Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on July 16, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Chernobyl at Sea? Russia Building Floating Nuclear Power

Alternative Energy

So much for the lessons of Fukushima. Never mind oil spills, the Russian Federation is preparing an energy initiative that, if it has problems, will inject nuclear material into the maritime environment.

Speaking to reporters at the 6th International Naval Show in St. Petersburg, Baltiskii Zavod shipyard general director Aleksandr Voznesenskii said that the Russian Federation’s first floating nuclear power plant

“should be operational by 2016.”

Baltiysky Zavod is Russia’s biggest shipbuilding complex. According to Voznesenskii, the “Academician Lomonosov” FNPP will be the first vessel belonging to the new line of floating nuclear power plants that can provide energy, heat and water to remote and arid areas of the country, with mass production scheduled for the near future.

The “Academician Lomonosov’s” technology is based on the USSR’s construction of nuclear-powered icebreakers. The Russian media is speculating that the FNPPS will first be used in remote areas of the northeastern Arctic Russia and the Far East, as these regions currently suffer from a lack of energy, slowing their development. Each 21,000 ton vessel will have two “modified KLT-40 naval propulsion reactors” that will provide up to 70 megawatts of electricity or 300 megawatts of heat, sufficient for a city with a population of 200,000 people. Additionally, the floating NPPs can provide water desalination services capable of supplying up to 240,000 cubic meters of fresh water per day.

Perhaps referring to Soviet-era nuclear icebreakers is not such a hot idea, at least for those with historical memories.

Launched in 1957, the Lenin, the USSR’s first nuclear powered icebreaker, was powered by three OK-150 reactors. In February 1965, there was a loss of coolant incident, and some of the fuel elements melted or deformed inside reactor number two. The debris was removed and stored for two years, and subsequently dumped in Tsivolki Bay near Novaia Zemlia two years later. The second accident

was a cooling system leak, which occurred in 1967, shortly after refueling.
Not a reassuring development for the Soviet Arctic environment.

“Academician Lomonosov’s” keel was laid in April 2007 at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk on the White Sea, but the project was subsequently transferred to the Baltiskii Zavod. The “Academician Lomonosov’s” 21,500 ton hull was subsequently launched in 2010, although construction work was frozen in mid-2011because of bankruptcy proceedings against the shipyard. The company was subsequently acquired by state-owned United Shipbuilding Corporation and Rosenergoatom signed a new contract with the Baltiskii Zavod for the “Academician Lomonosov’s” completion. The “Academician Lomonosov” has 69 crew and specialists. Ominously, the “Academician Lomonosov” has no engines, so it needs to be towed. The vessel is equipped with two modified KLT-40 reactors.

But, not to worry.

The Baltiskii Zavod

shipyard stressed that The “Academician Lomonosov” and its successors are all designed with a safety margin exceeding all possible threats which makes its nuclear reactors invulnerable to tsunamis and other natural disasters and the ships meet all the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and do not pose a threat to the environment. The factory further states that 15 nations, including China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Algeria, Namibia and Argentina have already expressed interest in buying floating nuclear power plant.

The “Academician Lomonosov”will be sent to Vilyuchinsk, Kamchatka for operational testing. Rosatom then aims to construct seven more FNPPs by 2015, with four of them likely to be located on the northern coast of Siberia’s Yakutia. Other Arctic areas provisionally scheduled to receive FNPPs include port cities along the Russian Federation’s arctic coastal Northern Sea Route and Pevek in Chukotka. An added benefit of the FNPP as envisaged in Moscow is that the provision of nuclear power to the Arctic and Far East will free up more oil and natural gas

for foreign export, allowing the Russian federation to generate additional hard currency.

Tow cables snap, Arctic conditions can be unpredictable, ships sink. As the ocean is the common heritage of humanity, perhaps the international community might evince a tad more interest in this project.

6 Comments on "Chernobyl at Sea? Russia Building Floating Nuclear Power"

  1. GregT on Tue, 16th Jul 2013 7:23 pm 

    There are 5 ‘known’ nuclear submarines, reactors and all, that have sunk throughout the Atlantic Ocean. Some of them also contained nuclear warheads. How many are unaccounted for is anyone’s guess. Considered the fact that these were highly classified warships, there could very well be many more. It is also reported that there are dozens of nuclear powered warships rotting away in ports throughout Russia, that the government cannot afford to decommission, or safeguard the nuclear waste.

    Adding a few more of these radioactive toxic dump sites to the world’s oceans seems like an awfully stupid thing to do, considering we haven’t cleaned up

  2. GregT on Tue, 16th Jul 2013 7:25 pm 

    past dump sites, and we don’t know what to do to clean them up to begin with.

  3. J-Gav on Tue, 16th Jul 2013 7:33 pm 

    Fukushima is already injecting “nuclear material” into the maritime environment and sunken Russian nuclear subs are doing the same (or soon will be) in the Baltic Sea. So I guess they figure: a little more, a little less radioactivity in the sea, what the hell? You’re right, GregT, an extremely irresponsable decision as things begin to get desperate to keep up energy supply appearances and reel in some profits before the environmental blowback brings down the whole net energy house of cards.

  4. Plantagenet on Tue, 16th Jul 2013 7:45 pm 

    The USA and EU recklessly pump CO2 into the air. Why shouldn’t Russia pump radionuclides into the ocean?

  5. GregT on Tue, 16th Jul 2013 8:36 pm 

    Why don’t we all crap and urinate all over the insides of our own homes? Because eventually, we wouldn’t be able to live in them anymore. Kind of like what we are doing to our collective home, the Planet Earth. There is one very big difference, we can’t move to a different planet after we render this one inhabitable.

  6. GregT on Tue, 16th Jul 2013 9:01 pm 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *