Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 29, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Is Canada Putting Too Many Eggs In Its Oil Basket?

Canadian Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said natural resources are the cornerstone of the federal and provincial economies. The U.S. economy, on the road to modest recovery, remains central to a Canadian oil market that relies heavily on exports. Oliver said at an investment conference in Quebec that the natural resources sector represents about 20 percent of the gross domestic product.  The Canadian economy has suffered, however, because there aren’t many new conduits to get oil exports to foreign markets. The potential to reach Asian could provide a relief valve for the Canadian economy, while the option still exists to ship oil through the United States for exports. With opposition mounting along the borders, however, Canada’s export-driven economy may become landlocked.

“Our natural resources are one of the cornerstones of the economic development of Quebec and Canada,” Oliver said.

Oliver said the natural resources sector accounts for about 1.6 million Canadian jobs and represents about one-fifth of the GDP. Canada is in the top tier in terms of oil production. Nearly all of its oil exists in so-called oil sands and the federal government now controls enough of that type of crude to put Canada behind Saudi Arabia and Venezuela globally. Most of the economy is structured around oil exports and almost all of those exports are directed toward U.S. refineries. Oliver said that could change, however, given growing demands from the Chinese and Indian economies, which could represent a new opportunity for Canada.

Pipeline company Enbridge is pressing for its Northern Gateway project to deliver oil from Alberta province west to ports in British Columbia. Kinder Morgan, meanwhile, is looking to double what it already sends through its Trans Mountain pipeline, meaning about 890,000 barrels of oil per day could be ready for Chinese and Indian economies at Vancouver ports. The provincial government in British Colombia, however, has balked at the idea that its pristine coastal vista could feature oil tankers along the horizon. Without those pipelines, at least a few of Oliver’s cornerstones won’t hold their load.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said during a recent visit to the United States that the key talking point on oil was whether to ship it by rail or by pipelines. He was speaking in defense of the Keystone XL pipeline, a project that’s been the source of controversy for at least four years running. Last week, the U.S. State Department published its first batch of the estimated 1.2 million comments received so far on its draft review of the project. That review said rail should be considered when weighing the project’s national interests. Rail deliveries of crude oil in the United States are accelerating at a steady clip in order to keep up with the U.S. oil boom. Canada hasn’t yet felt the impact of U.S. oil production gains, though U.S. crude oil production is expected to outpace imports later this year. By the end of next year, oil production in the United States will be at its highest level in more than 25 years.

Oliver said natural resources are the “key driver” to the Canadian economy, though that driver may be running out of energy. The government reported GDP expanded by 0.3 percent in February on the back of growth in the oil and natural gas industries. That growth is at risk, however, because suppressed oil prices are starving the provincial and federal economies. Last week marked the third straight week that the Canadian dollar weakened against the U.S. currency. Pipelines like Keystone XL and Northern Gateway could help Canada’s cause in the long term. Opposition to those projects, and growing interest in renewables, leaves the Canadian economy vulnerable, however. The Canadian federal government has built an economy that depends on foreign markets. Without the means to access those markets, however, Canada may find itself landlocked and isolated from the changing global energy market.

OilPrice.com



6 Comments on "Is Canada Putting Too Many Eggs In Its Oil Basket?"

  1. Arthur on Wed, 29th May 2013 12:01 pm 

    Canada has endless territory to generate energy from wind and geothermal and even solar [*] and endless mountains to store excess energy.

    [*] – northern Scotland = south tip Greenland icecap; Montreal = Venice/Italy, that is way below world record holder solar Bavaria/Germany.

  2. Kenz300 on Wed, 29th May 2013 2:34 pm 

    The price of oil, coal and nuclear keeps rising and causing environmental damage.

    The price of wind and solar keeps dropping and its safe and clean.

    Fossil fuels will be around for some time but their advantage is dwindling as their costs continue to rise.

    Quote — ” Renewables are becoming too competitive for fossil fuels.

    Forbes has quoted Rick Needham, director of energy and sustainability at Google saying, “While fossil-based prices are on a cost curve that goes up, renewable prices are on this march downward.” That pretty much sums it up. In just the last five years, solar photovoltaic module prices have fallen 80 percent and wind turbines have become 29 percent less expensive. Moreover, after the initial investment, renewables such as wind and solar, having no cost of fuel, will prove far too competitive for fossil fuels no matter how cheap those may appear to be. Cheap fuel is still more than free fuel.”

    ———————-

    STORY: The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels

    http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/05/the-economic-case-for-divesting-from-fossil-fuels?page=2

  3. BillT on Wed, 29th May 2013 3:15 pm 

    Canada is down to burning the furniture to keep warm. Next comes the siding on the house and the roofing. They are following the US down the sewer. Sell all of your resources to others and then do without when the crunch comes, and it will come for the US and Canada soon. It is already happening to Mexico.

    Let them build their pipelines through their own country to the coast if they want to profit so badly. Not through the US to the ports bound for China.

  4. DC on Wed, 29th May 2013 6:20 pm 

    If you are referring to the popular notion in Canada that ‘we’ should build piplines to Ontario instead of the US and refine it at ‘home’, well, I have some news for you, and for the huge #s of amazingly ignorant Canadians that find this argument attractive.

    You see, all those refineries in Ont. that the tar-sands fence sitters want to pipe it to, are amerikan(or foreign) owned. Yup, Esso, Koch Bros, Shell, Chevron. They own those as well. Piping it to somewhere in Canada(east) would achieve absolutely nothing because Canada does not control its own resources. The US does, thanks to NAFTA and the Harper Regime and its predecessors.

    Bottom line is, there is no ‘Canadian’ place to ship that tar too for processing, even if we felt like it, which, we clearly do not.

  5. SOS on Wed, 29th May 2013 9:44 pm 

    Canada is so lucky to have those vast resources, and so are we. Their energy reserves are a bleasing to the human race. They will help alleviate poverty and hunger. Renewables, such as they are – ecat, wind, solar, fusion – are a dream not yet realized. The true blessing for America would be to have the government get out of the way and let the energy flow.

    They arent burning any furniture in Canada unless they are stupid, they are celebrating enormous oil/mineral wealth that helps subsidize their huge social welfare programs.

    Anybody that wants the government to support them should be a huge fan of oil/gas/shale/coal. All of those resources represent direct wealth and there would certainly be enough for any welfare wannabes.

  6. BillT on Thu, 30th May 2013 3:25 am 

    Metaphor, SOS. They are destroying their homeland for profit. That tar should stay right where it is, underground and out of the air. But then you are one of those greedy petroholics that see the end of the gravy train ahead.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *