Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on May 19, 2017

Bookmark and Share

The New Oil Reality

Public Policy

7 Comments on "The New Oil Reality"

  1. kanon on Fri, 19th May 2017 7:30 pm 

    “The oil industry is more than 150 years old, and oil ‘should’ be getting more expensive to find and to pump, not less.”

    I thought the oil price was still above the long term average, but that can’t last given the “forces that are making oil and gas so much cheaper and easier to find and extract.” It won’t be a problem, since everything is becoming so much more productive. This will be especially helpful with the really deep water oil and the kerogen shale oil. But I am a contrarian and I expect this means solar power will be our last best hope.

  2. eugene on Fri, 19th May 2017 8:58 pm 

    If I just shovel enough bullshit, I’ll find a miracle.

  3. Sissyfuss on Fri, 19th May 2017 9:09 pm Oh gee, they sound like a nice objective swell bunch of guys.

  4. rockman on Fri, 19th May 2017 11:00 pm 

    “… the famed oil historian Daniel Yergin”. Fortunately an early warning that allowed me to stop reading then. But I still read the posts.

    kanon – “… and oil ‘should’ be getting more expensive to find and to pump, not less.” As the Rockman has explained many times before: exploration for conventional oil/NG targets is so much easier today then when he started 40 years ago. And 3d seismic is a very big reason. Search yourselves for the details. But this IS NOT an exaggeration. Productivity of seismic exploration back then: it would take 5 very experienced geophysicists 6 months to map the same area with 2d seismic that one geophysicist 1 month to do today. And it wouldn’t take a room filling mainframe computer: it could be done with the CPU sitting under the Rockman’s desk. And so much data instantly available he has three 24” monitors on his desk. And the quality of the 1 month of 3d work would be 5X better then that 6 month output.

    Again: not an exaggeration. Add an incredible increase in some trends: as much as 15% increasing to 80% was not uncommon. Thus while 3d seismic lead to many discoveries it cut the number of dry holes even more. It became so successful, depending on the trend, management would not even review a prospect that didn’t have 3d coverage. And even before 3d became game changer 2d seismic processing improved the success rate tremendously: using a new 2d seismic attribute in the later 80’s the Rockman hit 23 out of 25 small stratigraphic traps in a trend with a ore-seismic success rate of less then 10%.

    When you take into account the savings in manpower and the dry holes it cost much less per bbl to find a new commercial conventional reservoir today then it did 40 years ago. Of course many will have trouble accepting that FACT given all the bullsh*t tossed out by all the “experts” that never generated a prospect themselves.

    But read these words carefully: it is much easier to find the remaining CONVENTIONAL reservoirs today then ever before. Which is not the same as saying it’s easier to find MORE conventional reservoirs. Especially the larger ones. Which explains why the volume of new discoveries have decreased while the ability to find them has improved significantly: there are much fewer left to find.

    That covers exploration of CONVENTIONAL reservoirs. There’s been no exploration needed of the UNCONVENTIONAL plays like the Eagle Ford and Bakken: both were proven to contain producible hydrocarbons more the 5 decades ago. Now we’re switch the conversation from the ease of FINDING vs the ease of EXTRACTING hydrocarbons. Not going to detail that: if you don’t understand now you never will. LOL. But having more productive methods for extracting oil/NG alone from the unconventional reservoirs wasn’t enough to cause the production boom: it also took record high oil prices. And even though that tech has improved with continued tweaking significant drilling still requires the current oil price that is still well above the historic average.

    So no: conventyional oil/NG should be less expensive to find over time. Just as it should become more difficult to find as much production as we have in the past. And unconventional oil/NG reservoir should becomes easier to produce as tech improves. Tech that will require higher oil prices to justify the expense of that tech. For instance after making a conventional reservoir at 6,000′ feet the well completion may cost $600,000. But an unconventional reservoir at 6,000′ completed in a horizontal well bore can still cost $4 million today.

    No: to understand the current dynamics of both conventional and unconventional reservoir development takes more then a few simplistic statements.

  5. rockman on Sat, 20th May 2017 7:49 am 

    “Even deep waters offshore can now produce at less than $50.” And another example of someone making up an economic limit that has no basis in reality. Even a DW field of modest size (100 million bbls) would gross $5 BILLION and net at least $3.5 BILLION on average. IOW very economical at $50/bbl. Now consider the 300+ million bbls: very economic at $20/bbl…or less. So yes: DW fields are very expensive to develop. But also produce the highest per well URR. A great onshore well might recover 500,000 bbls of oil. But a DW well with a million estimated URR wouldn’t be drilled. Individual DW wells can each recover 10 to 30 MILLION BBLS.

    Which also emphasizes the point that there is no one oil price that reservoirs in any trend, like the Eagle Ford Shale, are economic to develop. Which is why EFS wells are being drilled and producing profitably at $45/bbl today. And that’s despite claims by armchair experts that all shale wells need $60+/bbl to worth drilling. Some wells would be drilled at $25/bbl…just not as many. Likewise there are many EFS wells that would not be worth drilling at $90/bbl.

    They toss out such bullsh*t numbers because they understand little about the process or too lazy to explain the details.

  6. green_achers on Sat, 20th May 2017 12:06 pm 

    Hey, everybody, we’re all going to be RICH!*

    *In information. Does not apply to food.

  7. Hamster on Tue, 23rd May 2017 11:51 am 

    Not long ago, I read an article here that contained a statement to the effect that in 2016, we used three times as much oil as we found. There is long time delay built into the system, but eventually the cumulative effect of consumption wildly outpacing discoveries will bite. As to when that will occur, it is an occupational hazard of armchair Cassandras to call it too early.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *