doesn’t exist so far, but it may be possible to create it. If it were cheap enough, it would indeed be a weapon of mass extermination. Overall evaluation: promising but not yet practical 

4. Climate Weapons. Altering the climate can surely kill a lot of people and that’s exactly what the current global warming caused by human emission is geared to do in the coming decades. But this change will be long-lasting: we may not return to the pre-warming conditions before several tens of thousands of years have passed, and perhaps it will never happen. Can we think of something reversible that would leave a habitable planet to the survivors? An interesting possibility is of engineering a “volcanic winter” by spreading large amounts of dust in the atmosphere, blocking the sun and starving people because of the damage to agriculture. In principle, the dust would settle after a few years and the planetary climate would return to what it was before the dust injection, leaving a nearly empty planet to the survivors. This scenario could be created by lobbing nukes into active volcanoes. That would generate a very large amount of dust that would remain airborne for a time long enough to starve to death most of the human population, while the rich would survive in their well-stocked bunkers. The main problem is how to calibrate the dust-injection into the atmosphere. If you exaggerate, you may damage the ecosystem so badly that it will need millions of years to recover, and you probably can’t survive for so long in a bunker. Conversely, if the eruptions kill “just” a few billion people, the survivors won’t be kind to you when they see you emerging unscathed out of your bunker. Overall evaluation: tempting, but too risky. 

5. Weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). It is a very popular concept, but not easy to define. Apart from being used as a propaganda tool to demonize 2nd-rate dictators, what do we mean exactly with “weapons of mass destruction”? The answer seems to be weapons involving a large kills/cost ratio and that can be used on a large scale, the typical example is nuclear weapons. Apart from that, and perhaps radioactive poisoning substances, there is very little in terms of military technologies that qualifies as a true “WMD.” Poison gases are not large scale weapons and, as mentioned before, biological weapons are simply not effective. But nuclear bombs are true WMDs and there is no doubt that a large scale nuclear war would exterminate a lot of people. The problem is that, although these weapons in themselves are not expensive, the damage they do to infrastructures is gigantic, among other things making large areas uninhabitable for decades or even centuries — to say nothing about possible disastrous climatic effects. That’s not what a rational exterminator would want. Overall evaluation: may work, but it is too destructive.

6. Ethnic/political/ideological cleansing. It seems to be easy to convince people that their neighbors are evil because they speak a slightly different language, their skin color is slightly different, or they tend to eat disgusting stuff. Sometimes, it happens even without the need of a propaganda operation. The result is often the extermination of a minority singled out as “bad,” with the majority happily collaborating with the government in the task, or doing the extermination themselves. There have been many historical cases, the most recent one being the extermination of the Tutsi in Rwanda. Remarkably, that extermination was carried out by willing executioners who did the work for free and used weapons that weren’t more sophisticated than machetes. So, it is a very cheap method of getting rid of a large number of people. The problem is that, for obvious reasons, a minority cannot normally eliminate a majority. So, in history, the method didn’t normally result in an overall reduction of the population of the area where it was applied. Even the Rwandan disaster caused just a small bump in a population curve, that later on restarted growing. Overall evaluation: risky and not very effective.

7. Eugenics. Eugenic policies are not normally thought of as ways to exterminate large numbers of people, but that may well be their side effect. Typical methods used involve forced sterilization, but may arrive at the physical elimination of people judged to be a burden to society. In modern times, eugenics in the form of “involuntary euthanasia” was used in practice only in Germany, during the Nazist rule. The number of German citizens eliminated in this way can be estimated as of the order of 100,000, not enough to have an effect on the German population, and surely not an extermination method. But given enough time, the idea of getting rid of the useless people who are just a burden for society could surely be expanded and used for true mass extermination. Imagine laws that sentence everyone to death after reaching a certain age. So far they have been only described in fiction, such as in the 1978 movie “Logan’s run,” but fiction has a certain way to trickle into reality. Overall evaluation: a promising method, but not proven. 

8. Slaughterbots. Drones are the most fashionable weapon of our times and the concept of “slaughterbots” has been recently proposed: the idea is to build small and cheap drones that locate human beings and explode near their heads. Such small bots could cost no more than a smartphone and we know that more than 10 billion such phones were built since 2007. So, it would be reasonably possible to build several billion slaughterbots and spread them around the world. The poor would be the easiest to target, while the rich would be able to escape by having passwords to stop the bots, or simply hiding in suitable bunkers. The method has the advantage that the drones destroy themselves upon exploding, so you know that the number of victims would be limited to no more than the number of bots built. Is it farfetched? Not at all: killer drones are being built right now. So far, they are very expensive and the reported number of people killed is in the range of a few thousands, at least officially, far from being large enough to count as an extermination. But the cost per kill ratio could be greatly reduced, just as it happened for cell phones. Overall evaluation: very promising and already in progress. 

9. Famines. Famines are well-known mass killers. Perhaps the most interesting case is the Irish famine of the mid 19th century. The Irish population depended on a monoculture, the potato crop, and when it failed for a few years in a row, half of the population of Ireland was wiped out. Today, the world’s crops are not a monoculture and agriculture seems to be still able to produce large amounts of food. But the problem, as I described in a previous post, is not food production, it is food supply. The world’s food supply is vulnerable to a single factor: the globalized marine transportation system that carries food from producers to consumers and fertilizers and pesticides from the manufacturers to the users. If this system can be disrupted, the likely result will be that several billions of people would lose access to the supply of food and die by starvation. Wrecking the transportation system could be obtained by a war that doesn’t need to be very large, or even more simply by a downturn in the globalized financial system. In several respects, famine is the perfect extermination weapon. It costs little in comparison to its effects, it kills the poor while sparing the rich, it has long-lasting effects. It may not even need a specific intervention by the PTB, since it may develop by itself. Overall evaluation: Among the most effective methods available. 

10. Propaganda. “Consensus Building” (also known as “propaganda” or “psyops”) is a set of technologies that define the structure and the functioning of the Western society. Propaganda seems to be able to convince people of just about anything, so could it be used for depopulating a country? Of course, it is hard to convince people to kill themselves, but it was attempted at least once in history. During the last phases of WW2, the British diffused in Germany postcards, supposedly issued by the German government, with detailed instructions on how to hang oneself (coded H1321 and H.1380). Nobody can say if the several thousand German civilians who committed suicide before the arrival of the allied troops did that as an effect of the British pro-suicide propaganda, but it was an interesting first attempt. But propaganda can be used in different and more creative ways. Typically, people can be convinced to do something that’s contrary to their own interest if they are sufficiently scared that not doing that would lead to worse consequences. So, propaganda could convince most people in the US that a universal health care system is bad for them because it would be “communism”. Propaganda can surely be used to convince people to eat unhealthy food, use health-damaging medicaments, refuse life-saving cures, and more. All that is being done right now, but the scare tactics can be stepped up with more rapid results. For instance, some people were so scared of the coronavirus epidemic that they thought it was a good idea to drink bleach to fight it. This effect was probably not expected, but ways to obtain it on a much larger scale could surely be developed. Overall evaluation: Still to be studied, but shows great promise. 

And here we stand. After this exercise, I thought I would feel shocked just because of having thought of these ideas. But, really, I wasn’t. What you discover by thinking the unthinkable is that nothing is too evil that it wasn’t thought at some time in history, and sometimes put into practice. That’s especially the case of governments that seem to be the evilest organizations in human society. Also, I am not really worried that I could inspire someone into being more evil than they already are. So, I leave this text here as an exercise. Hopefully, none of these methods will ever be used, but the future always surprises you.

Cassandra’s legacy

4 Comments on "Fighting Overpopulation: Ten methods to exterminate most of humankind"

  1. DT on Tue, 28th Jul 2020 11:22 pm 

    The growing season being thrown out of kilter, as it is happening now, will most likely be the tipping point. Coming to a planet near you………”Death of The Food Chain.

  2. forbin on Wed, 29th Jul 2020 2:49 am 

    Well Famine works, War often leads to famine. Even CCP starved 30-66 million in the 60’s

    and you need the 5th Horseman , who everone forgets , Kaos .

    nothing like Kaos to disrupt things , works well with War, Famine and pestilence. Death just follows with his usual smile…


  3. peakyeast on Fri, 31st Jul 2020 10:56 am 

    He forgot the most normal and likely method:
    Continue human proliferation until all natural ressources collapse in a “reindeer island” apocalypse.

  4. suxs on Fri, 31st Jul 2020 11:26 am 

    Excellent point, peakyeast!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *