Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on May 25, 2012

Bookmark and Share

The rise of re-use

The rise of re-use thumbnail

Last week I read that the glitzy world of virtual reality created instant multi-millionaires and several billionaires when Facebook went public selling shares.

Last week I also noted the important real world problem of some 250 million tons of solid waste a year in our country alone.

Guess which “world” gets the most investment, status, fame, klieg lights, and attention of the skilled classes and the power structure?

Guess which world is more important for our wellbeing and that of the planet?

You’ve heard of CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook’s 900 users exchanging gossip and other personal pleasantries or worries through a medium that inflates narcissism.

The three Rs

You’ve probably not heard of Ben Rose of the New York City Materials Exchange Development Program (NYC MEDP) or the equivalent organizations in your communities providing services to thousands of charitable non-profit groups which promote the donating and reusing of materials to avoid incineration, landfilling and recycling.

To grasp the enormity of modern society’s waste products, Ann Leonard created a sparkling website, visited by millions of people ( She also published a recent popular book titled The Story of Stuff that details every aspect of your environment and physical being. Air, water, food, soil and even your genes absorb the byproducts of processing mountains of stuff. The results are not pretty.

While recycling efforts in cities like San Francisco, Vancouver and Los Angeles rise above 50 percent, New York City has been slipping behind its own 2002 level and is still struggling to reach 20 percent. New York City has been a leader in improving air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but it still has dreaded incinerators producing toxic air and toxic residues.

In the early 90s, pragmatic environmental scientist, Professor Barry Commoner demonstrated in two operational pilot projects that the city could reach a residential recycling level of nearly 100 percent. Unfortunately, New York City missed a chance to become a world leader in recycling when its leaders, beginning with Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, declined to establish a city-wide recycling program based on Professor Commoner’s model.

The New York City recycling challenge still hasn’t recovered from that devastatingly wrongheaded decision. Politicians and corporations cannot stop an even superior environmental cycle, presently driven by charitable associations, in Mr. Rose’s words, “nimbly accepting, exchanging and distributing thousands of tons of reusable material each year,” as they have done for generations, “all the while contributing to the social, economic and environmental fabric of New York City.” Over the decades, the recipients have been communities in need, such as homeless shelters and poor populations.

The NYC Materials Exchange Development Program now sees a great potential to “organize, grow and advocate for the practice of donating and reusing materials for the benefit of all New Yorkers,” creating local jobs and adding productivity without any tax dollars. They are rediscovering the past of a thrifty culture and expanding it mightily to contribute to the neighborhood and economic landscape.

Donating materials instead of trashing or recycling them enlarges the gifting culture and the beneficial human interactions that follow. As Ben Rose notes: “In contrast to recycling, where used materials are broken down into their raw elements to make new items, reuse takes useful products and exchanges them without reprocessing, thus saving time, money, energy and valuable resources.”

Battling manufactured obsolescence

The obstacles are obvious. First a throwaway economy of waste is profitable for sellers who want you to keep throwing away and buying. They plan product obsolescence and lure consumers with the convenience of disposable products. So we have to change habits: become more cunning about what manufacturers and vendors are up to and expand second hand, reuse and material exchange programs.

What are reusable materials? Just about everything you purchase that doesn’t spoil or perish. Clothing, furniture, books, bicycles, containers, computers, tools, surplus construction materials and things you buy or grow that you do not use. Reuse outlets include Goodwill or Thrift stores, charitable book and clothing drives, ecology centers and creative arts programs.

Nothing less than a “New Age” for a burgeoning sub-economy of reusable products and materials is being envisioned by the collaborative likes of the New York City Sanitation Department and the City College of New York’s Department of Civil Engineering. Collecting data which shows how much energy is saved, how many jobs can be created, how much better pricing systems can be, and how much solid waste can be prevented will elevate this subject and its social status within the “zero waste” movement. We should aspire to using resources, in the worlds of Paul Hawken, “10 to 100 times more productively.”

Other countries are advancing in the reuse sector in ways we can learn from immediately. Holland is starting numerous “Repair Cafes,” that are attracting increasing interest in “fixing” rather than dumping. These used to be called “Fix-It Shops” in the U.S. before the advent of our throw-away corporate culture.

For more information visit (

– Ralph Nader, the Nader Page.

6 Comments on "The rise of re-use"

  1. Norm on Fri, 25th May 2012 2:18 pm 

    Interesting ideas, ‘Repair Cafe’ might make sense for some items. This article misses an important angle, that a lot of the garbage, really is garbage (not useful for anything). That stuff can then be taken apart and the metals recycled. Even amongst hard-core liberals who proclaim ‘greener than thou’ seldom have I ever seen one of those greener than thou’s dismantle an old appliance to take out the copper & steel, nor have they ever gone to a metal recycler once they have accumulated enough to fill the pickup truck. Good habit to have, and its starting to be called ‘Resource Recovery’. That is actually the most important activity IMHO and if you do it, then you have far less trash. This could be done on a massive scale (if society wanted to provide jobs and conserve resources, which actually society wants to do neither). May I recommend setting aside a corner of a garage, and reclaim metals, by doing the work. Take a few minutes a day to recycle objects that are in fact trash. Amazing how much less trash is left behind after that. Point is, you cannot reuse and fix everything, but you can break it down to basic metals its just that almost nobody does that.

  2. BillT on Fri, 25th May 2012 2:49 pm 

    Take time this holiday weekend to watch this video…new, international hit. It starts by laying the groundwork for the last half of the movie, so hang in there until it gets to the heart of the matter.


    I think you will agree that it was time well spent.

  3. DC on Fri, 25th May 2012 4:03 pm 

    While I am in 100% agreement with the premise of the 3R’s, there is a huge, and I do mean huge problem with the idea. And its not thats is a bad idea, or wont work, nothing like that at all. The article itself nails it by talking about the obstacle

    manufactured obsolescence

    You see, the problem is virtually all the crud being ‘sold’ to us these days is so shoddy and flimsy, 3R ing itself is virtucally impossible in any meaningful way. Small items are designed to not be economically viable to repair-only thown away. Replacment parts for sub-assembies are either not aviailble or cost more than the entire item in question does let alone paying someone to do the actual work. Larger items, same idea. Nothing we build is designed to last, and maintaining and forcing poorly designed trash to actually keep working for extended periods, while possible, ends up being very costly. Cars are a perfect example of this problem. Keeping them arond longer than the car-capitalists want you do IS doable, but only at ever increasing cost and energy requirements. Thats how the industrial death economy screws everyone.

    I have very few items that have lasted over time, my bike noteably, and I have a telephone that I bought in the late 80s, still looks good and works fine. Northern Telecom actually built pretty stuff it seems. I have a few other items that have lasted, but most just fall apart and cant be repaired, or reused for much of anything. If your lucky enough to have household goods that can be repaired, Keep em, im finding durable well built goods that actually last to be worth there weight in gold these days, far more than the ‘latest’ I-shyte or w/e garbage people value so much.

  4. Max Reid on Fri, 25th May 2012 4:45 pm 

    The usage stuff can be dropped in Goodwill Stores / Salvation Army while the waste stuff like milk cans, soda bottles can be dropped in recycle bins.

    Now a days, in our apartment, the recylcle bins are getting filled faster than trash bins. Along with the trash bin, keep another bin for dumping recycled product, every 1 or 2 days dump those things in recycle bin into the public recycle bin.

  5. BillT on Sat, 26th May 2012 4:43 am 

    If you want to see ‘reuse’, come to the Philippines. They are masters of recycling, repair and reuse of just about everything.

  6. Kenz300 on Sat, 26th May 2012 1:58 pm 

    Biofuels can now be made from waste or trash. Every landfill can now be converted to produce biofuels, energy (methane) and sorted, recycled raw materials for new products. The raw materials are already being collected so they provide inexpensive inputs to the process. This is a more sustainable process that can produce local energy and local jobs. It is time to see trash or waste as a resource that should be properly utilized.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *