Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on April 5, 2017
Chomsky Repeats Assertion That Trump Could Stage Terror Attack
Liberal activist Noam Chomsky has doubled down on comments he made last month, saying he believes that President Trump may stage a terrorist attack in order to distract from unfulfilled promises and to bolster support.
Chomsky made the comments on Democracy Now, when asked to clarify his previous assertion that Trump may concoct a false flag attack and blame it on ‘vulnerable people’.
The author at first attempted to play down the comments saying that what he said wasn’t as inflammatory as some headlines suggested, but then he simply repeated the assertion that the President could literally stage a terrorist attack.
“Sooner or later this con game is not going to work,” said Chomsky, adding “People will understand he’s not bringing back jobs, he’s not going to recreate the partly illusory, partly real picture of what life was like in the past with manufacturing jobs, and a functioning society where you can get ahead and so on and so forth, he’s not going to create that.”
“What happens at that point? Something has to be done to maintain control,” Chomsky continued.
“The obvious technique is scapegoating. So, blame it on immigrants, on the Muslims, on somebody, but that can only go so far.” he exclaimed.
“The next step would be, as I said, an alleged terrorist attack, which is quite easy, in fact almost normal, like Condoleezza Rice’s ‘Mushroom Cloud,’” Chomsky continued, referring to the former National Security Adviser’s infamous fearmongering quote about Saddam Hussein potentially acquiring nuclear weapons in 2002.
“That’s easy to construct alleged attacks.” Chomsky continued.
The author then suggested Trump could go even further, employing the FBI to actually make a terror attack occur.
“The other possibility is a staged attack of a minor kind, and how hard would that be? Take the FBI technique, which they are using constantly, of creating situations of entrapment. Suppose one goes a little too far and you don’t stop it right in time.” Chomsky said.
“That wouldn’t be hard to work out. I don’t particularly anticipate it, but it is a possibility. And this is a very frightened country. for years, this has probably been the most terrified country in the world.” he added.
26 Comments on "Chomsky Repeats Assertion That Trump Could Stage Terror Attack"
Davy on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 8:21 am
I would call this guy a liberal shill but he is really living with early onset dementia and believes what he is saying. The deep state is the real danger for a false flag. We know who the deep state is and who they have coopted and the liberals are clearly part of that hijacking. We know the neocons are in with them. This dumbass is just more of the same failed strategy to dump Trump at ant cost. If the corrupt liberals were smart they would learn to use Trump against himself. Putin did this with Obama and the entire corrupt Democratic Party and this is why they focus on him so much. Putin kick their ass and now Trump is the legacy of that failure. Chomsky, bend over and take it you pussy.
eugene on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 8:36 am
I always enjoy it when some one who knows little writes/says derogatory and, actually, rude, remarks based on his opinion. Chomsky is widely recognized as knowledgeable. You seem to “know” a whole lot. If one knows US history or the history of any empire, governments are perfectly capable of staging attacks to maneuver the masses. In my opinion, all governments have a “deep” state Powerful people are always in the shadows. Powerful people have plans. Trump is just an unstable narcissistic sociopath who cares nothing about anyone except himself. There isn’t a plan. There’s just chaos.
Cloggie on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 8:48 am
Noam Chomsky was the guy who said that as far as he was concerned he couldn’t care too much about who was behind 9/11.
He really said that. And it is not difficult to figure out why he is not interested in 9/11 truth coming out, just like was the case with Great Thinker and fellow tribesman Howard Zinn. Because they both know damn well who did it, if not these “19 Arabs with boxcutters” and they would love to keep that under the lid (9/11 = Mossad + CIA, designed to “redecorate” the ME and advance a “New American Century”)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93qmlKH_d8c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d55Wzme0UcQ
So here you have it, Chomsky is well-versed with intelligence agencies carrying out false flag operations.
Chomsky is hardcore US deep state. Chomsky is fighting Trump tooth and nail. Wonder what Chomsky and his buddies at the Mossad are up to. Because you can bet your bottom dollar that they won’t allow Trump to hijack America from Soros-Chomsky & co without a fight.
dissident on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 8:57 am
The current rinse and repeat chemical attack in Syria is proof that Chomsky is a member of Killary’s cult. Trump obviously has no control over the US government which proceeds to act at the UN as if Obama was still in control.
In case some of you saps swallow the Assad did it lie, how come the dead children have obvious bludgeoning injuries on their heads and necks? These are clearly not caustic gas injuries and sarin is not like mustard gas.
If US elements stage a terrorist act, it will not be those associated with Trump, but with Chomsky’s beloved Killary.
You Don't Want to Know Me on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 9:28 am
As is usual around the internet comment threads work best to prove how massively stupid people are.
Mom said it best, better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you’re stupid than open it and say something and prove you’re stupid.
Ya’ll ought to take that advice.
Cloggie on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 9:28 am
In case some of you saps swallow the Assad did it lie
I at least don’t. Yesterday night on the Dutch news… reports from the (UK-based) “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights”, that’s a club that backs the “Rebels” and is anti-Assad. It is a similar fake news “independent club in the blogosphere”, like Bellingcat, always frequented by the Western MSM, in reality NATO asset.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Observatory_for_Human_Rights
The organisation is run by Rami Abdulrahman (sometimes referred to as Rami Abdul Rahman), from his home in Coventry. He is a Syrian Sunni Muslim who owns a clothes shop. Born Osama Suleiman, he adopted a pseudonym during his years of activism in Syria, and has used it publicly ever since. After being imprisoned three times in Syria, Abdulrahman fled to the United Kingdom fearing a fourth jail term and has not returned.
Tellingly nobody had visible injuries from the “chemical attack”.
http://russia-insider.com/en/erdogan-tells-putin/ri19443
Whooptido, major league humanitarian Erdogan stands up for the victims of Assad. Has absolutely nothing to do with geopolitical interests.ROFL
The whole story stinks.
@dissident – are you from Russia? Davy probably knows.
Cloggie on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 9:44 am
Now I actually watched the video. He didn’t get specific, but it could very well have been that he hinted at the Left’s favorite “false flag”, the Reichstag fire in Berlin of early 1933:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire
The German government used the occasion to further restrict civil liberties. The standard story of the global Left is that the Natzis put the building on fire for exactly this purpose.
The truth is that there can be no doubt that the Dutch commie Marinus van der Lubbe actually was behind the arson attack.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marinus_van_der_Lubbe
Van der Lubbe said that he set the Reichstag building on fire as a cry to rally the German workers against fascist rule… After World War II, moves by Marinus van der Lubbe’s brother, Jan van der Lubbe were made in an attempt to overturn the verdict against his brother. In 1967, his sentence was changed by a judge from death to eight years in prison. In 1980, after more lengthy complaints, a West German court overturned the verdict entirely but this was protested by the state prosecutor. The case was re-examined by the Federal Court of Justice of Germany for three years until, in 1983, the court made a final decision on the matter, overturning the result of the earlier 1980 trial on grounds that there was no basis for it, making it therefore illegal. However, on December 6, 2007, the Attorney General of Germany Monika Harms nullified the entire verdict and posthumously pardoned Van der Lubbe based on a 1998 German law that makes it possible to overturn certain cases of Nazi injustice. The determination of the court was based on the premise that the National Socialist regime was by definition unjust; and, since the death sentence in this case was politically motivated, it was likely to have contained an extension of that injustice. The finding was independent of the factual question of whether or not it was Van der Lubbe who actually set the fire.
Even postwar judges declined to acquit van der Lubbe of actually doing it.
deadlykillerbeaz on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 9:58 am
Chomsky is manufacturing consent. Too old to be part of the picture these days, out to pasture. Noam was interviewed by the CBC in Canada many years ago. He rightly pointed out the hypocrisy of Canadian citizens who criticized the US involvement in Vietnam while all the while profiting by supplying the US war machine. Canadians didn’t like what Noam said on the Canadian radio waves.
Everybody has all kinds of faults.
Trump has many faults, easy to find those faults when you look for them.
Doesn’t matter who the president is, they all have faults, they’re human, just like the rest of us. The nature of the beast is to remain alive and well.
Every single soul on the planet has to survive, to do that, you have to eat, to do that, work is required.
Obama isn’t a bad person, imo. Some people don’t like him, they can find many faults, a confirmation bias.
Some people do not like Trump. In the middle of the intersection K and 14th streets in Washington DC two words were in white paint on the black asphalt of the intersection, they said ‘Fuck Trump’. I know, because I saw the words myself.
Try not to be so judgemental when you have something to say.
I doubt that Trump really wants to hurt anybody.
The world is at war now, nobody wants to know about it or hear about it, really, denial offers more comfort.
A false flag is redundant at this point in time. A false flag to make it look like Donald Trump is the culprit is what can be expected.
Trump is better off flying to Chile and live in exile. It will do him a lot of good.
There is no fixing and no saving what was once America.
Forget about this deep state bullshit in the gov and how it carries and conducts itself.
Might as well, it ain’t gonna change. The skullduggery never stops.
Davy on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:07 am
Eugene, no different from you just honest about my extremism. If you quit I will quit otherwise I enjoy seeing your type squirm. You are so politically correct incorrect.
Davy on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:11 am
We don’t know you and why should we because you don’t ever say anything. We could give a shit about your dumbass momma, pussy.
Cloggie on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:25 am
Trump is better off flying to Chile and live in exile. It will do him a lot of good.
Some people live to end up in the history books, others just to eat and sh*t and go on holiday to Chile.
That’s the difference between Trump and you.
joe on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:33 am
They are capable of anything. From the ignored early warnings before Pearl Harbour, the Gulf of Tonkin, bay of Pigs, need I go on? The fake terrorist attacks staged along the Polish border used to justify the German invasion. The latest chemical attack on a hospital in idlib was staged to make Assad look bad. He is winning, he doesnt need to act desperate. Isis is collapsing in Deir Ezzor, Raqqa next, Aleppo province almost 100% cleared of terrorists. Idlib could wait. Imho, this was staged to try and force the world to send in ‘peace keepers’, so that the evil jihadis that cant make it past Turkeys new border wall there can keep their heads on their bodies and never be tried in fair courts.
efarmer on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:45 am
Overanalyzation of a pure bullshit artist leads to extremely complicated theories and conspiracies that are unwarranted and needlessly complex. I think they are all trying to figure out how to make a living or keep a literary following by alluding to deep trends in a very shallow and self serving subject.
To me it is like a Freudian analysis of Popeye, with a 600 page addendum for each of the Olive Oils.
joe on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:48 am
Since when is simple logic over-analysis?
joe on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:51 am
Chomsky is a smart guy, he tells thing how he sees it, in this case I think hes wrong, because the deep state is out to get rid of Trump, that alone is reason to love Trump!
You Don't Want to Know Me on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 10:51 am
“We could give a shit about your dumbass momma, pussy.”
Keep proving me right you dumb ass, pig shit eating, mother fucking, fat ass, low life, loser. I fuck your mother every night.
See, I can toss stupid insults too fuck face.
Keep opening your mouth hole and spewing – every time you do you prove me right.
Now say something else before you run back upstairs from your basement and suck your momma’s tit.
efarmer on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 11:14 am
Okay, I’m totally sold, I don’t want to know you. You win.
You Don't Want to Know Me on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 11:19 am
Nobody wants to know me efarmer… glad you figured it out.
Cloggie on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 11:28 am
Major loss for Trump: Bannon out.
https://www.infowars.com/live-now-steve-bannon-out/
Anonymouse on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 1:04 pm
Not sure what infojewz are so upset about. The so-called ‘obama regime’, engineered numerous false flags during its time, or at the very least, tried to amplify any incident or occurrence, no matter how insignificant, into major international incidents if felt they could be used to advance the uS hegemony in some way. In fact, false flags are a key FEATURE of uSgov policy, no matter what the regime in washingdum in called.
trump is not smart enough, nor does he have enough support( or any support really) amoung the deep-state\ military\intel groups to carry out such a thing even if he wanted to. Despite the uS having a long and storied history of using false flags, the uS deep state and its servants, dont often blow the whistle on such ops. They certainly would never stage one solely to benefit ‘president’ trump. Quite the opposite if anything. I can see the deep state arranging one to make him look ‘weak’, now that is entirely plausible.
So, if the trumpster ever entertained the notion, even for an instant, the deep state would expose him in a heartbeat. He would be handing them the means to depose him instantly. Wait, doesn’t that mean no false flags under trump? Of course not! False flag ops are on-going in the uS, regardless of who sit on the ceremonial WH throne. It only means the chances of one emanating from trump himself, are virtually nil.
trump is free continue to offend almost anyone he wants, and so long the official rage is directed at all the traditional’ targets of PNAC and friends, you know, Iran, North Korea, Russia and so on, he’ll be left more or less alone. Except by hollywood and the curiously mislabeled ‘liberal press’ in the uS of course.
DerHundistlos on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 2:50 pm
@ I DO Want to know you
Funny comments. Thanks.
@ Whatever is a efarmer
Joe is correct. Only a fool ignores the lessons of history. False flags are tried and proven diversionary tactics.
joe on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 5:08 pm
Yeah, drain the swamp. Deep state wins, the marshmallow is squeeling in pain now ‘please CIA, I’ll be good, just give me a wall’. The whole
USA is just another bullshit Trump university deal now. Wonder if theyll ever find that leaker now….
Theedrich on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 6:34 pm
A false-flag attack is unneeded. Sorry, Chomsky. A few weeks ago, U.S. bombers killed about 200+ civilian Syrians. Whoops! Mistake, mistake. Nothing to see here, folks. Just move on.
Then a few days ago, some kind of a gas attack killed about 100 civilian Syrians. Even though the provenance of the attack was unknown, it was immediately blamed on the Syrian government. No, it could not possibly have been a “false-flag” attack engineered by ISIS, because that would not have fit the CIA’s narrative. It MUST have been due to Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president — and to the Russians, who of course (as we are assured by the Yid media) handed the American presidential election to Donald Trump, criminally defeating the glorious and meritorious “it’s her turn” Hillary Clinton.
So now President Trump is in a bind; if he sends in troops to attack Assad, he will be said to be risking war with the Russians; if he does nothing, he will be decried as a weakling who should abdicate the throne. It all fits together so nicely.
Anonymouse on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 7:51 pm
Exactly. the last time the ISISraeli’s tried this in 2013, it didnt work. That was because even ‘president’ obomber knew they couldnt make that turd stick.
Now there is a ‘new president’, and the mossadi jihadis are trying to run the same op with trumpf. I guess the hope is, the far more impulsive trump will give the go-ahead for a full-blown uS invasion, (unlike the more modest, covert invasion that is going on atm). Of course, the dark state has given trumpy plenty of reasons to say ‘yes’ to such aggression, and very little reason to say no. Trump needs to curry favor with his numerous enemies (which is like, everyone lol), and he could also use a distraction from the endless petty heckling he gets from the Jewnited Snakes media. Nor would hurt any that he cant actually deliver on any of his vague promises to the ‘base’. Wars are often helpful in that regard, at least for a while.
The figurehead obomber, to his limited credit, was smart enough to know when he overplayed his hand and was beaten, (in 2013 by President Putin). After that, he didn’t have much choice but to tell his guys to pick a more covert route to get their pipeline corridors.
Trump of course, is neither smart enough to know when hes been beaten, or even able to tell when hes being set up. That could create a lot of problems for a lot of people if trump takes the bait over this supposed ‘gas attack 2.0 media op’. I guess well see. Since the uS is directly implicating Russia in this alleged attack, its pretty clear the neo-zions are not terribly worried about the possibly of engaging Russia directly over this ginned up ‘gas’attack’. They should be of course, but that does not appear to be the case does it?
________________________________________ on Wed, 5th Apr 2017 8:04 pm
The more evil and deranged you are the longer you live. Even these fags don’t get aids and die. Maybe it’s all the baby blood they get in their transfusions. This realm is either engineered and/or ruled by satan
Graham Whatley on Fri, 7th Apr 2017 11:17 pm
Chomsky a liberal? Thats hilarious. Anarchist not liberal.