Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on April 22, 2014

Bookmark and Share

NTSB head: Oil tanker rail ‘safety has been compromised’

NTSB head: Oil tanker rail ‘safety has been compromised’ thumbnail

Rail tank cars near oil rigs

The recent spate of accidents in the U.S. and Canada involving trains carrying crude oil demonstrates that “far too often, safety has been compromised,” the head of the top U.S. transportation safety agency said today.

The amount of crude oil transported on railroads — shipments that frequently pass through the Chicago area — has more than quadrupled since 2005, and some of it is especially volatile, said National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah Hersman.

That extra volatility increases the likelihood of a violent fire in a derailment, Hersman said. The transport of ethanol, the most frequently shipped hazardous material in the railway system, has also boomed, she said.

“With so much flammable liquid carried by rail, it is incumbent upon the rail industry, shippers, and regulators to ensure that these hazardous materials are being moved safely,” Hersman said.  She spoke in Washington D.C. at the opening of a two-day forum on improving the safety of crude oil and ethanol shipments.

The NTSB believes that older models of the type of tank car used to transport crude oil and ethanol, known as the DOT-111, are not safe to carry hazardous liquids.

Trains carrying cars like these can be seen nearly every day passing through Chicago and suburbs. Two Chicago aldermen proposed banning the railroad tank cars from the city, but that effort has stalled.

Hersman cited the loss of lives and the destruction that occurred after fiery derailments like the one on July 6, 2013 in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, and on June 19, 2009 in Cherry Valley, Ill., near Rockford.

In the Cherry Valley incident, 15 DOT-111s carrying ethanol derailed. The leaking fuel ignited, causing a massive fireball. One woman was fatally burned and 600 homes within a half-mile radius were evacuated.

The NTSB concluded in a report on that derailment that the design of the older DOT-111 cars made them “susceptible to damage and catastrophic loss of hazardous material.”

Testifying Tuesday at the NTSB forum were representatives from the petroleum and rail industries, who discussed tank car design, crash worthiness, and railroad operations.  Also testifying were researchers who reviewed safety systems and ways to reduce risks.

The NTSB recommended in 2009 that all new and existing tank cars in crude oil and ethanol service be equipped with additional safety design features, including enhanced puncture resistance systems, top fittings protection and bottom outlet valves that remain closed during accidents.

Two federal agencies, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and the Federal Railroad Administration, are developing a proposed rule to update the federal design standards for DOT-111 tank cars.

Although the petroleum and rail industry and federal regulators agree that new standards are needed, they are divided over whether the requirements should be more stringent than a voluntary industry standard adopted in 2011.

Karen Darch, the village president of Barrington and co-chair of a coalition of suburbs calling for tighter standards on the DOT-111s, said Tuesday she is pleased the NTSB is focusing attention on the problem.

Darch and Aurora Mayor Tom Weisner have expressed alarm as ever-increasing crude oil shipments move through their communities.

But the government’s ongoing testing, quest for consensus among industry and regulators and failure to issue a new tank car rule is “hampering progress toward greater safety,” Darch said.

“Industry does not want to invest in new tank cars until (the U.S. Department of Transportation) has the standard out,” Darch said. “It cannot come quickly enough for us.”

Chicago Tribune



4 Comments on "NTSB head: Oil tanker rail ‘safety has been compromised’"

  1. Makati1 on Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 3:10 am 

    Ah, all we need to do is hire a few thousand men to ride the rails with the oil tankers…lol. Or to actually rebuild our decrepit railroads. No money? Yeh, it’s all going to the Military/Security Industrial Complex To support those 1,000 terrorist bases we man and the many billions of rounds of ammo for the Social Security, Forestry, IRS, etc. branches of the government.

  2. Davy, Hermann, MO on Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 5:39 am 

    Mak, the US has one of the best and most efficient freight rail networks in the world just google! Sure the passenger rail is horrible but hey get your facts right.

  3. Makati1 on Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 9:28 am 

    Hahahaha….you make me laugh, Davy.

  4. rockman on Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 3:03 pm 

    I actually don’t recall any of the accidents involving failure of the tracks themselves so I’m not sure how having anyone walk the tracks would be of any benefit. There was nothing won with the tracks in the Canadian town that blew up.

    Also, for more than half a century, probable several million tanker loads of material much more volatile/explosive than the worst crude oil has been shipped by rail. In 2013 tank cars exploded in Baltimore which were even carrying hydrocarbons: Authorities are attributing the explosion on a derailed freight train near Baltimore to the chemical cargo in one of the cars.

    The explosion was reportedly felt throughout Baltimore and a plume of smoke could be seen for miles. CSX Transportation Co. spokesman Gary Sease said Wednesday that sodium chlorate in a car that derailed Tuesday in Rosedale exploded. He says the explosion ignited another chemical, terephthlaic acid, from a second derailed car. Sodium chlorate is used mainly as a bleaching agent in paper production.

    Maybe the accidents involving oil just rate better coverage because everyone naturally hates oil companies and don’t have a problem with companies that make toilet paper. LOL.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *