Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on March 3, 2017

Bookmark and Share

Should Israel Fear The Peak Oil Crisis?

Should Israel Fear The Peak Oil Crisis? thumbnail

Conventional wisdom suggests that the world economy is in a slow but steady recovery from the 2008 financial crisis. Some economists, however, including Nafeez Ahmed, author of several books including “A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It,” are sounding the alarm about a looming global redux of that crisis rooted in natural resource scarcity, particularly oil. This alarming scenario, outlined by Ahmed in a recent article on Medium titled “Brace for the Oil, Food and Financial Crash of 2018,” foresees in 2018 a terrifying confluence of expensive oil, spiking food prices, a debt-fueled financial crisis, and depressed economic growth, with all of the attendant socio-political tensions we have seen in recent years accelerating. Think Trump, Brexit and the Arab Spring meet stagflation. Could this be bad news for Israel, in its arid, oil-drenched, and politically fragile neighborhood?

Let’s consider for a moment Ahmed’s foreboding forecast. Citing a recent HSBC report on global oil markets, Ahmed highlights impending production declines across wide swaths of the oil industry. These theories have been around for a number of years, but they have generally taken a back seat in the public eye since oil prices crashed in late 2014 from over $100 per barrel to below $30, and have remained relatively low (currently about $53). Ahmed emphasizes HSBC’s point that the much-ballyhooed, U.S.-based shale oil revolution cannot offset the precipitous decline in giant oil fields’ production that is already underway, requiring the equivalent of four new Saudi Arabias just to keep current production on level in 2030. The result? Oil output begins to slide off a cliff, leaving the world vulnerable to a supply shock the likes of which triggered the notorious oil crisis of the 1970s. Then, as oil prices rise, so do food prices and other commodities requiring transportation, as in the oil price run-up from 2008 to 2011. Ahmed points to a group of Italian economists predicting oil prices won’t quite rise high enough (say, to $75/barrel) to make it profitable to extract ever-less-available oil, keeping supply scarce.

Adding to the potential for an economic collapse, posits Ahmed, is the fact that governments and consumers currently maintain historically high levels of debt. Consequently, as energy prices rise, causing inflation, consumers and governments will not be able to borrow their way out of the cash crunch, and will feel the sharp pinch of higher prices that loose debt markets have been hiding.

Before we jump out the nearest window, let’s ponder two questions: Is Ahmed’s scenario likely to happen? And if it does, will Israel suffer?

First, on oil prices. While Ahmed and HSBC are serious sources of analysis – Ahmed likes to point out that he successfully predicted the 2008 financial crisis – they do not have a monopoly on commodity market insights, nor a crystal ball. Oil price predictions for the coming year are all over the map, from $10 to $90 per barrel. This is typical. An equally resonant oil prediction bombshell fell last June when pundit Gary Shilling, author of “The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for a Decade of Slow Growth and Deflation,” doubled down on his $10/barrel oil prediction. (Incidentally, Shilling predicts a decline in oil of this magnitude would also produce a serious recession, just as would a price spike.) Will we have an oil supply crisis and subsequent price spike? We might, and we might not.

Then there are the questions of whether future energy markets – even the near future – will look like the past. Carbon Tracker published a brilliant report in late 2015 questioning the assumptions about future energy demand, particularly for oil and other fossil fuels. Among the suspect presumptions made by most analysts, Carbon Tracker noted the tendency to ignore the potential for high adoption rates of renewable energy, rapid uptake of energy efficiency technologies, slow population increases, and low economic growth. If any or some combination of these perfectly plausible – or even likely – scenarios comes to fruition, global demand for oil could crater.

Ahmed himself acknowledges, as does the aforementioned gaggle of Italian economists, that if cheap renewables win the race to replace oil demand before supply fails, the crisis can be averted. The plunge in costs of renewable energy and batteries is already upon us; the speed and scope of their uptake have been historically underestimated, a sad trend in punditry likely to continue. Another Carbon Tracker report issued earlier this year finds renewable energy is now cheaper than coal and gas for the first time. While short-term oil market bottlenecks could happen, the smart money is on renewables and electric cars breaking out in a big way, chopping oil demand off. After all, most oil is consumed by vehicles, so electrifying them changes the game.

And what about Israel? Even if financial doomsday does befall the West, Israel might be the best-prepared country to weather a global recession. Consider the economics. Israel has a high-performing, diversified economy. It survived the 2008 crisis better than most. It is a technology and venture capital giant and a knowledge economy dependent neither on imports nor exports of most raw materials. Exports represent only 31 percent of the economy, a figure that has been consistently dropping (even while export volumes themselves are stable, led by electronics, pharmaceuticals, metal goods and diamonds); this is an astonishingly low figure for a small, wealthy country. That means Israel can survive a global contraction that reduces demand for its goods and services.

Israel also would not be crippled by an oil crisis. Israeli oil consumption has been dropping steadily since the 1990s. Though its first big push into electric cars failed, Israeli companies are at the forefront of electric car battery startups, and could transition the small, densely populated country to electric or compressed natural gas cars fairly easily if needed. How? Relying on massive domestic natural gas reserves and abundant solar power capacity, which grew ten-fold from 2010 to 2014, with more coming.

As for food, Israeli agricultural and food companies are global technology leaders, helping the country cope with climate change, drought, water scarcity and temperature extremes. Israel produces 95% of its own food needs. Perhaps most importantly, Israel stands to profit from high food prices by exporting its agro-technologies to other needy countries.

On the security front, plunging oil revenues in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries could be destabilizing, as could bread riots in Egypt or climate refugee crises in Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and elsewhere. Proxy wars between Saudi Arabia and Iran are inflaming the entire Middle East. But these crises are already here, and it’s hard to argue Israel hasn’t held up extraordinarily well since 2011 through the series of political, social, and military conflagrations in its back yard. What’s a bit more social unrest?

Call me a glib Pollyanna, but here’s the truth: Israel stands to make out just fine regardless of what oil, food, and financial markets have in store for the next few years. The rest of the world, however, not so much.

Andrew Eil managed climate change foreign assistance programs at the U.S. State Department from 2010 to 2014 and is now an independent consultant in New York City.


35 Comments on "Should Israel Fear The Peak Oil Crisis?"

  1. onlooker on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 3:36 pm 

    Humanity should fear PO

  2. penury on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 5:34 pm 

    As we used to say All hat and no cattle.

  3. Antius on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 5:37 pm 

    In another 5 years, we will know. Solar thermal power works a lot better in Israel than in damp, dark northern Europe and has half decent EROI. High quality heat from solar collectors can be stored efficiently to cover intermittency. Maybe it will work.

  4. Jerome Purtzer on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 5:40 pm 

    I love the historically high debt level comment, I would add that it is hysterical as well-complete theater of the absurd. When the printing presses cool down people will start laughing like a madhouse! The biggest problem the banks have is that they keep giving the money to the super rich who keep creating derivative games to make even more make believe money. If they wanted to goose the economy they should give it to the poor 99%ers-they would spend it.

  5. Jerome Purtzer on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 5:48 pm 

    Everyone seems to forget the Australian Oil Field study done over 10 years ago that concluded that no matter what people might do that after 2017 they won’t be able to keep up with the aggregate decline rates world wide. Of course the Australian Government tried to repress the study that they paid for.

  6. Mr. Pockets on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 8:15 pm 

    debt is not historically high?

  7. alain LE GARGASSON on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 8:46 pm 

    In the next 10 years Israel has nothing to fear, but as it is a country at war with its neighbors, what will happen in 50 years to the armies of this country without mineral resources, petroleum and umbrella US? Israel will have interest in making peace before, since it is much lower numerically

  8. Per Fagereng on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 9:21 pm 

    What about climate change? Israel is very close to the hottest area of the world, and it’s getting worse. In twenty years it may see the climate of Death Valley.

  9. Antius on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 9:46 pm 

    I don’t think climate change will be the biggest problem. Israel is surrounded by Islamic heathen baying for Jewish blood. If their defences weaken, they will be overrun. People that talk about peace between Israel and its neighbours do not understand the Muslim way of thinking.

  10. makati1 on Fri, 3rd Mar 2017 10:32 pm 

    You are correct on that one Antius. Climate change will be the least of the worries for Israel. Except that it may speed up the coming religious war there as the other countries get desperate. And, Israel has nukes. It is the likely place for a nuclear war to begin, I think. I would not be surprised if the Saudis and the Iranians have nukes. Bought from other sources like N.Korea or Pakistan. We live in interesting times.

  11. ________________________________________ on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 12:09 am 

    The chosen/untouchable jew has another spokesman. All this special treatment really messed with their head. Bet you think for every holy jew that feels insulted you deserve more land in the ME.
    Israel is in the worst position. Muslim states will not be able afford food. When there is no food there is pillaging no mater how many a-bombs you have.

  12. GregT on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 12:26 am 

    An epic Middle East heat wave could be global warming’s hellish curtain-raiser

    “Record-shattering temperatures this summer have scorched countries from Morocco to Saudi Arabia and beyond, as climate experts warn that the severe weather could be a harbinger of worse to come.”

    “In coming decades, U.N. officials and climate scientists predict that the mushrooming populations of the Middle East and North Africa will face extreme water scarcity, temperatures almost too hot for human survival and other consequences of global warming.”

    “This incredible weather shows that climate change is already taking a toll now and that it is — by far — one of the biggest challenges ever faced by this region”

  13. forbin on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 2:17 am 

    What’s a bit more social unrest?

    small point but it won’t be a “bit”

    Egypt goes the way of Syria? 93 million people and half leave the country . they wont go south but north , they wont go west to Libya but east to Israel (?)

    I do wonder ……

  14. peakyeast on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 5:57 am 

    The 0.1% people should have their own economic system – apart from the ordinary people.

    There they can sit and compete with each others as to who can write the biggest number into a computer – so they can feel superior compared to the other 0.1%ers…

  15. malahmadi on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 8:54 am 

    Dear Antius, Muslims and Jaws lived together peacefully for hundred of years.Muslims saved the Jaws from massacres in Spain. When someone occupy your land regardless of your religion you will fight him.Muslims problems is not with the Jaws but with Zionism.

  16. Cloggie on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 9:16 am 

    Dear Antius, Muslims and Jaws lived together peacefully for hundred of years.Muslims saved the Jaws from massacres in Spain.

    Dear malahmadi,

    Sure, with the Muslims in control and the “Jaws” tolerated. I’m sure the Israelis can’t wait to see the situation of el-Andaluz repeated in

    When someone occupy your land regardless of your religion you will fight him.

    You bet. Therefor as soon as we managed to get rid of the Anglo-Zionists as our overlords, in a matter of a few years, I’ll leave as an exercise for you to figure out what is going to happen to these folks:

    Muslims problems is not with the Jaws but with Zionism.

    The Europeans love Zionism under the motto: every “Jaw” who is in Israel is not here in Europe, promoting communism or multiculturalism.

  17. Survivalist on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 9:01 pm 

    Israel is so far past screwed that the light from screwed won’t reach them for 1.3 Billion years.

  18. makati1 on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 10:03 pm 

    Most Jews don’t live in Israel:
    World Total 14,200,000
    Israel 6,399,000
    United States 5,300,000
    France France 465,000
    Canada Canada 385,000
    United Kingdom 269,568
    Russia Russia 186,000
    Philippines ~100 Another reason I like it here.

  19. joe on Sat, 4th Mar 2017 10:20 pm 

    Malahamdi I am sorry but you are not right about your Spanish jews comment. The Spanish jews fled to and we’re accepted by the Ottoman Empire in what is today Turkey/Syria/Israel/Jordan/Egypt/Saudi Arabia/Greece/Bosnia/Croatia/Romania/Bulgaria oh and of course Iraq/Armenia/Crimea/ and tons of small islands. So whats my point? Many and most of these countries were at the time of the Spanish exodus were at least 50% or more CHRISTIAN ruled over by Muslims who were happy to rule as a powerful minority. But power politics and 19th/20th century nationalism caused so many genocides that most of these countries are ethnically and religiously cleansed and seperate, Uthmans Dream became a nightmare. The Spanish Jews joined a multicultural experiment that failed when it ran out of money and could not exploit the oil it had, Western Europe (EU) has not paid attention to what happens when you don’t learn from history. Much pain awaits. They did not learn from Mostar.

  20. Davy on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 5:45 am 

    This board is so extremist on the Jewish issue. I get so tired of the 20th century Jew hype being talked about today as if they really matter. They matter less and less and do not deserve the amount of discussion they get here. Jews and Jew haters alike are so passé. This is the 21st century and we have so many other more pressing issues. Screw the holy land and all those who live there. Screw the conspiracy theories on Jews.

  21. Cloggie on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 6:02 am 

    Malahamdi I am sorry but you are not right about your Spanish jews comment. The Spanish jews fled to and we’re accepted by the Ottoman Empire in what is today Turkey

    Far more consequential for the fate of Anglosphere today was that they also migrated to Holland [*], where the Dutch had invented the catastrophic “freedom of religion” meme. The Protestant Dutch needed that meme to create a “safe space” for themselves in a dominant Catholic Europe in their battle against Catholic Spain (1568-1648) and later (1672) against Catholic Britain, France and German bishops.

    In 1688 the Dutch prevailed with their conquest of Britain and Northern Ireland.

    But how was it possible that a nation of 2 million could generate the resources to invade and conquer a nation (Britain and Northern Ireland) of 10 million with the purpose of robbing British resources and keep another nation of 23 million (Louis-XIV-France) in check and as such prevent the destruction of Protestant bulwark Holland by its far larger Catholic neighbors?


    William III was subsidized by a wealthy Marrano Jew from The Hague (Francisco Suasso) on the following conditions: if the expedition to Britain fails, no problem, the money is gone. But if you succeed, you need to create a Bank of England, to be run by Jews.

    Although the Protestant Cromwell had opened England door for Jews again in 1656 after king Edward I had thrown them out in 1290 and created a period aka “Merry Olde England”, the Dutch invasion meant that the Jews landed at the heart of English society. 1688 was the date that Anglo-Zionism was born, a model that would be exported to the later United States and prevail until November 2016, much to the disgust of our forum buddy apneaman (“Friedman-Friday”).

    Why did the Jews financially support the Dutch invasion of England? Because they wanted that the implicit Jew-friendly Protestant religion (via “freedom of religion”) would prevail in England, a larger country than Holland and directly access its finances.

    [*] one of them was a Marrano noble man named Rossocampo, which in Dutch translates to Roosevelt. He settled in Haarlem in 1620 but apparently didn’t like the weather too much and in 1649 he decided to move to the Dutch colony Nieuw Amsterdam in America, never to be heard of again.

  22. Cloggie on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 6:13 am 

    This board is so extremist on the Jewish issue. I get so tired of the 20th century Jew hype being talked about today as if they really matter. They matter less and less and do not deserve the amount of discussion they get here.

    That’s because you are in deep denial about what is really going on in America. You don’t want to have it true that they run your country and, as Mel Gibson correctly identified, were behind all the wars over the last century.

    Even PC Dutch television leftists can no longer ignore the truth about the “Israel Lobby”:

    It suffices to watch [14:50-17:57].

    Read Mearsheimer-Walt.
    Identify who brought Obama to power and who were the most important donors of Hillary Clinton.
    Without these folks no US entry in WW1.
    Without them no FED
    Without them no communism in Russia.
    Without them no WW2.
    Without them no JFK murder.
    Without them no neocons, 9/11 and Iraq.
    Without them no overthrow of Kiev government.
    Without them no Syria.

    So why should be ignore them?

  23. Davy on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 6:25 am 

    Clog, you are among the best for fantasy discussions and history revisions. I did not say they were completely irrelevant. I said it is replete with makatiland distorted agendas and delusional fictions. It does not represent the importance you Jewish conspiracy talking extremist make it out to be. We are in a new century and your 20th century obsessions are passé. We have much more powerful issues at play. You guys are just stuck in a rut. I don’t even read much of what you guys put out on the subject because it is mostly noise. Maybe at one time it meant something but it is mostly a circular argument with you guys. Today in our failing world it has little meaning. Clog who the frig cares about all your WWII history revisions. I don’t believe the mainstream story line of WWII but I sure and the hell don’t believe much of what you talk about especially from your Eurocentric point of view. I admire you on many topics but your history revisions and racism are not among them.

  24. Boat on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 8:59 am 

    Clog must watch Jewish porn and have little dick syndrome. There are not enough Jews to influence much. 1 Warren Buffet/Gates team equals the financial empire of most Jew billionaire. PS Clog, right after Pearl Harbor attacks the Germans declared war on the US. I dought the Jews were consulted.

  25. Cloggie on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 9:26 am 

    Clog, right after Pearl Harbor attacks the Germans declared war on the US. I dought the Jews were consulted.

    They had to because they were allied with Japan.

    The Americans have long stopped declaring war on anybody, they just invade and shoot, against international law.
    “I may never declare war; I may make war. If I were to ask Congress to declare war they might argue about it for three months.” By the Fall of 1941, the U.S. Navy was already in a state of undeclared war with Germany, and the pressure was being increased against Japan.

    The US Navy long before Pearl Harbor hunted German subs in the Atlantic, without telling the US public about and pretending to be neutral, in the hope to provoke incidents. The Germans who were not interested in any war whatsoever, desperately tried to avoid the American provocations.

    America was never neutral but had declared war on Germany as of 1933:

    The war with Japan was totally provoked by the US, they knew Pearl Harbor was coming as the intentional result of the imposed oil boycott and Roosevelt wanted it to happen, because he wanted to destroy and conquer Europe.

    And before you get a big mouth again about “kicking German ass” you should realize that we Europeans are the only ones who can come to your aid if the US sinks away into chaos of civil war. You don’t have that many friends any more after the entire world meanwhile understands what the US is up to.

    Trump-Bannon have no other intention than to destroy the globalist establishment.

    In a 2014 speech, Steve Bannon, Trump’s chief strategist, cited the Fascist Italian philosopher Julius Evola, who argued that “changing the system is not a question of contesting and polemicizing, but of blowing everything up.”

    You should never forget my little devirilized globalist Swedish friends with US passport, that the world is full of people with scores to settle with wannebee imperialist types like you:

    – 1300 million Chinese
    – 150 million Russians with thousands of nukes
    – European right-wingers who hate that the US overlord has imposed multiculturalism on them
    – More than half of the US population, all armed to the teeth, who have enough of the old globalist Washington

    But you are probably too stupid to understand the precarious situation folks like you are in and keep believing in American Exceptionalism.

  26. Boat on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 10:03 am 


    By destroying the Japanese in WWII the US essentially freed China from the Japanese who had killed approx 20 million Chinese. They know that. I see no war with China.

    Look up gun stats in the US. Most have none and a very small percentage have many. Another widely false talking point by crazies like you.

    Nukes, lots of countries have nukes. Pakistan could take out the world with nukes. Nukes are yesterday’s news.

    You live in fear like many. You manufacture dream like war scenarios in your mind like mak. At the end of of the day the US has to come down. Lol yet the years go by with skirmishes and no wars. The US is fine, the world is fine.

  27. joe on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 10:24 am 

    Cloggie posting links to what, ‘radio Islam’. Sure, I’m gonna trust you on historical accuracy dude, cos that’s smart, right? I trust you man.

  28. Cloggie on Sun, 5th Mar 2017 4:59 pm 

    Cloggie posting links to what, ‘radio Islam’. Sure, I’m gonna trust you on historical accuracy dude, cos that’s smart, right?

    joe, are you really such a simpleton that you seriously believe that some Muslim photoshops the British newspaper the Daily Express using the headline: “Judea Declares War on Germany” on March 24, 1933???

    You can easily verify it from different source. The medium and the message, two different things.

    Canadian interviews Geert Wilders. Elections March 15.

  29. Cloggie on Mon, 6th Mar 2017 6:23 am 

    By destroying the Japanese in WWII the US essentially freed China from the Japanese who had killed approx 20 million Chinese.

    Ridiculous figure. Google a little and you arrive at 6 million Asians during WW2. The Japanese colonization of Manchuria, before December 1941, took far less casualties and was carried out with the full approval of the US, who saw in Japan an effective counterweight against Russia in East-Asia.

    The only reason why the US changed course and desired war with Japan was because it gave them the opportunity to join the war in Europe against Germany, thanks to Japan joining the Axis with Germany (war against Germany via the Japanese back door).

    So spare me these fake references to non-existing American “humanitarian concerns”.

    What you should do boat, is increase your understanding of history a little and for instance read the February 17, 1941 Time-Life article “The American Century”. That was published 10 months before Roosevelt managed to maneuver Japan into war with the US in Pearl Harbor. The article was intended to prepare the American public for war, a war that the US had planned since 1933 and could afford, now that it owned almost 30% global GDP. The title says it all: we may be a provincial geopolitical backwater now, but this century is going to be American, because we intend to plant our big ass into everybody else his face.

    And so it happened and it was all by design. And afterwards in Nuremberg they organized a little show trial to erase all the traces, invent a holocaust and pimp yourself as the big noble liberator, together with the Soviets, the largest criminals on the planet until 1945.

    After that date your noble Chinese broke the genocidal record by killing up to 100 million of their own kind.

  30. christopher hitchens on Mon, 6th Mar 2017 3:10 pm 

    webmaster , plz dont post pro creationist articles here . and specialy not pro juwe ones . ffs

  31. Apneaman on Mon, 6th Mar 2017 7:17 pm 

    Hair clog, you dried up old Nazi fuck, like I said they never hanged enough of your fellow Nazi scum at Nuremberg or made the Germany people pay for their collusion nearly enough.

    Oh well, I guess we can still enjoy the pictures of Germany in rubble – ha ha.

    I hear in the fire bombings it sucked the lungs right out of people.

    Let’s reminisce shall we…

    Dresden Bombing With Footage of Allied Aerial Assault on Pforzheim and Cologne Germany

    The ruins of Dresden, 1945

    You’re going to die a bitter loser Nazi, hair clog. All your ideas of revenge and a new german Reich are the fantasy of a stupid old man.

  32. Midnight Oil on Mon, 6th Mar 2017 10:35 pm 

    One thing, though, Apneaman, is those Nazi things had really sharp uniform style.
    Derr Führer himself gave final approval.
    Maybe Adolf missed his true calling…
    Side story, one model for a new uniform volunteered to explode a hidden bomb in a coat pocket while Derr Führer examined the new line for 1944. Seems AH had a feral nose for danger
    and looking from afar giving his thumbs up like Donald Trump!
    That’s a shame because Germany got the most damage and casualties in late 1944 to the bitter end.
    Talk about overstaying your welcome!

  33. Cloggie on Tue, 7th Mar 2017 3:57 am 

    Oh well, I guess we can still enjoy the pictures of Germany in rubble – ha ha.

    Still angry about this, Friedman?


    You can say what you want about the Austrian, but at least he surely thoroughly cleaned Europe up from you folks before he got beaten by the Anglo-Soviet mob. The result was that after you got a thorough delousing, after the war you went to either Israel of the US. Now the US has the termite problem and won’t survive this event. Because you know, termites can’t build a house, they can only destroy an existing one, regardless how solidly build.

    I hear in the fire bombings it sucked the lungs right out of people.

    Still mad about Bergen-Belsen, are we?

    It is likely that Anne Frank is among them. This “useless eater” strangely survived the Schwitz and volunteered to flee with the Germans westwards, rather than become “liberated” by the Soviets. In the end typhus destroyed her, not the Germans. It were the conditions created by the Alllies that got here killed. A good Jewish lawyer, provided he is paid enough, could even make the case that Anne Frank was killed by the Alllies, not he Germans, because the Alllies conducted policies that ensured that as many as possible civilians would die in their effort to colonize Germany and the rest Europe, together with their Soviet buddies. I always wondered why they endeavored to make a girl the icon of the holocaust who was killed by typhus. But perhaps they couldn’t find a girl who wrote a diary AND was gassed. Perhaps they couldn’t a girl who was gassed in the first place. It is fascinating if you dig a little into the history of the persons who appeared in The Diary. Hundred or so. After the war there were quite a few who raised their finger… “I survived!” Only a few could have been gassed. Perhaps not. If you apply the rules of combinatorial statistics to the survivors of the folks starring in The Diary, the story begins to stink, and not of Zyklon-B.

    All your ideas of revenge and a new German Reich are the fantasy of a stupid old man.

    Revenge? Who is talking about revenge? How would that revenge look like? Should continental Europeans take revenge by bombing American cities? I don’t think so, because…

    1. Europeans are not Americans
    2. The poor black folks who currently live in those US cities wouldn’t know by which truck they were hit

    No, a better approach would be to let you kosher folks work for European interests for a change and drag as many non-whites into the US and the rest of Anglosphere as possible, bringing the Euro’s to ever greater levels of despair… until the moment arrives that the entire diversity pie explodes in their faces. A financial meltdown could very well become the trigger. Folks like makati and GregT and Ghung, fine green-liberals and with zero ethnic pride…. um make that “with zero Neo-Nazi tendencies” … already anticipate that event and decided to dig themselves in, c.q. relocate. Fine canaries in the coal mine, they.

    [part 1]

  34. Cloggie on Tue, 7th Mar 2017 3:58 am 

    Dresden Bombing With Footage of Allied Aerial Assault on Pforzheim and Cologne Germany

    Dresden is fine these days, thank you very much.

    And who is talking about a new German Reich?

    European grandeur has already been restored in Russia, the Europeans will follow soon. And despite all the wishful Anglo thinking about the EU imploding soon, the reality is that the European political roof is here to stay. Timeline:

    EGKS – 1952
    EEC – 1958
    EC – 1973
    EU – 1993
    Continental Confederation – 202x (“Paris-Berlin-Moscow”)

    Putin is ready for it…

    …and so is the European Right that wants to replace the EU with something more “identitarian”. And they all want to buddy with Russia.
    The rationale behind that confederation will be the unstopable rise of China of 1350 million and Sunny Islam of 1500 million.

    [part 2]

  35. Cloggie on Tue, 7th Mar 2017 4:00 am 

    And interestingly, there are quite a few identitarian Americans these days who don’t mind being called “European”:

    All they need to do is to get rid of the globalists:

    The Euro-identitarians can expect help from Europe, 1776-style. After all, a Mississippi basin hinterland is a nice to have for Eurosphere, just to ensure that the old guard can’t return and buddy up with China.

    Me, the stupid old man, doesn’t worry about a thing.

    [part 3]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *