We cannot drill our way out of this oil crisis. Since 2000, oil companies working in the U.S. have doubled the number of wells drilled per year.
Although increased drilling has added new oil to the nation's supply, it has not done so fast enough to offset the terminal decline of existing fields.
We are going to have to import more of our oil. Period.
Joined: Oct 17, 2007 Posts: 113 Location: New of Zealand
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 5:49 pm Post subject: NZ: Economy b4 Environment
Another typical political failing. Basically all this talk of saving the planet is just for good PR. If it means there might be some tough times for residents and businesses then sod the environment.
Quote:
Prime Minister Helen Clark said yesterday that, as well as deferring until 2011 the inclusion of transport fuels within the emissions trading scheme, the Government proposed to delay the beginning of the phase-out of free allocations for trade-exposed sectors to 2018.
2018? Too late Helen. Personally I don't think emission trading schemes will work anyway, but its the principle of the matter. A scheme to try and ave the environment has been set back because it might hurt the wallet.
She has also slashed the 5c tax on petrol for Aucklanders because of current high gas prices. Originally it was to be 10c, then 5c, and now more likely to be 1c or 2c.
Joined: Jul 12, 2004 Posts: 126 Location: New Zealand
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 4:19 am Post subject: Re: NZ: Economy b4 Environment
Perhaps you should read this article from the NZ Herald. Global warming is bollocks, still if wrecking the economy makes you feel virtuous, then go ahead.
Joined: Sep 25, 2005 Posts: 1790 Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:30 am Post subject: Re: NZ: Economy b4 Environment
essex wrote:
Perhaps you should read this article from the NZ Herald. Global warming is bollocks, still if wrecking the economy makes you feel virtuous, then go ahead.
Nowhere in that article does it state, or even suggest, that "Global warming is bollocks". It seems that Terry Dunleavy believes that being 90% certain about the effect of human behaviour on our environment is not good enough to stop destroying our children's futures. He wants to be 100% certain without offering the same certainty that human behaviour is insignificant. That kind of attitude is reprehensible.
As far as wrecking the economy is concerned, it will do that all by itself. Haven't you heard that the earth has finite resources? Yet sustainability will now take a back seat as election fever/panic starts to bite and politicians vie with each other to offer the biggest tax cut. We need a strong economy, they say, when what they mean is "we need to keep living unsustainably". Funnily, enough, they never explain why that is better than living sustainably.
Emissions trading is probably useless, but the arguments expounded against it are also of little value. Ultimately, it doesn't matter how New Zealand fits into the world economy, but how it positions itself for a resource constrained future and much lowered world trade/transport.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
News
Discussions
Resources
Members
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
