Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 16, 2018

Bookmark and Share

The Pentagon Can’t Account for $21 Trillion

The Pentagon Can’t Account for $21 Trillion thumbnail

Twenty-one trillion dollars.

The Pentagon’s own numbers show that it can’t account for $21 trillion. Yes, I mean trillion with a “T.” And this could change everything.

But I’ll get back to that in a moment.

There are certain things the human mind is not meant to do. Our complex brains cannot view the world in infrared, cannot spell words backward during orgasm and cannot really grasp numbers over a few thousand. A few thousand, we can feel and conceptualize. We’ve all been in stadiums with several thousand people. We have an idea of what that looks like (and how sticky the floor gets).

But when we get into the millions, we lose it. It becomes a fog of nonsense. Visualizing it feels like trying to hug a memory. We may know what $1 million can buy (and we may want that thing), but you probably don’t know how tall a stack of a million $1 bills is. You probably don’t know how long it takes a minimum-wage employee to make $1 million.

That’s why trying to understand—truly understand—that the Pentagon spent 21 trillion unaccounted-for dollars between 1998 and 2015 washes over us like your mother telling you that your third cousin you met twice is getting divorced. It seems vaguely upsetting, but you forget about it 15 seconds later because … what else is there to do?

Twenty-one trillion.

But let’s get back to the beginning. A couple of years ago, Mark Skidmore, an economics professor, heard Catherine Austin Fitts, former assistant secretary in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, say that the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General had found $6.5 trillion worth of unaccounted-for spending in 2015. Skidmore, being an economics professor, thought something like, “She means $6.5 billion. Not trillion. Because trillion would mean the Pentagon couldn’t account for more money than the gross domestic product of the whole United Kingdom. But still, $6.5 billion of unaccounted-for money is a crazy amount.”

So he went and looked at the inspector general’s report, and he found something interesting: It was trillion! It was fucking $6.5 trillion in 2015 of unaccounted-for spending! And I’m sorry for the cursing, but the word “trillion” is legally obligated to be prefaced with “fucking.” It is indeed way more than the U.K.’s GDP.

Skidmore did a little more digging. As Forbes reported in December 2017, “[He] and Catherine Austin Fitts … conducted a search of government websites and found similar reports dating back to 1998. While the documents are incomplete, original government sources indicate $21 trillion in unsupported adjustments have been reported for the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the years 1998-2015.”

Let’s stop and take a second to conceive how much $21 trillion is (which you can’t because our brains short-circuit, but we’ll try anyway).

1. The amount of money supposedly in the stock market is $30 trillion.

2. The GDP of the United States is $18.6 trillion.

3. Picture a stack of money. Now imagine that that stack of dollars is all $1,000 bills. Each bill says “$1,000” on it. How high do you imagine that stack of dollars would be if it were $1 trillion. It would be 63 miles high.

4. Imagine you make $40,000 a year. How long would it take you to make $1 trillion? Well, don’t sign up for this task, because it would take you 25 million years (which sounds like a long time, but I hear that the last 10 million really fly by because you already know your way around the office, where the coffee machine is, etc.).

The human brain is not meant to think about a trillion dollars.

And it’s definitely not meant to think about the $21 trillion our Department of Defense can’t account for. These numbers sound bananas. They sound like something Alex Jones found tattooed on his backside by extraterrestrials.

But the 21 trillion number comes from the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General—the OIG. Although, as Forbes pointed out, “after Mark Skidmore began inquiring about OIG-reported unsubstantiated adjustments, the OIG’s webpage, which documented, albeit in a highly incomplete manner, these unsupported “accounting adjustments,” was mysteriously taken down.”

Luckily, people had already grabbed copies of the report, which—for now—you can view here.

Here’s something else important from that Forbes article—which is one of the only mainstream media articles you can find on the largest theft in American history:

Given that the entire Army budget in fiscal year 2015 was $120 billion, unsupported adjustments were 54 times the level of spending authorized by Congress.

That’s right. The expenses with no explanation were 54 times the actual budget allotted by Congress. Well, it’s good to see Congress is doing 1/54th of its job of overseeing military spending (that’s actually more than I thought Congress was doing). This would seem to mean that 98 percent of every dollar spent by the Army in 2015 was unconstitutional.

So, pray tell, what did the OIG say caused all this unaccounted-for spending that makes Jeff Bezos’ net worth look like that of a guy jingling a tin can on the street corner?

“[The July 2016 inspector general] report indicates that unsupported adjustments are the result of the Defense Department’s ‘failure to correct system deficiencies.’

They blame trillions of dollars of mysterious spending on a “failure to correct system deficiencies”? That’s like me saying I had sex with 100,000 wild hairless aardvarks because I wasn’t looking where I was walking.

Twenty-one trillion.

Say it slowly to yourself.

At the end of the day, there are no justifiable explanations for this amount of unaccounted-for, unconstitutional spending. Right now, the Pentagon is being audited for the first time ever, and it’s taking 2,400 auditors to do it. I’m not holding my breath that they’ll actually be allowed to get to the bottom of this.

But if the American people truly understood this number, it would change both the country and the world. It means that the dollar is sprinting down a path toward worthless. If the Pentagon is hiding spending that dwarfs the amount of tax dollars coming in to the federal government, then it’s clear the government is printing however much it wants and thinking there are no consequences. Once these trillions are considered, our fiat currency has even less meaning than it already does, and it’s only a matter of time before inflation runs wild.

It also means that any time our government says it “doesn’t have money” for a project, it’s laughable. It can clearly “create” as much as it wants for bombing and death. This would explain how Donald Trump’s military can drop well over 100 bombs a day that cost well north of $1 million each.

So why can’t our government also “create” endless money for health care, education, the homeless, veterans benefits and the elderly, to make all parking free and to pay the Rolling Stones to play stoop-front shows in my neighborhood? (I’m sure the Rolling Stones are expensive, but surely a trillion dollars could cover a couple of songs.)

Obviously, our government could do those things, but it chooses not to. Earlier this month, Louisiana sent eviction notices to 30,000 elderly people on Medicaid to kick them out of their nursing homes. Yes, a country that can vomit trillions of dollars down a black hole marked “Military” can’t find the money to take care of our poor elderly. It’s a repulsive joke.

Twenty-one trillion.

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates spoke about how no one knows where the money is flying in the Pentagon. In a barely reported speech in 2011, he said, “My staff and I learned that it was nearly impossible to get accurate information and answers to questions such as, ‘How much money did you spend?’ and ‘How many people do you have?’

They can’t even find out how many people work for a specific department?

Note for anyone looking for a job: Just show up at the Pentagon and tell them you work there. It doesn’t seem like they’d have much luck proving you don’t.

For more on this story, check out David DeGraw’s excellent reporting at ChangeMaker.media, because the mainstream corporate media are mouthpieces for the weapons industry. They are friends with benefits of the military-industrial complex. I have seen basically nothing from the mainstream corporate media concerning this mysterious $21 trillion. I missed the time when CNN’s Wolf Blitzer said that the money we dump into war and death—either the accounted-for money or the secretive trillions—could end world hunger and poverty many times over. There’s no reason anybody needs to be starving or hungry or unsheltered on this planet, but our government seems hellbent on proving that it stands for nothing but profiting off death and misery. And our media desperately want to show they stand for nothing but propping up our morally bankrupt empire.

When the media aren’t actively promoting war, they’re filling the airwaves with shit, so the entire country can’t even hear itself think. Our whole mindscape is filled to the brim with nonsense and vacant celebrity idiocy. Then, while no one is looking, the largest theft humankind has ever seen is going on behind our backs—covered up under the guise of “national security.”

Twenty-one trillion.

Don’t forget.

truthdig



65 Comments on "The Pentagon Can’t Account for $21 Trillion"

  1. Davy on Sat, 19th May 2018 5:19 am 

    nederdummy, check out the population of Chicago and check out the cities around Chicago. 1940 Chicago is much different from current Chicago with suburbs. Besides educated minorities are not the animals that are found in a few neighborhoods in these cities. The racial makeup was 52.8% Non-Latino White, 22.1% were Latino, 16.7% were Non-Latino African Americans, and 6.4% were Asian. The city is almost 11,000 sq/mi. Holland is 16,000 sq/mi. Population is 9.5MIL in Chicago. In Holland you have 17MIL. GDP of metropolitan Chicago is $651BIL. Holland is $846BIL. You are saying Chicago is what? /rolleyes

  2. Cloggie on Sat, 19th May 2018 6:02 am 

    The future of America can be seen here:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/HarmlessYardDog/status/967415441839796225

    After Trump, who scored an unlikely victory “by the finger-nails”, it is game over for European-America, for ever. From then on you will be at the mercy of the milliminds of this world and his merry band of coloreds and leftist-white SJWs…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC-Cqkq6zWc

    …who indeed are not all animals, but nevertheless for 99%, gleefully will write the new laws that will apply to you whites, till kingdom comes.

    Core message: pay up, you whitey and abandon your “white privilege” by doing so. Think universal healthcare, think basic income, think massive affirmative action. And in general open season on whites:

    https://documents1940.wordpress.com/2017/10/26/the-new-america/

    And what will our spineless hypocrite Meathead do?

    https://tinyurl.com/ybyabbe9

    Hey look! Third of the left, that’s Meathead, en route to Italy, the new promised land of the “huddled masses”. That’s Meathead alright, preaching political correctness and multi-racialism, the cuck that he is, but when the going gets tough, he sneaks out to ultra-white Italy, straight into European safety. Meathead is no fool, ooooh no he isn’t. Meathead has options, the speculator that he is!

  3. Davy on Sat, 19th May 2018 6:26 am 

    “Core message: pay up, you whitey and abandon your “white privilege” by doing so. Think universal healthcare, think basic income, think massive affirmative action. And in general open season on whites:”

    Sounds like most Eurotard policies I have seen. In the US it is fringe talk and that is why it is on your radar screen. You cherry-pick the crazy talk and post it as fact. SCUMBAG

  4. MASTERMIND on Sat, 19th May 2018 6:53 am 

    Italy’s populist coalition government poses new threat to eurozone

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/italy-coalition-election-latest-eurozone-eu-five-star-lega-nord-a8357296.html

    Europe is collapsing! You know once the far right starts to rise again their! Only bad things will happen. They will be less free, less prosperous, and more conflict driven. No good can come from letting the dumbest and most ignorant rule your society..

  5. Cloggie on Sat, 19th May 2018 8:07 am 

    Italy’s populist coalition government poses new threat to eurozone

    What threat?

    They do not want to leave the euro, they just want to open the money tap, but nobody is going to fund them. They will return to reality within a year.

    But they will stop the influx of invaders and mend relations with Russia. That’s what counts. Let America become a third world country all by itself, not Europe.

  6. MASTERMIND on Sat, 19th May 2018 8:38 am 

    Clogg

    Europe is in a depression. And its late stages. That is why populist are winning..You dumb shit..The reason is in times of crisis. People swing to extremism and nationalism. Only an increase in prosperity can lead to open and tolerant societies.

  7. Cloggie on Sat, 19th May 2018 8:45 am 

    #110 is under way

    https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm

  8. Cloggie on Sat, 19th May 2018 8:56 am 

    “Europe is in a depression. And its late stages. That is why populist are winning”

    Populists are winning and as a consequence Europe will return to global power, where we have been for 2000 years and we will snatch the majority of European America from under your XXL noses. There is nobody who can stop 700 million Europeans, soon to be extended with 150 million European Americans.

    Now bow for your new masters.

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/908338/Berlusconi-Italy-election-2018-EU-army-Brussels-Berlusconi-nuevo-look

    https://www.rt.com/news/387313-us-losing-leadership-eu-mogherini/

    (These Italians certainly have neo-Roman tendencies.lol Time to throw out Christianity and return to classic values. Kick Marxist but)

  9. MASTERMIND on Sat, 19th May 2018 9:01 am 

    Hitler definitely died in 1945, according to new study of his teeth

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/19/hitler-definitely-died-1945-according-new-study-teeth/

  10. Davy on Sat, 19th May 2018 9:02 am 

    “What threat?”

    What a financially and economically blind zombie nazi. Thank god for Euroland there are not many more like you.

  11. Cloggie on Sat, 19th May 2018 9:03 am 

    Boris Johnson is currently crawling through the Amazon Rainforest, in search for new trading partners.lol

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5746823/Boris-Johnson-heads-Amazon-jungle-begins-five-day-tour-Latin-America.html#comments

    Most revealing are the skeptical reader comments. Note, this is a “right-wing”, pro-Brexit newspaper.

    Priceless comment: “the only thing Argentina wants from Britain are the Falklands”.

    Their humor is world class, indeed.

  12. Cloggie on Sat, 19th May 2018 9:08 am 

    “What threat?”

    What a financially and economically blind zombie nazi. Thank god for Euroland there are not many more like you.”

    As per usual, the little guys of the white race resort to Nazi-calling at the earliest opportunity. Saves him the trouble of explaining what threats there are for Europe now that even meathead admits that the American Era is over.

  13. Davy on Sat, 19th May 2018 10:28 am 

    “As per usual, the little guys of the white race resort to Nazi-calling at the earliest opportunity”
    Come on dumb dutch guy, read over your comments and check out your name calling. What a stupid hypocrite. Little guys?? We are about the same build and I am 10 years are so younger. I imagine it would be a good match up other than you don’t do shit but lay on your nuts. I imagine I have more stamina than you do so.

    American era is over. The European era was over 70 years ago. We are in the multipolar 21st century but zombie Nazis like you are still on the blitzkrieg battlefields of yesterday reliving the Nazi fantasy glories.

  14. Anonymouse1 on Sat, 19th May 2018 1:43 pm 

    Dont be so hard on the nederyid. You and him a share a great in common excetopnalturd, and no, its not your mutual love and support for the idea of greater washingdum. You are both idiots with sub-par intelligence. You both spam here nonstop. You are both decrepit, senile, seniors with multiple mental disorders with an endless obsession with ‘nazis’. So see, you may both be ‘little’ in the grand scheme of things, as hard as it is for both of your egos to accept, but you’re managed to get around that by becoming the biggest idiots here.

    And living in multiple polar world…does that mean you have a third sock planned to join in the fray?

  15. Davy on Sat, 19th May 2018 2:20 pm 

    weasel kind of like what you and mm share in common. Two millennial waste case basement dwellers. You tried school and now you got lots of debt and living in mom’s basement. Nobody will hire you two waste cases so you come here and create noise all day long.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *