Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on February 19, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Currency And The Collapse Of The Roman Empire

Currency And The Collapse Of The Roman Empire thumbnail

At its peak, the Roman Empire held up to 130 million people over a span of 1.5 million square miles.

Rome had conquered much of the known world. The Empire built 50,000 miles of roads, as well as many aqueducts, amphitheatres, and other works that are still in use today.

Our alphabet, calendar, languages, literature, and architecture borrow much from the Romans. Even concepts of Roman justice still stand tall, such as being “innocent until proven guilty”.

So, as Visual Capitalist’s Jeff Desjardins’ asks, how could such a powerful empire collapse?

 

Courtesy of: The Money Project

 

The Roman Economy

Trade was vital to Rome. It was trade that allowed a wide variety of goods to be imported into its borders: beef, grains, glassware, iron, lead, leather, marble, olive oil, perfumes, purple dye, silk, silver, spices, timber, tin and wine.

Trade generated vast wealth for the citizens of Rome. However, the city of Rome itself had only 1 million people, and costs kept rising as the empire became larger.

Administrative, logistical, and military costs kept adding up, and the Empire found creative new ways to pay for things.

Along with other factors, this led to hyperinflation, a fractured economy, localization of trade, heavy taxes, and a financial crisis that crippled Rome.

Roman Debasement

The major silver coin used during the first 220 years of the empire was the denarius.

This coin, between the size of a modern nickel and dime, was worth approximately a day’s wages for a skilled laborer or craftsman. During the first days of the Empire, these coins were of high purity, holding about 4.5 grams of pure silver.

However, with a finite supply of silver and gold entering the empire, Roman spending was limited by the amount of denarii that could be minted.

This made financing the pet-projects of emperors challenging. How was the newest war, thermae, palace, or circus to be paid for?

Roman officials found a way to work around this. By decreasing the purity of their coinage, they were able to make more “silver” coins with the same face value. With more coins in circulation, the government could spend more. And so, the content of silver dropped over the years.

By the time of Marcus Aurelius, the denarius was only about 75% silver. Caracalla tried a different method of debasement. He introduced the “double denarius”, which was worth 2x the denarius in face value. However, it had only the weight of 1.5 denarii. By the time of Gallienus, the coins had barely 5% silver. Each coin was a bronze core with a thin coating of silver. The shine quickly wore off to reveal the poor quality underneath.

The Consequences

The real effects of debasement took time to materialize.

Adding more coins of poorer quality into circulation did not help increase prosperity – it just transferred wealth away from the people, and it meant that more coins were needed to pay for goods and services.

At times, there was runaway inflation in the empire. For example, soldiers demanded far higher wages as the quality of coins diminished.

“Nobody should have any money but I, so that I may bestow it upon the soldiers.” – Caracalla, who raised soldiers pay by 50% near 210 AD.

By 265 AD, when there was only 0.5% silver left in a denarius, prices skyrocketed 1,000% across the Roman Empire.
Only barbarian mercenaries were to be paid in gold.

The Effects

With soaring logistical and admin costs and no precious metals left to plunder from enemies, the Romans levied more and more taxes against the people to sustain the Empire.

Hyperinflation, soaring taxes, and worthless money created a trifecta that dissolved much of Rome’s trade.
The economy was paralyzed.

By the end of the 3rd century, any trade that was left was mostly local, using inefficient barter methods instead of any meaningful medium of exchange.

The Collapse

During the crisis of the 3rd century (235-284 A.D), there may have been more than 50 emperors. Most of these were murdered, assassinated, or killed in battle.

The empire was in a free-for-all, and it split into three separate states.

Constant civil wars meant the Empire’s borders were vulnerable. Trade networks were disintegrated and such activities became too dangerous.

Barbarian invasions came in from every direction. Plague was rampant.

And so the Western Roman Empire would cease to exist by 476 A.D.

zerohedge



7 Comments on "Currency And The Collapse Of The Roman Empire"

  1. makati1 on Fri, 19th Feb 2016 8:10 pm 

    “Administrative, logistical, and military costs kept adding up, and the Empire found creative new ways to pay for things. … Along with other factors, this led to hyperinflation, a fractured economy, localization of trade, heavy taxes, and a financial crisis that crippled Rome…”

    Does that sound familiar, America?

    The USD has lost 97+% of it’s purchasing power in the last century. Big numbers on your paycheck mean nothing if they cannot pay for the basics of life. My father supported a family on $40 per week in the 50s. Now it would take $40 per hour to provide the same lifestyle. It’s all relative.

    The Us has only the petrodollar propping it up and the rest of the world is chopping away at that Achilles heel. Almost everyday I read about a new country agreeing to trade in non-dollars. Eventually it will hit the tipping point and the Us house of cards will fall. I expect the world war to happen before then, to cover up the USD crash. We shall see. Either way, the Us is finished, just like Rome.

  2. In the middle on Fri, 19th Feb 2016 8:43 pm 

    It’s a different world now than it was in the time of Rome. The government can create stock in the US economy by the click of a mouse. It does not need or use precious metals for currency. As much as it’s a different world now in so many other ways as well, so is the possibility it will be a different result.

  3. Pennsyguy on Fri, 19th Feb 2016 10:24 pm 

    Currency may be part of the story, but I think that a society’s true wealth comes from high-quality and affordable physical resources. They may be slaves–an energy source–top soil, fresh water, metallic ores, rare earths, fossil fuels, etc.
    When they become less abundant, decline will ensue. It may take centuries, as with Rome, or it may happen faster. We are still in thrall to those pesky laws of physics.

  4. joe on Sat, 20th Feb 2016 7:42 am 

    Rome is THE example of how bad money replaces good. Europe is literally filled with buried treasue, and you just read why. Debased money circulates and good money is saved (buried), banks dont exist so you HAVE to bury it. If you build anything then the taxman will question your income.
    Banks as we know were the answer to the problem of safely storing gold, and Jews were considered neutral mainly because they had a small controlable population and didn’t mix with Christians. Of course now money is just a idea, a flick of a pen or the press of a button. But Rome is a great example of what happens when limits to growth are reached. When coin became so debased as to be useless, countries with tiny budgets and even roaming bands could challange a state directly on its border. Rome could afford to stand an impressive army for a battle but not a campaign. That’s why it allowed rampant immigration, just like Europe today. They hoped that the the hope of a better life would cause the new people to defend Rome, but it didn’t Rome debased its money, then it debased Classical Culture, and only when people conciously tried to revive it in Europe circa 17thC did Europe start to wake up from the dark age of middle eastern religion. The global renaissance began when people wanted to revive the greatness of ancient Rome, only this time they did it with banks and so limits to growth switched from liquidity issues to physical ones, like oil and population and cultural stability.

  5. ghung on Sat, 20th Feb 2016 8:23 am 

    Like all great civilizations, Rome went into overshoot relative to its resource base. Everything else was just complex artefacts of imperial overshoot.

  6. sidzepp on Sat, 20th Feb 2016 8:37 am 

    Government Debt + Population increase = eventual implosion. It will be quite interesting how the world is going to get out of the mess of 58+trillion dollars in debt. Then there is personal and corporate debt. Economists are the new priests.

  7. ghung on Sat, 20th Feb 2016 8:52 am 

    The global debt reckoning – Total global debt at $230 trillion. Total world debt over 300 percent annual GDP. There is no escape from a reckoning with debt markets.

    Even this figure excludes shadow banking debt, derivatives, CDS, and unfunded liabilities.

    Far too many claims…….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *