Secret report of the U.S. Ambassador to Kyrgyz Republic.

MarioPro · Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:51 pm Post subject:

We have two questions here (both claimed in
the U.S. Embassy Press Release)
one should consider separately:

[1] Was this "secret report" itself a fraudulent one;

[2] Does it (no matter fraudulent or not) misrepresents U.S. policy
toward Kyrgyzstan and its election process.

Aside the discussion whether the document (mis)represents
U.S. policy toward Kyrgyzstan and its election process, the
"Report" in question could be a fraudulent one too.
But if forged, it wasn't done amateurish, although the signature
(the autograph) of the U.S. Ambassador Steven. M. Young
could be found on internet and recycled for this purpose
(e.g. see his signature at this letter, when Steven. M. Young was
the Director of the Office of Chinese and Mongolian Affairs).
But, of course, even personal autographs might undergo certain
changes as time goes by, and "individual or individuals" would
know that a recent document must have the latest version of
the Ambassador's autograph. The samples of recent documents
signed by Steven. M. Young could be in the possession of unknown
number of Kyrgyz Republic officials as well as of diplomats and other
officials of the embassies in the Kyrgyz Republic, not to mention
the domestic and/or foreign intelligence agencies...

So, as I said above, aside the discussion whether the document
(mis)represents U.S. policy toward Kyrgyzstan and its election
process, remember that the old Cold War is still yet very lively one.

MarioPro Rolling Eyes

savethehumans · Light Sweet Crude Joined: Oct 20, 2004 Posts: 1541

Indeed, methinks they protest too much....

That's one heck of a fraud, if a fraud it is. Perfect diplomat-speak in the thing. And puts the U.S. in a "we will overcome the forces of evil" position. Without interfering, of course.... Rolling Eyes

This document is the real think, IMHO. And they'll see to it that we can NEVER prove it!