Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on March 28, 2012

Bookmark and Share

Another Fusion Breakthrough

Another Fusion Breakthrough thumbnail

A small New Jersey company has reported a big step toward cracking nuclear fusion, the elusive energy source that many people regard as the Holy Grail of power.

Lawrenceville Plasma Physics Inc. said it has confined a gas at 1.8 billion degrees C. Its previous highest temperature was 1.1 billion degrees C, which it hit last year and which it says had stood as a fusion industry record since 1978.

As hot as the earlier 1.1 billion degrees C  might sound to you and me, it was too frigid to support LPP’s “aneutronic”  approach to fusion.

“The new work shatters those long-standing records, and, most importantly, achieves the temperature needed to burn aneutronic fuels,” the Lawrenceville, N.J.-based startup says in a press release.

Unlike today’s nuclear fission, nuclear fusion combines atoms, rather than splits them apart. Many people regard it as a potentially safe, cheap, CO2-free source of power that does not pose serious nuclear waste problems the way uranium-based fission does. It does not use uranium. Rather, it tends to deploy different forms of hydrogen, among other fuels.

The “aneutronic” form of fusion would use common hydrogen, rather than the isotopes of hydrogen on which several other fusion projects rely. (”Aneutronic” means “without neutrons” – normal hydrogen has no neutrons in its nucleus, just a proton).

If perfected, aneutronic fusion could be the ultimate of the ultimate power source, because it generates electricity directly, without using a turbine. Other forms of fusion, as well as nuclear fission, generate heat that creates steam (sometimes another gas) that drives a turbine.

But aneutronic requires severely higher temperatures than other forms of fusion, which theoretically operate at around 100 million-to-150 million degrees C. (And then there’s “cold fusion” which we’ll save for a rainy day; feel free to comment below).

LPP’s 1.8 billion degrees in principle topples the temperature barrier. The accomplishment marks the second breakthrough of three that LPP says is necessary for it to commercialize fusion. LPP had already demonstrated that it can confine fuel long enough to burn it, at tens of nanoseconds.

Now for its third and final  trick: “We are still far from having sufficient density in the tiny hot regions to get net energy, but that is our next goal,” says Eric Lerner, LPP’s chief scientist.

LPP director of business development Derek Shannon told SmartPlanet that once it reaches sufficient densities, it will have also achieved a net balance of energy output to commercialize a fusion device. In over half a century of research and development, the fusion industry has not yet managed to achieve an economical “gain” of energy out compared to the energy required to produce fusion-based electricity.

Shannon said that LPP could commercialize its fusion device about four years after hitting the required density. It’s not clear how long that might take.

“The LPP research team is currently upgrading their fusion device to achieve the higher densities required for net energy, a goal they hope to achieve soon,” the press release states.

To reach 1.8 billion degrees C, the company is using a technology known as dense plasma force (DPF), which fires lighting-like magnetized plasma balls of fuel at each other in a compressed space.

LPP is experimenting with a hydrogen isotope, called deuterium, which is one of the two isotopes that “common” (neutronic) fusion uses (the other is tritium). LPP’s goal is to eventually use normal hydrogen and boron as its fuel.

Part of its vision is to install small, garage-sized 5 megawatt fusion devices to provide neighborhood power.

Other companies working on aneutronic fusion include Tri-Alpha Energy, a stealth startup in Irvine, Calif. Startup General Fusion of Burnaby, Canada, and Helion Energy of Redmond, Wash., are chasing “neutronic” fusion.

Between them and LPP, it’s looking more likely than ever that fusion could hit the market within a decade or so – which is faster than the large, international government backed projects like ITER in France and the National Ignition Facility at California’s Lawrence LIvermore National Laboratory will accomplish.

 smart planet

7 Comments on "Another Fusion Breakthrough"

  1. Rick on Wed, 28th Mar 2012 9:17 pm 

    More propaganda. Personally, I hope fusion never becomes a reality. I don’t see any good coming from it. It will only be a reason for more people, that the world cannot support. More stuff that we don’t need, and more waste.

  2. DC on Wed, 28th Mar 2012 9:45 pm 

    Q/Part of its vision is to install small, garage-sized 5 megawatt fusion devices to provide neighborhood power.

    LOL!, havent the fission boosters been pushing that idea since forever as well? Only they call them ‘small modular reacters’ these days(SMR). They are a complete fantasy, and fusion, 10x more costly and complex(estimated, not one even knows for sure), forget it. Simply not going to happen-ever.

    This idea of small modular power runs 100% against what our corporate elites actually want. They want large, complex, centralized utilites as they SOLE providers of energy, thus they seek govt subsidies for coal and nuclear plants that only the wealthiest utilites can even afford to build.And as a result, that is exactly what we get. We could have modular power @ the local level now, with proven off-the shelf methods.

    They are called solar and wind, no multi-billion degress temperatures or star-level compression required. But look at the obstacles the oil-coal and nuclear cartels have thrown up to stop even these modest, affordable and doable right now technologies. Any schmoo can install and be trained to install and monitor a solar panel, but no, we need FUSION.(eta sometime this century,maybe, or never).

    Fusion power, when and if it materialzies will NOT be the size of a garage, more like the size a small town just by itself.

  3. george on Wed, 28th Mar 2012 10:47 pm 

    one point eight billion degrees would melt my car lol

  4. sudhr on Thu, 29th Mar 2012 10:43 am 

    Dear George..Its not n fuel to run your car.It will be used to produce Huge Megawatts of elctricity at very low cost Environment friendly..

  5. John smith on Thu, 29th Mar 2012 12:08 pm 

    I agree Rick. Why don’t you show some leadership and terminate your existence in a carbon friendly way. RIP Rick.

  6. Cécile on Mon, 2nd Apr 2012 11:14 am 

    if no one would have looked for new ways we would still be harvesting our fields by hands! We are getting more and have soon used up all our fossile sources of energy, we need to find some way to have energy renewable at low cost and with no damage to the environment. So why not give it a try?

  7. Robert on Tue, 3rd Apr 2012 12:52 pm 

    Rick-You seem to be suggesting that the road we’re heading down right now is okay. It’s not. Unless we drastically cut back carbon emissions we’re going to have an environmental disaster that may eventually kill hundreds of millions of people if not billions. Cheap fusion energy will not only reduce carbon dioxide but will also raise the standard of living around the world. Raising the standard of living always results in lower birth rates not higher birth rates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *