Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on August 22, 2016

Bookmark and Share

The Psychopolitics of Global Warming and Population Control

Despite the fact that man-made climate change continue to be proven false, the left drives on with its fear-driven insistence that human beings must dramatically change their behavior in order to save the planet. Everything revolves around the idea that man’s consumption of natural resources is creating an unsustainable environment, and if we don’t somehow curb our use of fossil fuels, we will destroy mother Earth and humanity itself. The left would have you believe that the only way to save our world is to give up your sovereignty and let a cabal of global elitists tell you how to live. In fact, James Traub, writing for Foreign Policy magazine, claims that it is time to force people to accept a reality they may not want to accept. He says that the masses are deluded and it is the job of the global elite to set them straight. This is because, across the world, people are rejecting globalism and embracing freedom. As far as climate change goes, it is obviously an agenda that revolves around completely controlling man kind’s activities, including the rate at which we reproduce.

According to Travis Rieder, professor at the John Hopkins University in Baltimore, dangerous climate change will be taking place by the year 2036, and this is ample reason to stop having children.  He is attempting to scare people into believing that the world is too much of a horrible place to raise kids and it would be more compassionate, given the threats we face, to not have children at all. Truthfully, this is all part of the U.N. agenda on sustainable development and population control. The left wants you to believe that having children poses a greater risk to the environment, as they will grow up being consumers in rich, capitalist countries. This consumption, of course, contributes to the use of over-strained natural resources and leaves an excessive carbon footprint, which, in turn, contributes to catastrophic climate change. The website populationmatters.org discusses the importance of choosing to have a small family and also cites some of the same issues concerning the environment and child bearing.

“Many people today seek to live in a more sustainable and environmentally friendly manner. They travel less, or in ways that cause lower emissions. They use energy efficient methods to heat and power their homes. They recycle what they can and seek to minimize their food miles and food waste. These are all to be welcomed, but they only reduce a person’s impact to a limited extent and only for their lifetime.

Your choice about how many children you have is much more important. Each additional child will have more impact on the environment and consume more resources. And the impact will continue for that child’s life and the lives of all of his or her descendants.”

The issue of bringing children into the world is discussed here as if it is a harmful event that contributes to the destruction of humanity. They speak of having a child in the same terms of choosing how to heat or cool your home in the interest of saving energy; this is because they want you to believe that bringing children into the world places a greater burden on limited natural resources. To understand this further, consider the following from a document called From Consumer Kids to Sustainable Childhood.

“Mainstreaming sustainability education is essential to creating the awareness and inherent understanding among all children of the bounded reality of a closed system such as Earth’s where infinite growth based on natural resources is an oxymoron. Understanding the links between a consumer lifestyle and environmental degradation is paramount to children’s ability to think critically and take action towards more sustainable lifestyles for themselves and their current and future communities.”

The underlined portion sums it quite nicely; they believe that there are simply too many people on Earth and that there are not enough resources to go around. Truthfully this has nothing to do with global warming as much as it has to do with the elite wanting complete control of the resources in question. Global warming and the issue of sustainability are the means with which they convince the people to accept their agenda out of fear, and their agenda is simply reducing the size of the world’s population. Consider, for example, the words of the U.N. climate chief Christina Figueres. She says that the world should make every effort to reduce the world’s population to protect the environment and fight global warming. She also stated that the expected increase in population levels to nine billion people by 2050 would be an enormous strain on the Earth’s natural resources. Suggesting that people should not have children appears to be one of the chosen methods to convince people that reducing the population is a necessity.

How do you convince humanity that putting the brakes on their own procreation is a good idea? You use the education system to teach them that their lifestyles are unsustainable and their traditional goals of wealth creation and home ownership are selfish and greedy.  You teach them that their everyday activities are contributing to the destruction of the environment and that, if they don’t drastically change their behavior, humanity will face unparalleled destruction.

 Internationally, the United Nations has spearheaded efforts to upgrade sustainability teaching via the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014). One major output of these efforts is a multimedia teacher education program on ‘Teaching and Learning for a Sustainable Future’ complete with learning modules and child focused learning activities. Overall, the objective is to advise national governments to implement sustainability in all formal education.  (http://www.worldwatch-europe.org/sites/default/files/WIE_REPORT_2_CONTENT_FINAL_LQ.pdf)

The underlined portion highlights the United Nations’ intentions to implement sustainable education worldwide in all formal education settings, including the United States.  In many universities, as well as high schools across the country, kids are being taught that capitalism is unsustainable and greedy, and that the consumer driven society in which we live is responsible for the depletion of valuable natural resources. The overall intent is to convince humanity that they are living lives that are destroying their environment and the only way to stop this from happening is to surrender to the dictates of a global oligarchy. In other words, they want you to fear the lies and turn to their solutions. On that note it is appropriate that we re-examine the words of Laventri Beria, from Brain Washing- A Synthesis on the Russian Art of Psychopolitics-

By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. At last a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State, at last only Communism can resolve the problems of the masses.

Global warming is one of the biggest hoaxes ever devised by the evil minds of men. The intent is to scare the masses into accepting an agenda that will completely dominate all aspects of their lives. The idea that carbon dioxide, a gas that is absorbed by plants to produce oxygen, is destroying the planet is the very definition of scientific turmoil. They want you to see the reasonableness in surrendering your freedom in order to save the planet, and if you are unwilling to do so, you will then become part of the problem.  We know what happens to people that dictatorial regimes consider to be a part of the problem. They are already attempting to criminalize speech that goes against the global warming narrative. How far will this go? How far will the elite go to accomplish their goals of depopulation? Will they soon begin rounding up global warming dissenters? If enough of the mindless sheeple can be convinced that the deniers are making their life more difficult the answer to, that question could very well be yes.

freedomoutpost.com



71 Comments on "The Psychopolitics of Global Warming and Population Control"

  1. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 1:09 pm 

    5 islands have disappeared from the Solomon Islands in the Pacific Ocean due to rising sea levels: Study

    http://www.straitstimes.com/world/5-islands-have-disappeared-from-the-solomon-islands-in-the-pacific-ocean-due-to-rising-sea

    Truly “they” are dedicated hoaxers to create an illusion that makes it look like 5 islands disappeared. Must be using that Romulan cloaking device they got at the crash site in Roswell NM back in 1947.

  2. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 1:17 pm 

    And another record die off.

    Puffin chicks in Gulf of Maine’s largest colony starve to death at record rate

    A drop in the food supply this summer, possibly tied to warmer Gulf of Maine waters, leads to the worst survival rate ever tracked on Machias Seal Island.

    http://www.pressherald.com/2016/08/23/puffin-chicks-starve-to-death-in-high-numbers-at-largest-colony-off-maine/

  3. Sissyfuss on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 2:01 pm 

    This is what truly gets to me, Apeman. The wanton destruction and eventual extinction of so many wonderful creatures who are doing nothing more than living their lives naturally and in obeisance to the spirit of Nature. I prefer animals to the naked ape, for their integrity is a thousand times greater.

  4. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 2:15 pm 

    Nature itself will eventually stop the humans, but who knows what will be left since a mass extinction is defined as 75% or greater loss of species and the fossil record indicates that almost nothing over 99lbs survived (terrestrial). The average recovery period from mass extinctions is about 10 million years, but never before was there nuclear waste, so who know? Hell the nuclear may only add 1 million years on a full recovery or none at all on those time lines. Homo sapiens are 200,000 years old, but it appears that our complex cognitive abilities are only 70,000 to 100,000 years old. Civilization is a whole 5000 years old and industrial civilization is about 250 years and it’s almost finished. Jelly fish have been around for about 600 million years and you never hear them bragging like the humans eh?

  5. onlooker on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 2:43 pm 

    http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2016/160816/ncomms12459/full/ncomms12459.html
    Bees becoming extinct. I hear you guys, we have and are driving so many species to extinction and more in the future that we are the direct cause of this ongoing extinctions level event. Quite a feat

  6. PracticalMaina on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 2:51 pm 

    Apneaman, wow, I havent scene that in the local papers but I believe it, it has been hot and dry. Thats another local species in trouble due to climate change. They say that the mortality rate for young moose was terrible last winter in New Hampshire due to increased ticks feeding on the young animals.

  7. PracticalMaina on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 2:52 pm 

    That blows my mind, I will be spreading the word locally.

  8. PracticalMaina on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 2:58 pm 

    Shows how narrow minded I am, even for someone who knows that climate change is an imminent danger, it hits me harder hearing that a local bird is dying off than islands have disappeared in the Pacific. A good summary of why we are in all likelihood screwed, IMHO.

  9. peakyeast on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 3:09 pm 

    The really disgusting part is that “we” need a REASON to let anything else live on the planet. It must be part of our industrial production, even being a big tourist attraction is not enough justification for humans to letting something have its space and live.

    There shouldnt be any reason to let other species exist. That is just the way it should be – basic decency, basic caution on the side of safety, part of being fair and reasonable. We can conclude those are not human traits. That humans needs a “good” reason to let other species exist is enough alone to warrant the removal humans from the picture.

    Good bye and Good Riddance – dumb fuck killer apes.

  10. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 4:11 pm 

    More than a quarter of India’s land is turning to desert – ‘There is no coherent plan to reverse this process or its impact’

    http://www.desdemonadespair.net/2016/08/more-than-quarter-of-indias-land-is.html

    The plan is to build boats and come to N America. Lots of bad blood between Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims so there will be recruitment opportunities – the enemy of my enemy and all that.

  11. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 6:22 pm 

    I have a new Hero.

    Mystery graffiti with grim message appears on abandoned SoBe tower

    “South Beach residents woke up to a grim prediction painted in neat block letters across the top of the old abandoned South Shore Hospital: “YOUR MILLION DOLLAR HOUSES WILL SOON BE UNDERWATER.””

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/miami-beach/article97458247.html

    LMAO

  12. peakyeast on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 7:17 pm 

    @ape: Yes LOL.. Very cute..

    ““But we have great leadership in the Beach to deal this,”

    Even more laughable.. The leadership is changing every few years, but I suppose that is enough to last centuries…

    And then…
    “As long as we deal with it, Miami Beach won’t be underwater.”

    Ain’t that the TRUTH !! Until you cant, of course! – Which happens to be exactly the point of the message.

  13. peakyeast on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 7:19 pm 

    Btw. I agree: It is beautifully written. I dont think I could have done it so well… Almost like he had stencils with him.

  14. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 8:28 pm 

    “As long as we deal with it, Miami Beach won’t be underwater.”

    Dutch Sea Level Rise Expert: Miami Will Be “the New Atlantis,” a City in the Sea

    http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/dutch-sea-level-rise-expert-miami-will-be-the-new-atlantis-a-city-in-the-sea-7628340

  15. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 8:30 pm 

    “deal with it” means spending taxpayer money to protect the developer’s interests.

  16. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 8:38 pm 

    Surprisingly informative for gizmodo.

    This is How South Florida Ends

    “The important thing we have learned from studying the past is that sea level rises in pulses.”

    http://gizmodo.com/this-is-how-south-florida-ends-1783803198

  17. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 9:26 pm 

    Miami faces $3.5T loss, highest risk of sea level rise among all coastal cities: report

    http://therealdeal.com/miami/2016/08/16/miami-faces-3-5t-loss-highest-risk-of-sea-level-rise-among-all-coastal-cities-report/

  18. Apneaman on Wed, 24th Aug 2016 11:46 pm 

    Cruel Summer:
    Floods, fires and heat

    “When it comes to our climate, everything is connected. And there has never been a year, and most especially a summer, that has so prominently and destructively showcased this.

    Right now, wildfires are blazing across the drought-stricken western United States, overpowering firefighters in California. Earlier this summer, the already scorching Middle East saw all-time record heat. Meanwhile, from huge swaths of China to at least four states in the U.S., devastating flooding has inundated homes and uprooted lives.

    And we still haven’t arrived at the peak of hurricane season.

    The extreme weather events we’ve seen — and are still living through — around the world collectively bear the fingerprints of human-caused global warming. So, too, does the bevy of monthly heat records that have fallen so frequently that the news stories announcing them almost write themselves.”

    http://mashable.com/2016/08/19/extremes-floods-fires-global-warming/#tg1cfiOwc5qs

  19. Kevin Cobley on Thu, 25th Aug 2016 3:52 am 

    Only read the first and last paragraphs of this rant, after reading the last paragraph concluded I wouldn’t bother to read the rest. It’s was already clear that the writer was nutjob.

  20. Kenz300 on Thu, 25th Aug 2016 6:17 am 

    Inside the Koch Brothers’ Toxic Empire | Rolling Stone

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/inside-the-koch-brothers-toxic-empire-20140924?page=2

    Koch Brothers Continue to Fund Climate Change Denial Machine, Spend $21M to Defend Exxon

    http://ecowatch.com/2016/06/22/koch-defends-exxon/

    Big Coal Funded This Prominent Climate Change Denier, Docs Reveal

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/roy-spencer-peabody-energy_us_57601e12e4b053d43306535e

    Pope Francis’s edict on climate change will anger deniers and US churches | World news | The Guardian

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/27/pope-francis-edict-climate-change-us-rightwing

    Head Of The Episcopal Church Says It’s ‘Sinful’ To Ignore Climate Change

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/26/katherine-jefferts-schori-climate-change_n_6949532.html?utm_hp_ref=green&ir=Green

  21. Kenz300 on Sat, 27th Aug 2016 6:35 am 

    The Effects Of Growth: Sprawl & Development – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA33sraoyCk

    Watch The Climate Change Ad Fox News Didn’t Want Its Viewers To See

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/climate-change-ad-fox-news_us_57892a37e4b03fc3ee50c207?section=

    Climate Change is real….. we will all be impacted by it……

    Exxon’s Climate Change Cover-Up Is ‘Unparalleled Evil,’ Says Activist

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/exxon-evil-bill-mckibben_561e7362e4b028dd7ea5f45f?utm_hp_ref=green&ir=Green&section=green

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *