Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on March 31, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Koreas Trade Fire

Koreas Trade Fire thumbnail

North and South Korea fired hundreds of artillery shells into each other’s waters Monday in a flare-up of animosity that forced residents of five front-line South Korean islands to evacuate to shelters for several hours, South Korean officials said.

The exchange of fire into the Yellow Sea followed Pyongyang’s sudden announcement that it would conduct live-fire drills in seven areas north of the Koreas’ disputed maritime boundary. North Korea routinely test-fires artillery and missiles into the ocean but rarely discloses those plans in advance. The announcement was seen as an expression of Pyongyang’s frustration at making little progress in its recent push to win outside aid.

North Korea fired 500 rounds of artillery shells over more than three hours, about 100 of which fell south of the sea boundary, South Korean Defense Ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok said. South Korea responded by firing 300 shells into North Korean waters, he said.

No shells from either side were fired at any land or military installations, but Kim called the North’s artillery firing a provocation aimed at testing Seoul’s security posture. There was no immediate comment from North Korea.

In Washington, White House spokesman Jonathan Lalley called North Korea’s actions “dangerous and provocative” and said they would further aggravate tensions in the region.

Monday’s exchange was relatively mild in the history of animosity and violence between the Koreas, but there is worry in Seoul that an increasingly dissatisfied North Korea could repeat the near-daily barrage of war rhetoric it carried out last spring, when tensions soared as Pyongyang threatened nuclear strikes on Washington and Seoul in response to condemnation of its third nuclear test.

Residents on front-line South Korean islands spent several hours in shelters during the firing, and officials temporarily halted ferry service linking the islands to the mainland. Kang Myeong-sung, speaking from a shelter on Yeonpyeong island, which is in sight of North Korean territory, said he didn’t hear any fighter jets but heard the boom of artillery fire.

The poorly marked western sea boundary has been the scene of several bloody naval skirmishes between the Koreas in recent years. In March 2010, a South Korean warship sank in the area following a torpedo attack blamed on Pyongyang that left 46 sailors dead. North Korea denies responsibility for the sinking. In November 2010, a North Korean artillery bombardment killed four South Koreans on Yeonpyeong.

The North has gradually dialed down its threats since last year’s tirade and has sought improved ties with South Korea in what foreign analysts say is an attempt to lure investment and aid. There has been no major breakthrough, however, with Washington and Seoul calling on the North to first take disarmament steps to prove its sincerity about improving ties.

Recent weeks have seen an increase in threatening rhetoric and a series of North Korean rocket and ballistic missile launches considered acts of protest by Pyongyang against annual ongoing springtime military exercises by Seoul and Washington. The North calls the South Korea-U.S. drills a rehearsal for invasion; the allies say they’re routine and defensive.

“The boneheads appear to have completely forgotten the fact that Yeonpyeong island was smashed by our military’s bolt of lightning a few years ago,” a North Korean military official, Yun Jong Bum, said Monday, according to the North’s official Korean Central News Agency.

Pyongyang also threatened Sunday to conduct a fourth nuclear test, though Seoul sees no signs it’s imminent. Wee Yong-sub, a deputy spokesman at the South Korean Defense Ministry, said the North Korean warning about the live-fire drills Monday was a “hostile” attempt to heighten tension on the Korean Peninsula.

Recent threats are an expression of anger and frustration over what the North sees as little improvement in progress in its ties with South Korea and the U.S., said Lim Eul Chul, a North Korea expert at South Korea’s Kyungnam University. Lim said the North might conduct a fourth nuclear test and launch other provocations to try to wrest the outside concessions it wants.

The Korean Peninsula remains in a technical state of war because the 1950-53 Korean War ended with an armistice, not a peace treaty. About 28,500 American troops are deployed in South Korea to deter potential aggression from North Korea.


7 Comments on "Koreas Trade Fire"

  1. Plantagenet on Mon, 31st Mar 2014 11:32 pm 

    After Russia’s invasion of the Crimea, now North Korea is very upset about the persecution of ethnic Koreans in South Korea. They reserve the right to intervene militarily in South Korea to protect Korean speakers.

  2. Rusty Baker on Mon, 31st Mar 2014 11:50 pm 

    How is this article related to Peak Oil? Can someone please explain the connection between North Korean aggression on South Korea and Peak Oil? I don’t see any.

  3. Makati1 on Tue, 1st Apr 2014 1:51 am 

    Plantgenet, you made a good point, but it will be lost on many here.

    It proves why most small countries want nukes. It keep the wolf (US) from attacking and/or trying regime change.

    The ability to destroy your neighbors in a few minutes makes you a ‘respected’, if not liked, enemy.

  4. Makati1 on Tue, 1st Apr 2014 2:50 am 

    BTW: If you are interested in the view outside the walls … you might look into the web site I found recently.

    “New Eastern Outlook”.

    Politics, economics and society.

  5. Stilgar Wilcox on Tue, 1st Apr 2014 7:40 am 

    “Can someone please explain the connection between North Korean aggression on South Korea and Peak Oil?”

    Tension around the world is rising as available net energy declines. There was a time when South Korea just took it so to speak when the North would do something outlandish, because they were doing so much better than the North they didn’t want to get into a skirmish, but now world finances are getting tighter due to declining net energy (peak oil plateau high price of oil) they now seem more willing to face off.

    Look at what happened in the Ukraine and Arab Spring. Scotland and Venice are both trying to attain independence from the UK and Italy. China’s claiming rights to the South Seas (for oil & NG) butting up against Japan and South Korea’s perceived rights. Unemployment in the EU is at critical levels. Things are getting tense and once oil descends from peak things are going to get very dicey.

    Just imagine what will happen as oil flow descends with prices rising causing riots to break out across the planet.

  6. Davy, Hermann, MO on Tue, 1st Apr 2014 10:00 am 

    Rustee, Maki’s new poster girl, North Korea, is an example of above ground peak oil dynamics. It represents geopolitical events that can be confidence shaking. If the socio-economic part of the equation gets shaken the supply and demand are effected by consequences. I think if you move up a level in PO understanding, you see that oil, like water, is a vital element to society. Since it is a vital element to society any actions physical or nonphysical affecting supply and demand will influence a PO date. I could give a rat’s ass about a date personally. I don’t knock those who care about a date. I am looking for the systematic nature of the dynamics of PO. I am focused on the financial side now more than ever because I see a financial correction as the clear and present danger.

  7. dsula on Tue, 1st Apr 2014 10:44 am 

    April 1st, anyone?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *