Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on August 29, 2017

Bookmark and Share

Arctic riches: A most insane discussion


As climate change rips away the icy armor of the Arctic, nations surrounding the North Pole and companies eager to exploit the area’s mineral wealth–particularly oil and natural gas–are growing giddy with anticipation.

So reports the Associated Press, though the AP is by no means the first to report this story. The slow-motion battle over the increasingly accessible resources of the Arctic is certainly a story. But the prevailing version of that story lacks the proper context, one that is hard to provide since the implications of global climate change are vast and difficult to grasp.

First and foremost, burning additional oil and natural gas made available by receding Arctic ice is nothing short of insane. But in a world that believes that adapting to climate change is merely an engineering problem, this type of talk persists.

Readers of the AP piece are told that those wishing to exploit the Arctic will have to build the necessary infrastructure to service the mining, fishing and tourism interests that want a piece of these boreal riches. (Yes, you read that right: tourism!)

But if development of the Arctic proceeds, it will be a sign that we are doing far too little to abate the very causes of warming that make such development thinkable. That would imply increasingly rapid climate change, something that will almost surely destabilize a world which wants to exploit the Arctic.

In a world plagued with agricultural areas devastated by flood and drought, coastal cities drenched by rising seas, mass migrations from newly uninhabitable areas, spreading tropical diseases, water shortages, and unimaginably long periods of intense summer heat, it is hard to imagine that nations and private companies will be able to provide the systematic focus on Arctic development needed to extract its wealth.

In short, the exploitation of the Arctic implies stability elsewhere; but a continuous rise in Arctic temperatures which will make such exploitation increasingly feasible implies the opposite.

We as a global society cannot seem to see the world in any other frame than that of imperial expansion with the Arctic as the next land to conquer–no matter what. (Outer space also continues to occupy our fantasies as a “next land to conquer.”)

The unfreezing of the Arctic may itself be one of the most dangerous drivers of climate change. The ice–which has prevented those currently salivating over Arctic riches from getting at them–not only keeps the Earth cool by reflecting light back into space; it also keeps untold gigatons of methane sequestered in the tundra and deep ocean. Once in the atmosphere methane traps far more heat than carbon dioxide.

Geologic history suggests that it is possible that a methane release from a melting Arctic would be non-linear (read: sudden and big). Such an event is often referred to as a methane burp. In the geologic past methane burps have been broadly fatal to all things living and may have led to one of the world’s six great extinction events. (The sixth extinction is currently in progress without so far the benefit of a methane burp.)

It turns out that what development of the Arctic implies is so catastrophic that it is hard to understand why we are even discussing it. I am reminded of an old New Yorker magazine cartoon depicting a speaker at a business conference concluding his talk as follows: “And so, while the end-of-the-world scenario will be rife with unimaginable horrors, we believe that the pre-end period will be filled with unprecedented opportunities for profit.”

Most people don’t really understand that a melted Arctic will almost certainly accompany the end of the world as we know it, both in nature and in society. Any profits gained as a result will be as monstrous as those mentioned in the New Yorker cartoon.

Resource Insight

12 Comments on "Arctic riches: A most insane discussion"

  1. Go Speed Racer on Tue, 29th Aug 2017 10:35 pm 

    All the displaced refugees,from tropical
    lowlands can be relocated to Antarctica,
    now that it’s thawing out.

  2. Lucifer on Tue, 29th Aug 2017 10:40 pm 

    Humans, eh?? Who would of thought greedy people would turn down an opportunity like that, even if it ruins the Earth even more.

  3. Boat on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 1:06 am 

    Why does anyone care about oil drilling away from where humans live. That would make more sense than drilling near towns and cities. Blame the demand you create yourself and please use a rubber to keep future demand down. Oil companies cannot fill demand that does not exist, in fact they pay extra for storage.

  4. onlooker on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 1:48 am 

    Oh what a fitting Irony. The cancern monkeys ie. us, rushing eagerly to the Arctic to get at the Oil/Gas. The same oil and gas that is instrumental to climate change. And in the Arctic which is ground zero for CC and heralds runaway global warming to create unlivable conditions for us. But by all means, cancer monkeys enjoy it while you can.

  5. on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 6:33 am 

    Humans do not have much control over nature’s cycles. It is insane to believe they do.

  6. jawagord on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 7:47 am 

    Interest in Arctic Oil and Gas is going down not up. See She’ll comment in story. Probably the same story for other mineral extraction as commodity prices are low and are likely to remain low for an extended period. Northwest passage shipping still a pipe dream, not happening in anyone’s life time.

    Shell relinquished most of its federal offshore leases in Alaska’s Chukchi Sea last year, after pouring billions of dollars into exploration efforts over the past decade.

    The rugged nature of the Arctic also slows development.

    “Think about a high mountain pass that is closed for half the year, has no gas stations, convenience stores or repair facilities,” said Andrew Kinsey, a senior marine risk consultant at insurance giant Allianz. “Is this the route that you want to use for your daily commute?”

  7. Sissyfuss on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 8:41 am 

    Where the carcass lays, the vultures will gather.

  8. paultard on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 9:18 am 

    siss darlin’ i’m thinking new thing in light of arctic reserves. this is where another front for conflict with putiin.

    love it. the possibilities for controlling siberia is endless

  9. Revi on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 11:38 am 

    They are already having conferences about the possibilities. Our representatives from Maine are excited about being the port in the US closest to the Eastern end of the NW Passage.

  10. Sissyfuss on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 1:48 pm 

    Paulywallytardamundo, what good is Siberia? It’s burning up, the permafrost is now tempfrost and there are exploding Methane butt holes everywhere. Maybe a good location for a Trump Tower but that’s about it.

  11. Cloggie on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 4:44 pm 

    Paulywallytardamundo, what good is Siberia? It’s burning up, the permafrost is now tempfrost and there are exploding Methane butt holes everywhere. Maybe a good location for a Trump Tower but that’s about it.

    Paultard wants women to combat permafrost.
    Women are very good at permafrost, especially when they have their period.

  12. Tom on Wed, 30th Aug 2017 6:23 pm 

    By 2040, Global Oil Demand will be 125 Million BBLs/Day.

    When depletion of current production is taken into consideration, that gives us about 25 years to find 5 (five) new Saudi Arabia’s worth of production.

    Where does these author suggest that we look for 5 new Saudi Arabia’s that have not already been discovered if we don’t look in the Arctic?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *