Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on August 14, 2019

Bookmark and Share

How serious are oil and gas companies about the energy transition?

How serious are oil and gas companies about the energy transition? thumbnail

New energy’s time has come. It’s less than four years since the Paris Agreement set the long-term goal to limit the rise in global temperature to well below 2°C. Back then, the oil and gas industry had zero appetite to invest in decarbonisation. Paris lit the fuse. I caught up with Valentina Kretzschmar, Research Director, to find out what’s happening.

How serious are oil and gas companies about decarbonisation?

It now sits at the very centre of the strategic debate. The disruptive threat from zero-carbon technologies like electric vehicles may be some time off – we think peak oil demand isn’t until 2036. Meanwhile, government pressure is ramping up. The UK’s new target for net-zero emissions by 2050 is just the start. More immediate is investor agitation, pressing boards to address carbon emissions and build a sustainable business model. The sector’s share of global stock market indices has halved in a few years. The challenge is to stay relevant and investable.

Who is doing most in the space?

European Majors are leading, though strategies vary. Total and Shell have gone further than the rest in increasing exposure to renewables and other clean technologies, but Shell is out on its own in laying out a net-carbon neutral ambition. But more and more IOCs and NOCs recognise the need to signal clear intentions to shareholders and stakeholders.

What are Majors investing in?

They’ve bought into much of the zero-carbon value chain. Biofuels and carbon capture and storage have been in their portfolios for some time. The focus in the last four years has been on renewables (solar PV, onshore and offshore wind); battery storage and EV charging; and forestry (carbon sinks). There are similarities in scale and complexity between development of the biggest renewables and upstream projects.

How much have they spent?

In time, it’s going to be big, but very little’s been spent so far – just US$6 billion on M&A in four years, a tiny fraction of investment in the core business. But it’s in the formative stages. Right now, it’s about positioning, trialling and testing. Companies are trying to assess technologies – and timing – and where they can create value. Both Total and Shell are planning to invest up to US$2 billion a year and Total has committed to having 20% of assets in renewables by 2030.

And the returns?

Typically, single digits, say 5% to 9% IRR, depending on the technology and market among other factors. Returns can be boosted by innovative financing models and taking merchant risk. They don’t stack up well against pre-FID upstream oil and gas project returns, though there’s not a huge difference on full-cycle comparisons. It’s also worth bearing in mind that oil and gas returns will shrink as the energy transition gains momentum. That’s what ultimately will drive a ramp-up in exposure to zero-carbon assets.

Returns from zero-carbon assets tend to lag those in oil and gas (IRR)

Can you do new energy without customers?

Yes, though a pure renewable generator has similar advantages and disadvantages to a pure E&P player. An integrated business model – generation with customers – has potential for synergies between power and gas, and commodity trading could add significant value. Financing, too, is key in this game – Big Oil can use its balance sheet to its advantage. There’s also scope to leverage customer margins by selling other products and services, including EV charging. Total has dipped its toe in the water by buying Direct Energie (two million customers) in France, while Shell acquired First Utility (under one million) in the UK and is currently bidding for Dutch utility Eneco (0.7 million). We don’t think low-return transmission and distribution assets play any part in Big Oil’s model.

What takes things to another level?

A big acquisition. The power market is highly fragmented and zero-carbon businesses are typically small or held within a regional or local utility. Big Oil with an ambition to be big in New Energy will need scale. It may be some years away yet, but transformational M&A will come and accelerate the buildout.

Wood Mackenzie



6 Comments on "How serious are oil and gas companies about the energy transition?"

  1. Twocats on Wed, 14th Aug 2019 10:06 pm 

    I wonder if onshore profits would be as high if it excluded conventional Wells drilled more than 10 years ago? If it included all onshore Wells only from last ten years the IRR would be nowhere near 33%

  2. Sissyfuss on Thu, 15th Aug 2019 8:36 am 

    Trying to solve our energy/pollution dilemma with a fiscal application will do nothing but delay any meaningful transformations that are needed. Capitalisms growth mantra leads to a continuation of the natural world’s disintegration. Oil companies are serious about BAU because anything will cost them revenue. The time for rational discussion and casual efforts is well in the past. As overshoot shows no signs of slowing we will continue to grasp at straws that break the backs of various camels that are bearing the load if Industrial Civilization. Reducing population and emissions is in dire need but the message from leadership is don’t change a thing, for they they are quite comfortable as they build their escape pods. This will not end well but it will end.

  3. Dave Thompson on Thu, 15th Aug 2019 8:41 am 

    I have watched this so called “energy transition” for the past twenty years or so. The evidence shows that year over year humans burn more FF then ever.

  4. Kenz300 on Mon, 19th Aug 2019 9:51 pm 

    Oil and gas companies are not serious about the transition and are slow walking any change.

    The Climate Crisis is making financial institutions and insurance companies reevaluate the risks from Climate Changes and they are now backing away from that risk.

    Investors are starting to see the risks and do not want the liability that fossil fuel companies have. Wind and solar energy are safer, cleaner and cheaper for energy production and are good long term investments.

  5. Rick on Tue, 20th Aug 2019 4:46 pm 

    We are using way too much oil and gas. Once it’s gone, it is gone forever.

  6. Kenz300 on Thu, 22nd Aug 2019 10:18 pm 

    Financial institutions and Insurance Companies are rethinking their investments in fossil fuels. The risks are too high.

    As stock holders demand an open accounting of the financial risks fossil fuels companies face they will be seen as too risky to invest in or insure.

    What happens when insurance companies and banks don’t insure of lend for mortgages if the property is too close to the coast and rising sea levels.

    What happens to all the property and mortgages in places like Miami Florida. Own a condo and can’t insure it and can’t sell it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *