Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on October 27, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Trump and Clinton on energy

Public Policy

Energy independence has been a goal of every president since Richard Nixon, but it remains elusive.

Still, an ongoing drilling boom has lowered dependence on imports of fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas. In 2015, the U.S. relied on net imports for about 24 percent of petroleum use, the lowest level since 1970.

Domestic production of all types of energy except coal has boomed in recent years, thanks to improved drilling techniques and discoveries of vast oil supplies in North Dakota and Montana and natural gas in states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia. Hydraulic fracturing — a drilling technique better known as fracking — has also increased production in traditional energy states such as Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana.

After President Barack Obama’s two terms, business and environmental groups see a game-changing election on energy. Donald Trump has vowed to ramp up oil and gas production even further, while rolling back Obama policies aimed at slowing climate change and boosting renewable energy.

Hillary Clinton says she will expand Obama’s climate policies and push even harder for renewable energy such as wind and solar power that have gained under Obama. Meanwhile, Clinton’s comment that she is going to “put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business” has become a rallying cry for the GOP.

Natural gas, cleaner than coal, has been embraced by politicians from both parties, including Clinton and Trump. Still, critics worry that fracking and other techniques such as horizontal drilling could be harming our air, water and health and even causing earthquakes.

Wind and solar power have grown in recent years, thanks in part to support from Obama, but renewable energy sources accounted for just 10 percent of total U.S. energy consumption in 2015. Renewable energy is generally more expensive to produce and use than fossil fuels. Clouds impair solar energy, and calm skies slow wind farms.

Here’s a summary of their proposals:


OIL AND GAS

CLINTON: She generally supports oil and gas drilling on federal lands, but would bar drilling in the Arctic and Atlantic oceans. While Clinton would cut subsidies currently given to oil companies, she has said natural gas serves as an important “bridge” to more renewable fuels. She says fracking should not take place where states and local communities oppose it and pledges to reduce methane emissions from all oil and gas production and protect local water supplies. She also would require energy companies to disclose the chemicals used in fracking.

TRUMP: He complains that “energy is under siege by the Obama administration” and vows to “unleash” an American energy revolution, allowing unfettered production of oil, coal and natural gas. He would sharply increase oil and gas drilling on federal lands and open up offshore drilling in the Atlantic Ocean and other areas where it is blocked.

Trump says restrictions supported by Clinton would hurt energy-producing states such as Colorado, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Virginia — battleground states in the election.


RENEWABLE ENERGY

CLINTON: Pledges that under her leadership, the U.S. will be able to generate enough renewable energy to power every home in America within 10 years, with 500 million solar panels installed by the end of her first term. She also vows to reduce U.S. oil consumption by one-third through cleaner fuels such as biodiesel and natural gas and more fuel-efficient cars, boilers, ships and trucks.

Clinton vows to use tax incentives and other steps to bolster wind and solar power, as well hydroelectricity, geothermal power and other forms of renewable electricity.

TRUMP: Argues that tax credits and other subsidies for wind and solar power “distort” the market, but says the U.S. should “encourage all facets of the energy industry,” including wind and solar power, as a way to achieve energy independence. He has characterized solar energy as an “unproven technology” with a low return on investment and says wind energy has killed birds and is a “very, very poor source of energy.”


COAL

CLINTON: After running as a champion of coal in 2008, Clinton has faced a backlash from coal communities after she declared earlier this year that she was going to “put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.” Clinton has said she misspoke as she tried to reassure voters that her policies would benefit out-of-work miners and other poor people in Appalachia affected by the coal industry’s downturn.

Clinton says she will protect health and pension benefits for coal miners and fight efforts by coal companies to use bankruptcy proceedings to deny benefits to thousands of retired miners and their families. She supports sweeping reforms to the federal black lung benefits program and will adjust black lung benefits to reflect cost-of-living increases.

TRUMP: Vows to revive the struggling U.S coal industry and says the U.S. has enough coal reserves to “last for 1,000 years.” He vows to end “all job-destroying Obama executive actions as well as reduce and eliminate all barriers to responsible energy production.” He says his plan “will end the war on the American worker, putting our coal miners and steel workers back to work.”


CLIMATE CHANGE

CLINTON: Calls climate change a real and urgent problem and says the U.S. can take the global lead in addressing it. She vows to meet Obama’s goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 30 percent by 2025 and says America “can rally the world to cut carbon pollution” while fulfilling “our moral obligation to protect this planet for our children and our grandchildren.”

TRUMP: Calls climate change a “hoax” perpetrated by China and others and says he will rescind Obama’s Clean Power Plan rules to curb greenhouse gas emissions from the utility sector. The plan, a lynchpin of Obama’s climate strategy, has been delayed by the Supreme Court while legal challenges are heard. Trump also would cancel the 2015 Paris climate agreement and stop U.S. money going to U.N. global warming programs.


NUCLEAR POWER

CLINTON: Offers cautious support for nuclear power, calling it a tool to address climate change.

TRUMP: Says he will ensure the U.S. remains the world’s leader in nuclear energy.

The Republic



8 Comments on "Trump and Clinton on energy"

  1. rockman on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 3:30 pm 

    “In 2015, the U.S. relied on net imports for about 24 percent of petroleum use, the lowest level since 1970.”

    According to the EIA in 2015 the United States consumed an average of about 19.4 million barrels per day. They also report US net oil imports that year at 6.9 million bopd. IOW the US imported 36% of the oil consumed in 2015. The 2015 net oil import volume was higher then at any time prior to 1993. US net oil imports in 1970 were 1.3 million bopd…which is significantly less then 6.9 million bopd.

  2. rockman on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 3:38 pm 

    In 2015, the U.S. relied on net imports for about 24 percent of petroleum use, the lowest level since 1970.”

    According to the EIA in 2015 the United States consumed an average of about 19.4 million barrels per day. They also report US net oil imports that year at 6.9 million bopd. IOW the US imported 36% of the oil consumed in 2015. The 2015 net oil import volume was higher then at any time prior to 1993. US net oil imports in 1970 were 1.3 million bopd…which is significantly less then 6.9 million bopd.

    As far as what either candidate says about energy I’ll reply in a similar manner: “Blah, blah, blah, etc.” And I give you my most sincere word on it. LOL.

  3. Anonymous on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 5:02 pm 

    “Energy independence has been a goal of every president since Richard Nixon”

    Stopped reading after that.

  4. Plantagenet on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 6:18 pm 

    Obama essentially allowed the oil companies to “drill baby drill” and US oil production ramped up dramatically.

    I expect president Hillary to continue Obama’s “drill baby drill” approach.

    Cheers!

  5. GregT on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 7:01 pm 

    So now Obama is personally responsible for The Oil Glut™ as well, eh Planter? Do you believe that he is also responsible for the 200% increase in Oil prices from 2002 to now?

    Cheers!

  6. Northwest Resident on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 7:18 pm 

    Ignorant natives conjured up gods and attributed to those gods the things they could not otherwise explain — volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, drought, etc. And today in our modern age we continue to see simple-minded and ignorant people attributing things they can not otherwise explain to those who have nothing at all to do with it. Case in point: “Obama essentially allowed the oil companies to drill baby drill..” The actual reality is much more complicated, but hey, if you can blame it on someone and that helps your simple mind achieve some kind of peace, then don’t let anybody stop you.

  7. Boat on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 8:01 pm 

    rockman on Thu, 27th Oct 2016 3:38 pm

    How much petroleum does the United States import and export?
    In 2015, the United States imported approximately 9.4 million barrels per day (MMb/d) of petroleum from about 88 countries. Petroleum includes crude oil, natural gas plant liquids, liquefied refinery gases, refined petroleum products such as gasoline and diesel fuel, and biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel. About 78% of gross petroleum imports were crude oil.

    In 2015, the United States exported about 4.7 MMb/d of petroleum to 147 countries. Most of the exports were petroleum products. The resulting net imports (imports minus exports) of petroleum were about 4.7 MMb/d.

    http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=727&t=6

    You got a link to that 6.9 bpd 2015 number?

    http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=WTTNTUS2&f=W

  8. Kenz300 on Sat, 29th Oct 2016 10:24 am 

    A sexist bully. A con man that does not know the difference between lies and truth.

    The family values candidate. Why do they stay with him ? In his own words he said:

    Paid no taxes, divorced how many times, degrades women, does not respect veterans and their families, is making money from his campaign funneling money to his businesses, has questionable charity contributions, filed for bankruptcy multiple times, takes huge tax breaks at the taxpayers expense, flip flops on issues, The top 1% want it all and the RepubliCON party will give it to them.

    A CON man with no moral values.

    This is what the RepubliCON party has become.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *