Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on March 16, 2012

Bookmark and Share

The sinking of the E-Cat

The sinking of the E-Cat thumbnail

It was Captain Kirk of the starship “Enterprise” who said that it is not a good idea to put oneself in a no-win situation. Good advice that was not taken by Mr. Andrea Rossi, inventor of the “E-Cat,” the cold fusion device that he claimed to be able to solve the world’s energy problems. After having been unable to show that his device produces energy, Mr. Rossi stated that he didn’t need any more tests because he could now proceed to market it in millionsof pieces. But, in reality, Mr. Rossi had simply placed himself in a no-win situation. The E-Cat is now fast sinking, hit by the contradictions of its inventor.

Let’s start with what Rossi himself had declared about his E-Cat. He said that it is based on the nuclear fusion of hydrogen and nickel nuclei (see Rossi’s patent) and that gamma rays are produced during operation (seehere) so that lead shields had to be placed inside the device. Rossi also said that he was building a factory in the United States where he would produce E-Cats by the millions to be sold as water heaters for people’s homes. According to some recent statements by Rossi, the device had been undergoing safety testing for months at Underwriters Laboratory.
It couldn’t go unnoticed in Florida that someone was claiming to be producing nuclear reactors in large numbers. On February 24, an officer of the State of Florida Bureau of Radiation Control went to investigate what was going on in the pretended “E-Cat factory” in Miami. There, he found no factory, but an apartment and Andrea Rossi in person. Questioned on the E-Cat, Rossi declared that “no nuclear reactions occur inside the device.” Rossi also stated that all the facilities for testing and production are “overseas,” and that safety certification with Underwriters Laboratory will be arranged in the future. The officer then left, writing in his report that his bureau has no jurisdiction over a device which has nothing nuclear inside. (The complete documentation is here, comments can be found here and here. Rossi himself confirmed the story¬†here.)


No matter how we want to see this story, it is clear that Rossi has been victim of his own “no-win” strategy. First, he claimed that he had developed a nuclear device, but he never couldn’t provide convincing proof. So he said that he didn’t need proof because he could just produce and sell the device – the market would judge it. But if he wanted to produce and sell the device, then he would have to obtain the necessary certifications. And how to obtain the necessary certifications after having declared that the device is based on nuclear reactions and it emits gamma rays? Surely, Rossi’s word is not enough to prove that shielding with lead foil is sufficient to remove gamma rays. Maybe there are arcane reasons (as claimed in this paper) that reduce, or even eliminate, gamma ray emission. But just the possibility of such an emission would required extensive investigations and years of work. So, you see? If it is nuclear, Rossi can’t sell it. If it is not nuclear, who would buy it? A classic no-win situation.

In the end, lacking experimental proof, the idea that the E-Cat produces energy rests only on Rossi’s statements that say, basically, just “trust me”. But after the Florida story, it is clear that this is, also, a no-win strategy. How can you trust Rossi after so many contradictions? Where is the E-Cat factory that he said was in the US and then, no, it is overseas? Most likely, there isn’t one. And where is the safety testing (not) being done? Incidentally, if, hypothetically, the E-Cat were really producing nuclear reactions, we should think of Rossi as a dangerous criminal who lied to the Florida officer about his plans to produce and sell a device that generates gamma rays without the necessary safety certifications. That Rossi can’t be trusted has been clearly perceived also by Rossi’s supporters, who have been abandoning the sinking ship: for instance Sterling Allan. The University of Bologna had wisely disengaged from Rossi already in January.

So, the E-Cat has reached the end of the line. It still maintains some faithful supporters, but, most likely, it will soon fade away in the darkness of pathological science, where it belongs. There remains a question: how is it possible that so much time and energy has been lost in this incredibly story?  Well, there has to be something wired wrong in the human mind but, at least, from this story we can learn what mistakes we should avoid. As Captain Kirk said, never put yourself in a no-win situation by believing without proof in salvific inventions.

Cassandra’s legacy


4 Comments on "The sinking of the E-Cat"

  1. BillT on Sat, 17th Mar 2012 1:31 am 

    Nothing more than a conman looking for suckers to make him wealthy. The gadget he wanted to sell is worthless as is any ‘energy from nothing’ idea. But, there are always a few fools who will believe anything because they want to and not because it is possible. Look at all of the Peak Oil deniers who want to believe that their wasteful lifestyle is never going to end.

  2. Jeff on Sat, 17th Mar 2012 3:50 am 

    Sounds like another oxyhydrogen (water)-powered vehicle, where a crackpot adds water to a tank but never uses water from the tailpipe as that would make it an obvious perpetual motion machine.

  3. Zephir on Fri, 23rd Mar 2012 1:13 am 

    Andrea Rossi COP ~ 6 doesn’t differs very much from COP ~ 3, reported with Piantelli and Focardi during last twenty years or COP ~ 10, demonstrated at MIT already. Everything vents normally.

  4. lucy on Tue, 27th Mar 2012 2:17 pm 

    Oil people think they are “winning” because Americans are addicted. You keep grinding down any emerging alternative so you can keep the masses in a losing position. So you guys are into “win lose”, ie. you win we lose. Oil will never provide a win-win situation like new technologies will. In any win-lose situation, the winner ends up losing in the end. Just look at the faces of those oil execs, ugly unhealthy unhappy stressed out people. I’ll go with people like John Searle, Andrea Rossi, John Bedini, and Nassim Haramein, over all you grumpy miserable sods any day. I WIN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *