Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on December 16, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Big Oil And The Traditionalist International

Big Oil And The Traditionalist International thumbnail

During the US election campaign I occasionally wondered if a Trump administration might occasionally do some oddball things that had positive outcomes. Even after the election he made time to meet with Al Gore and Leonardo Di Caprio to talk about global warming, which could have been seen as a sign there could be some hope of some forward looking policies on clean energy.

As his cabinet appointments have been announced though, it has become clear that a Trump administration is going to be dominated by fossil fuel interests even more heavily than the Bush / Cheney regime was, with the announcement of Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State showing that US foreign policy will remain single-mindedly focused on oil for the foreseeable future.

Exxon has been looking to expand its presence in Russia for some time and Vladimir Putin awarded Tillerson the Russian “Order of Friendship” in 2013 after they negotiated a deal trading access to oil fields in the Russian Arctic for Exxon in exchange for Russian access to oilfields in Texas.

Joe Romm thinks that the Trump-Putin petrostate axis is going to focus on destroying international action on global warming, noting “the aligning interests between Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russia’s choice for U.S. president (Donald Trump), and Big Oil represents the gravest threat to humanity (and democracy) since the rise of the Axis powers in the 1930s. That’s because while Trump may not be able to destroy global climate action and the landmark 2015 Paris climate deal all by himself — as he pledged to do during the campaign — he probably could do that with help from Russia and the trillion-dollar oil industry.”

The grassroots backing for this new axis of evil is coming from what is being dubbed in some quarters as the “Traditionalist International“, a 21st century reversal of the old communist international concept – with Moscow looking to promote extreme nationalism along with a return to feudal social structures and other “traditional” practices like fossil fuel based transportation and power generation.

The Economist has a good summary of this Russian push to retard progress in the West via the “alt right” in the United States and far right wing groups in Europe and elsewhere – Russian propaganda is state-of-the-art again.

From the Mediterranean to the Pacific, Mr Putin is hailed as an example by nationalists, populists and dictators. “My favourite hero is Putin,” said Rodrigo Duterte, the brutal president of the Philippines. Mr Trump called Mr Putin “a leader far more than our president.” In Italy Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement took Mr Putin’s side against the West, and the anti-immigrant Northern League, led by Matteo Salvini, has enthused about his Russia. “No clandestine immigrants, no squeegee merchants and no Roma encampments [in Moscow],” tweeted Mr Salvini during a visit in 2014.In France Marine Le Pen, whose National Front received a loan from a Russian bank, attacks the European Union and America for being too aggressive towards Russia. In the words of Dimitar Bechev, the author of a forthcoming book on Russia in the Balkans, “Putin enjoys a cult status with all holding a grudge against the West.” Nowhere is that status greater than with the nationalists of America’s “alt-right”. Matthew Heimbach, the founder of the Traditionalist Worker Party and a crusader against “anti-Christian degeneracy”, told the New York Times he sees Mr Putin as “the leader of the free world.” He called for the creation of a “Traditionalist International”—a reference to the Communist International founded in 1919.

The last time Russia had such a role in crystallising anti-establishment ideas was in the 1920s and 1930s, after the Bolshevik revolution. When Stalin wrote that the Soviet Union had become an “open centre of the world revolutionary movement”, it was not just propaganda. …

Today, 25 years after the Soviet collapse, Russia is again seen as an emblem—this time of a nationalist imperial order. And just as in the 1930s, its isolationism does not prevent it from being involved in the global populist, anti-establishment trend. The Kremlin’s bet on marginal right-wing parties has paid off as they have moved into the mainstream. It has pumped out disinformation and propaganda both through its official media channels, such as the RT and Sputnik news networks, and through thousands of paid internet trolls. Its cyber-attacks against Western countries produced troves of emails and documents which it dumped into the hands of foreign media, disrupting America’s presidential elections to the benefit of Mr Trump. …

Unlike the Socialists of the 1930s, the Kremlin and its friends today are driven not so much by ideology as by opportunism (and, in Russia’s case, corruption). Mr Putin’s primary goal is not to present an alternative political model but to undermine Western democracies whose models present an existential threat to his rule at home. Having lived through the Soviet collapse, he is well aware that the attraction of the prosperous, value-based West helped defeat communism. The retreat of that liberal democratic idea allows Russian propagandists to claim a victory.

peak energy

9 Comments on "Big Oil And The Traditionalist International"

  1. Apneaman on Fri, 16th Dec 2016 1:19 pm 

    Fracking Can Contaminate Drinking Water, Has Made Some Water Supplies “Unusable,” Long-Awaited EPA Study Concludes

  2. Anonymous on Fri, 16th Dec 2016 5:28 pm 

    More exceptionalist tripe. Aka ‘propaganda’. Total waste of electrons…

  3. Newfie on Fri, 16th Dec 2016 8:14 pm 

    There is no shortage of electrons…

  4. dissident on Sat, 17th Dec 2016 8:28 am 

    The Economist is a Russophobic rag that engages in endless hate fantasy projection on Russia. Citing it is a total joke. The NATO mass media loves generating false narratives and hysteria to advance NATO’s imperial agenda.

    Russia controls most of the oil and gas resources of the Arctic Ocean due to geology: the shallow sedimentary shelf is primarily in Russia’s EEZ, the sedimentary shelves off Canada and the US and even Scandinavia are limited and most of the Arctic Ocean basin is metamorphic rock without any hydrocarbon deposits. But if you believe the NATO agitprop Russia is “trying to grab” these resources. No, it is NATO that is trying to grab Russia’s resources and will use any pretext and lie to attempt it.

    Trump’s sin is for actually planning to engage in normal business relations with Russia instead of imperial aggression. The NATO mass media, the mouthpiece of NATO elites, will have none of that.

  5. Cloggie on Sat, 17th Dec 2016 8:40 am 

    The Economist (1843) once represent the heart of the British Empire, liberalism.

    Today it represents the heart of the NWO (US Empire), that is as it was pre-November 2016.

    Currently the Economist is in an identity crisis from which she unlikely will recover as this is not going to be a third liberal century.

    The Economist hates Russia for its will for independence rather than submit itself to the US Sanhedrin.

    It is no longer important what the Economist has to say.

  6. geopressure on Sat, 17th Dec 2016 8:47 am 

    We took away all of Russia’s Vast Caspian Oil Resources in the 1990’s to defund the Russian Government after the first cold war… Now we want to take away their Arctic Oil too, but it’s not gonna work this time…

  7. JuanP on Sat, 17th Dec 2016 10:49 am 

    If the Russians were smart they would turn their backs on the USA and stop doing business with US citizens forever. Unfortunately, the average Russian is only slightly smarter than the average human animal. Relocalization is the name of the game now. Globalization is a thing of the past. The Russians should stop trading with foreign countries and save their resources for themselves. But Russians are humans and humans are stupid, ignorant, selfish and ambitious animals so they won’t do it.

  8. Cloggie on Sat, 17th Dec 2016 10:58 am 

    If the Russians were smart they would turn their backs on the USA and stop doing business with US citizens forever.

    Russians or their current leadership rather, are a little smarter than you would give them credit for. Breaking with the US one month after the electoral victory of a candidate who says that he wants to mends relations with Russia would be definitely not a very smart thing to do. Russia would be well advised to be open for a cautious rapprochement with the US, a process that could well take a year.

  9. Sissyfuss on Sat, 17th Dec 2016 12:56 pm 

    Gotta agree with you on that point, Cloggo. And man is it killing me to do so!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *