Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 27, 2013

Bookmark and Share

US shale boom starts to fade

US shale boom starts to fade thumbnail

The SMH has an article opining that prospects for US shale oil production are fading – US shale boom starts to fade.

For the past three years, the boom in the US shale oil industry has outstripped all expectations. Production surged far faster than any forecasts; drillers raced to secure space in new pipelines to get their crude to market. Now, at the periphery, that may be changing – at least for a while.News from two of the country’s less developed shale plays in Colorado and Ohio last week offer a reality check for the wave of euphoria that has washed across the industry. The stumbles mark a break from the past few years, when nearly every new project was an overnight success and output grew and grew.

On Thursday, Ohio, home to the Utica shale, finally released annual data on 2012 production that showed the state pumped less than 700,000 barrels of oil from its shale wells — barely enough to fill a small oil tanker. North Dakota’s Bakken shale pumps more than that every day. Even state officials said it the result was “lower than initially estimated.”

The day before, NuStar Energy LP had said it would shelve a plan to reverse a pair of underused refined products pipelines to ship crude from Colorado’s Niobrara shale oil play to Texas. It failed, twice, to garner enough commitments from potential customers to justify investing in the conversion. Neither development was a surprise to industry experts, and both were likely affected by extenuating circumstances.

A growing preference for rail shipments likely dimmed interest in long-term commitments to use NuStar’s pipeline. Ohio’s shale may yet offer up large volumes of liquid gas and condensate, if drillers can find new ways to coax it out.

Yet taken together they offered a sign that the flush of enthusiasm and rush of investment that piled into shale fields from one coast to the other has hit a curve. While the basic technologies of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling was enough to coax an unexpected gusher of oil from shale rock in many regions, these more challenging seams may require incremental innovation to unlock.

Platts has an article boosting the prospects for the shale industry finding more plays like the Eagle Ford in Texas – Did the shale revolution already find its biggest oil field at the Eagle Ford?.

In case you didn’t catch it, investment house Credit Suisse had a wonderfully informative conference call for their clients last week on how they see the future of the shale revolution that has engulfed the oil patch in the last decade and become hyper-active especially in the last several years.Among the bank’s conclusions: shale is a vital component of current US production which is growing at a huge clip — CS sees as much as 10 million b/d of US oil production in the next several years, up from 6.5 million b/d last year. CS also noted consistently improving well results from big plays such as the Permian Basin in West Texas and Bakken Shale in North Dakota.

Moreover, it’s not only the upstream that is exploding, but also companies that supply the technologies to eke out more oil in less time. Even ancillary services are exploding, such as technologies that can treat and dispose of water — a crucial component of well fracturing. And all this will require many billions of investment dollars into a shale economy still years away from the mature development stage.

But one other thing Credit Suisse said, which echoes the sentiments of many in the industry, was that it was “skeptical” a new large field on the order of the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas would happen. The Eagle Ford is one of the most prolific shale fields which boasts an estimated 943,000 b/d of liquids production and is forecast to produce 1.6 million b/d by late 2018. Instead, Credit Suisse said existing areas with “stacked” pay targets — i.e., layered formations –are better bets right now. When you consider how far industry has come in the last five years alone, it seems almost reactionary to make such a statement. And Credit Suisse is far from alone in that view: many executives share it — even from top shale producers.

Five years ago, the Eagle Ford Shale hadn’t even been discovered, at least not officially. Although a few companies were out there quietly working the field, it was Petrohawk Energy that announced a gas find there in October, 2008. By that time, other shale fields had already been discovered — the Haynesville in Louisiana, a gas field; the Bakken oil field in North Dakota; and of course, the granddaddy of them all, the Barnett in North Texas which sparked the widespread move by operators to shale exploitation in the early 2000s, although the field’s first wells were drilled in the early 1980s.

The Oil Drum has a skeptical look at the endless treadmill of drilling that shale oil / gas extraction requires- Is the Typical NDIC Bakken Tight Oil Well a Sales Pitch?.

In this post I present the results from dynamic simulations using the typical tight oil well for the Bakken as recently presented by the North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC), together with the “2011 average” well as defined from actual production data from around 240 wells that were reported to have started producing from June through December 2011.The use of the phrase “Typical Bakken Well” by NDIC as shown in Figure 01 is here believed to depict what is to be expected from the average tight oil well.

The results from the dynamic simulations show:

If the “Typical Bakken Well” is what NDIC recently has presented, total production from Bakken (the portion that lies in North Dakota) should have been around 1.1 Mb/d in February 2013.
Reported production from Bakken by NDIC as of February 2013 was 0.7 Mb/d.
Actual production data shows that the first year’s production for the average well in Bakken (North Dakota) presently is around 55% of the “Typical Bakken Well” presented by NDIC.
The results from the simulations anticipate a slowdown for the annual growth in oil production from Bakken (ND) through 2013 and 2014.

The production developments in Bakken and other tight oil plays are very much a function of monthly additions of producing wells, developments in well productivity, decline rates (for the growing population of “older” producing wells), development in costs, strategies deployed by the companies for development of their acreage, adequate infrastructure and not least the developments/expectations for the oil price.

 

 

peak energy


9 Comments on "US shale boom starts to fade"

  1. rollin on Mon, 27th May 2013 12:15 pm 

    The Bakken and other tight oil fields depend on constant new drilling and refracking to maintain oil flow. The Bakken will soon need 2000 new wells per year to keep up. As can be seen from the graph, the typical slow down in drilling during the winter produced a rapid drop in production.
    This is the true treadmill of oil operations.
    The big question is what is next?

  2. BillT on Mon, 27th May 2013 2:00 pm 

    rollin, collapse is next. Soon, I think.

  3. Kenz300 on Mon, 27th May 2013 2:45 pm 

    Just another reason to switch to alternative energy sources. They are safer, cleaner and cheaper.

    Quote — ” Renewables are becoming too competitive for fossil fuels.

    Forbes has quoted Rick Needham, director of energy and sustainability at Google saying, “While fossil-based prices are on a cost curve that goes up, renewable prices are on this march downward.” That pretty much sums it up. In just the last five years, solar photovoltaic module prices have fallen 80 percent and wind turbines have become 29 percent less expensive. Moreover, after the initial investment, renewables such as wind and solar, having no cost of fuel, will prove far too competitive for fossil fuels no matter how cheap those may appear to be. Cheap fuel is still more than free fuel.”

    ———————-

    STORY: The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels

    http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/05/the-economic-case-for-divesting-from-fossil-fuels?page=2

  4. GregT on Mon, 27th May 2013 3:00 pm 

    “The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.”

    Albert Bartlett

  5. shortonoil on Mon, 27th May 2013 3:23 pm 

    “The Eagle Ford is one of the most prolific shale fields which boasts an estimated 943,000 b/d of liquids production and is forecast to produce 1.6 million b/d by late 2018.”

    According to EOG, who is the largest producer in the Eagle Ford, 70% of this quoted 943,000 b/d is condensate, not crude. Condensate is a rather poor cousin to conventional crude, and one would think that a bunch of bankers who are handling $billions of other peoples money would know this!

    When a banker’s bonus depends on how many sub-prime mortgages they can push, how many Greek bonds they can sell, or how many acres of snake oil they can pawn off on pension funds, they aren’t going to let a little thing like facts get in the way!

    Beware the hype!

  6. Ham on Tue, 28th May 2013 12:18 am 

    For this they are industrialising the countryside. The idea that they can export huge quantities to raise the price of it is pie in the sky. It is going to end in tears.

  7. Plantagenet on Tue, 28th May 2013 3:39 am 

    Drilling and fracking 2000 wells a year produces a lot of high paying jobs. The unemployment rate in No. Dakota is about 2%—-the best anywhere in the USA.

    We don’t need less fracking in the USA—we need MORE fracking because we need MORE jobs.

  8. BillT on Tue, 28th May 2013 4:18 am 

    Planet, we need 5-10 million more good paying jobs, but they will not come from hydrocarbon scrapings. A few hundred that do noting but destroy what is left of America is NOT the answer. Close down ALL fraking now!

  9. GregT on Tue, 28th May 2013 9:38 pm 

    The sad truth of the matter is, we need about 6 billion less people, with less money, and less of an appetite for unnecessary consumer crap.

    The longer we keep this stupidity going, the greater the hardship and loss of life that will result. If we wait for too long, there will be nothing left for anyone.

    Our biggest hurdle to overcome will be food production, there will be more than enough jobs to go around just trying to keep us all fed. Maybe now would be a good time to re-learn how to farm locally. While we still have the opportunity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *