Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on March 23, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Oil search in Arctic is safe claims Statoil

Ice, extreme temperatures and a vulnerable environment are all surmountable challenges as drillers set out to hunt for oil in a new area of Norway’s Arctic Barents Sea, according to Statoil and other explorers.

Studies by Statoil and 15 other companies such as Shell show there have been only a “few days” of sea ice in the northernmost blocks since 2003, and south of that even less, said Aashild Tandberg Skjaerseth, chair of the Barents Sea Exploration Collaboration, a venture set up by the companies.

It’s also unlikely that any spill would reach the polar ice cap as oil and sea ice tend to drift in the same direction, she said.

“Our main conclusion is that there is no health, environmental or safety challenge that is so significant that it can’t be appropriately mitigated,” Skjaerseth said.

The findings were handed over to authorities this week and will be distributed soon by the Norwegian Oil & Gas Association, a lobby group.

Norway is opening more of the Barents Sea off its northern tip to oil explorers as it seeks to boost national crude production that’s dropped by half since 2000.

The government plans to award licenses before the summer in the Barents Sea Southeast, an area disputed by Russia until a 2010 border agreement, which includes the northernmost blocks ever offered by Norway.

It’s attracted interest from international explorers just as other parts of the Arctic, such as Alaska and Greenland, are relinquished amid a collapse in oil prices.

The extent of Norway’s 23rd licensing round has been criticized by environmental groups and opposition parties in parliament, who say some of the blocks are too close to the edge of the polar ice sheet, an area with a fragile ecosystem sustaining species from polar bears to sea mammals, fish and birds.

There’s little that’s new in the report by Statoil and its partners, Greenpeace said Tuesday.

“This is what the oil industry has been saying the whole time, as they constantly play down the environmental and operational challenges that we know exist in the northern areas,” Truls Gulowsen, the organization’s head of Norway operations, said by phone. “Any fishing boat operating in these areas knows it’s demanding.”

Yet with almost half of Norway’s undiscovered oil and gas resources, according to government estimates, the Barents Sea is an area of increasing interest to energy companies suffering reserve depletion in the North Sea and elsewhere.

Operating conditions there, including in the new area, are no different from the North Sea in terms of wind, waves and currents, according to Skjaerseth, who’s also the leader for safety and sustainability in Statoil’s Exploration Norway & U.K. unit.

The biggest difference is the temperature, which can fall to minus 32 degrees Celsius (minus 26 Fahrenheit), she said.

Studies show a more than 40% concentration of sea ice occurred in the northernmost blocks in 25 of the 46 years through 2012, according to the reports.

Still, the speed of the ice’s approach would leave ample time to disconnect an oil rig, Skjaerseth said.

When it comes to icebergs, the risk they’d come within 100 meters (330 feet) of a rig is once in every 2,000 years in the most northern blocks, she said.

Greenpeace’s Gulowsen said climate change had made conditions in the Barents Sea more unpredictable.

“There can be winters with significant amounts of ice,” he said. “The fact that few icebergs have been observed over the past years is no guarantee that we won’t get any in the future.”

Only one oil field — Eni SpA’s Goliat deposit — and one natural-gas field — Statoil’s Snoehvit — have been put in production in the Barents Sea.

The government has received applications from 26 companies in the 23rd licensing round.

energy voice



9 Comments on "Oil search in Arctic is safe claims Statoil"

  1. rockman on Wed, 23rd Mar 2016 12:17 pm 

    “Our main conclusion is that there is no health, environmental or safety challenge that is so significant that it can’t be appropriately mitigated,” Skjaerseth said.” Or as the engineer at Macondo said after his concerns about the cement test were dismissed: “I guess that’s why we have blowout preventers.” Every well the rockman has worked on there were no significant problems…until there were. LOL.

  2. eugene on Wed, 23rd Mar 2016 12:32 pm 

    Rest easy, there’s absolutely nothing we cannot do. We are all things and have become god. There are not limits. What BS.

  3. peakyeast on Wed, 23rd Mar 2016 12:36 pm 

    The keyword “appropriately”.

    I think that the definition of that varies greatly between different parties on this subject.

  4. Plantagenet on Wed, 23rd Mar 2016 12:52 pm 

    The Norweigians are going to develop their resources in the Arctic If anybody can work safely there it will be the Norweigians

  5. PracticalMaina on Wed, 23rd Mar 2016 2:00 pm 

    Those Norwegians do have a lot of money to waste, they should do it in a more responsible way.

  6. rockman on Wed, 23rd Mar 2016 2:02 pm 

    Plant – Are you aware that when the Norwigians studied the safety records they found that in the MAJORITY of well control situations the BOP’s malfunctioned?

    here’s a wee taste: West Vanguard Blowout

    According to Norwegian Petroleum Directorate records, Statoil’s well 6407/6-2 was spudded by the Smedvig West Vanguard on 04 October 1985. The 36″ top hole had been drilled down to 323m MDBRT with the 30″ conductor set at 318m MDBRT. The blow-out preventer (BOP) had not yet been installed.

    At around 2050 hours on the night of 06 October 1985 while drilling the upper Pliocene sediments of the 26″ section, a drilling break was observed between 505-508m MDBRT with an ROP increase from 40m/hr to 712m/hr. Drilling was stopped at 523m MDBRT and the bit was pulled back 15m, after which the well began flowing and unsuccessful attempts were made to kill the well by pumping kill mud. The bit had entered a shallow gas pocket at around 504m causing the well to blow out. A MAYDAY was sent from the rig at about 2310 and picked up by the Norwegian rescue center at Sola, which directed rescue ships and helicopters to the crew’s aid.

    With no BOP used for the top hole section, the flow of gas had been directed through the diverter system. This system was unable to contain the flow and the liberated gas exploded at around 2320 hours, engulfing the rig in a fireball. The one fatality is assumed to have resulted from this explosion, although reports indicate the victim’s remains were never found. The rest of the crew were able to evacuate the rig in a matter of minutes using the fore lifeboats. The rig’s deck structure, two of its legs and the engine room were damaged in the blast, resulting in the rig listing by 10 degrees.

    By the following day, the fire had burnt out but gas continued to leak out of the well and bubble up to the side of the listing, fire-damaged hulk. Reporters flying over the rig noted a large hole in one of the rig’s legs, extensive fire damage and a fallen crane.

  7. makati1 on Wed, 23rd Mar 2016 6:56 pm 

    More fluff and bullshit from the oily crowd. Pretending that BAU is just having a slight fever. Not that it is dying of an incurable cancer. Someone pull the plug please!

  8. rockman on Thu, 24th Mar 2016 5:17 am 

    mak – hey, watch it buddy…I’m one of that oily crowd. LOL

  9. makati1 on Thu, 24th Mar 2016 7:59 am 

    Sometimes we are guilty by association, not fact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *