Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on February 16, 2017

Bookmark and Share

Is The Bakken a Bust?

Is The Bakken a Bust? thumbnail

North Dakota has released December production data for the Bakken and for all North Dakota. They were a little shocking.

Bakken & North Dakota

Bakken production down 86,150 barrels per day 895,330 bpd. North Dakota production down 92,029 bpd to 942,455 bpd. It was noted that this the largest decline ever in North Dakota production. But it should not be overlooked that the October in crease in production was also the largest ever increase in North Dakota production.

From the Director’s Cut

 Oil Production

November    31,034,520 barrels = 1,034,484 barrels/day
December    29,216,093 barrels =   942,455 barrels/day (preliminary)
(all-time high was Dec 2014 at 1,227,483 barrels/day

 Gas Production

November    52,785,707 MCF = 1,759,524 MCF/day
December    47,679,872 MCF = 1,538,060 MCF/day (preliminary)
(all-time high was Nov 2016 at 1,759,524 MCF/day)

Producing Wells

November    13,520
December    13,337 (preliminary)
(all-time high was Nov 2016 at 13,520)
11,449 wells or 86% are now unconventional Bakken – Three forks wells
1,888 wells or 14% produce from legacy conventional pools

 Permitting

November    76 drilling and 2 seismic
December    35 drilling and 0 seismic
January     81 drilling and 1 seismic (all time high was 370 in 10/2012)

ND Sweet Crude Price

November    $34.58/barrel
December    $39.93/barrel
January     $40.75/barrel
Today       $42.50/barrel (all-time high was $136.29 7/3/2008)

Rig Count

November    37
December    40
January     38
Today’s rig count is 38 (all-time high was 218 on 5/29/2012)

Comments:

The drilling rig count increased three from November to December, then decreased two from December to January, and is currently unchanged from January to today.  Operators are shifting from running the minimum number of rigs to incremental increases throughout 2017, as long as oil prices remain between $50/barrel and $60/barrel WTI.

The number of well completions decreased slightly from 84(final) in November to 81(preliminary) in December.

Oil price weakness is anticipated to last into the second quarter of 2017.

There were three significant precipitation events, fifteen days with wind speeds in excess of 35 mph (too high for completion work), and nine days with temperatures below -10F. January 2017 will be more of the same.

Over 98% of drilling now targets the Bakken and Three Forks formations.Estimated wells waiting on completion2 is 807, down 32 from the end of November to the end of December. Estimated inactive well count3 is 1,573, up 54 from the end of November to the end of December.

Crude oil take away capacity remains dependent on rail deliveries to coastal refineries to remain adequate.

Low oil price associated with lifting of sanctions on Iran, a weak world economy, and capital movement to the Permian basin continued to depress drilling rig count.

Bakken BPD per well

Barrels per day per well continues to drop. In December it stood an 83 in the Bakken and 72 for all North Dakota.

Enno's Bakken

This great chart was produced by Enno Peters. It warrants a closer look. The data is in barrels per day.

Enno's Bakken 2

The two horizontal lines represent the 2015 peak and the 2015 peak production at the end of 2016.. And the difference is almost exactly one half million barrels per day.

But more important is the points I have placed in the ovals. Notice that production from 2016 wells in December changed very little from November 2016 wells. The decline was almost entirely from legacy production. That is from wells drilled prior to 2016.

If you look at Enno’s first chart you will notice that the decline was shared by a decline in production from every year prior to 2016.

According to the Director’s Cut, producing wells dropped by 183, from 13,520 to 13,337. 81 new wells were brought on line so that means 264 wells had to be shut down. the numbers from the North Dakota web site were different. They had the well count going from 13,201 to 13,013, a decline of 188. At any rate between 260 and 270 wells had to be shut down if either number is correct and 81 new wells were brought on line.

So we could conclude that the huge drop in legacy production was due to all those wells being shut down. But why were they shut down? Your first thought would be that they were shut down because of low production. But if that were the case, that they were mostly low producers, then the barrels per day per well should have risen. It did not. Barrels per day per well dropped by 6, from 78 bpd to 72 bpd.

Bruno 1

Bruno Verwimp sends us the above chart. The accuracy of his prediction is uncanny.

Bruno 2

And here is an amplification of his model with the actual data.

EIA Projection

The EIA has a far more optimistic take on Bakken production. That is their reference case.

EIA Projection 2

Here is their High Oil case and Low Oil case. The green is tight oil.

It is my opinion that the EIA is wildly over optimistic. More so concerning the Bakken but with other plays as well. Tight oil will be a complete bust. The Permian is performing well because it is mostly conventional production. But even the Permian will begin to decline by 2020 or shortly thereafter. All other shale plays are already in decline. But the idea that the Bakken will still be producing two million barrels per day in 2040 is ludicrous beyond belief.

 

peak oil barrel



8 Comments on "Is The Bakken a Bust?"

  1. Midnight Oil on Fri, 17th Feb 2017 2:07 am 

    Neil Young…After the Gold Rush…
    With a encore chorus…Rust Never Sleeps.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qol58JrNptY

  2. Nony on Fri, 17th Feb 2017 9:07 am 

    The webinar discusses winter shutins. From Ron’s remarks it is obvious that he didn’t listen to it. Instead lapsed into typical peaker suspicions.

  3. Jerome Purtzer on Fri, 17th Feb 2017 5:24 pm 

    My Mother is from North Dakota and she said that they knew about the Bakken when she was a young girl in the 40’s. Wasn’t economic to pull out of the ground then and nothing has changed except there are a lot more holes in the ground to prove it.

  4. Nony on Sat, 18th Feb 2017 9:50 pm 

    one of the reasons I prefer to suck heterosexual cock is because heterosexual men represent power and authority. They also remind me of my dad. You’d think there aren’t that many straight guys who want blow jobs from other guys but you’d be suprised. I put an ad on Craigslist and I’ve been doing at least 3 car dates a night. I never suck off gay dudes. That’s gross. But I can’t resist hetero cock.

  5. peakyeast on Sun, 19th Feb 2017 5:34 am 

    @Nony: Damn – that was funny!! Thanks for a good laugh… Much appreciated.

  6. Cloggie on Sun, 19th Feb 2017 6:17 am 

    @peakyeast, you don’t seriously think that Nony would say such a thing? It was POS Friday, who now begins to corrupt the forum through identity theft, which is very easy to do on this forum.

    Any admin worth his salt can identity via the ip-address and server logs from what corner of the globe these message come from (hint: West-Canada). Although it is still possible that it was posted via proxy or perhaps Friday was en route and the XXL hater and nihilist posted from an internet cafe.

    There is only one here who is “cock- and porn-obsessed” and that is Friday.

  7. peakyeast on Sun, 19th Feb 2017 7:35 am 

    @Clog: Sorry I do not have and have not had much time this past year to look at peakoil – so I wouldnt know.

    I just know Nony ALSO has a chronically offensive vocabulary and bad manners.

    But on second thought – you are right. It is probably identity theft and a false comment. Especially since I do not remember Nony as having a sense of humour and are waay to proud (a form of insecurity) to write something like this.

  8. peakyeast on Sun, 19th Feb 2017 7:36 am 

    I meant, of course: Cloggie.. Not Clog. Not trying to offend you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *