Are we in overshoot? Do we need to reduce the world's population?
Yes
88%
[ 92 ]
No
11%
[ 12 ]
Total Votes : 104
Author
Message
mos6507 Fusion
Joined: Aug 03, 2007 Posts: 3154 Location: Boston Suburbs
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 4:45 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
Newfie wrote:
To be blunt about cannabalisim................
What is the difference between
A Killing some one and eating them so that we may live and
B Taking their food away and letting them die so you can drive a SUV?
In both cases one dies so that the other may not be inconvenienced.
Having read what I wrote, does not A seem less immoral than B. Yet we are doing B with biofuels ............... with little outcry. Should someone do A, there would be all hell to pay.
It just shows how hypocritical and narrow we are as a species.
To associate filling an SUV as an act of murder is hyperbole of the worst order.
Joined: Oct 04, 2007 Posts: 209 Location: North-East USA
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
funny how killing a deer and ripping out its guts and eating its flesh is considered perfectly normal but when the same process is applied to a human its horrible murder....
Joined: Aug 03, 2007 Posts: 3154 Location: Boston Suburbs
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:00 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
anarky321 wrote:
funny how killing a deer and ripping out its guts and eating its flesh is considered perfectly normal but when the same process is applied to a human its horrible murder....
Someone really should track you down by your IP address and lock you up...
...after pumping your stomach and checking its contents.
Joined: Oct 04, 2007 Posts: 209 Location: North-East USA
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
yes...lock me up for the heinous crime of free speech, i forgot that's illegal these days _________________ Tyler_JC:
"I love how every conversation on this website, given enough time, will turn into a discussion of cannibalism."
““Life is on the wire…the rest is just waiting””
Joined: Nov 15, 2007 Posts: 236 Location: US East Coast
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
mos6507 wrote:
To associate filling an SUV as an act of murder is hyperbole of the worst order.
Not in my book, it is just clear thinking and reasoning and being aware of the consequences of your actions.
If you shoot someone it is murder.
If you stab someone it is murder.
If you take somones larder and they starve it is murder.
The difference is that we are starving someone at a distance, not up close and personal. But there is a causual relationship.
The murder/die off will happen will happen one way or another. All I was commenting on was that we distance ourselves from the consequences of our actions. We protect our personal ego. _________________ When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
Joined: Oct 04, 2007 Posts: 209 Location: North-East USA
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:18 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
killing at a distance is always easier emotionally; thats a big part of why today we use firearms instead of meelee weapons; plus the larger the distance the more you can offload the blame
if you shoot stab someone with a sword your guilty; if you shoot someone from half a mile away you can claim it as a hunting accident...see my drift?
personally i think that if people had to kill others only with meelee weapons there'd be alot less killing going on because its alot easier to press a button and have a cruise missile take out half a block than it is to plunge a blade into someone's chest cavity over and over
yes, biofuels are murder (but i could make the murder argument for just about anything...farm combines are murder for example), i personally could care less - the name of the game is Survival, not "how many people can live peacefully with each other", i personally would rather drive an SUV than know that some Pakistani family got their rice rations that day; selfishness is bliss, complete selfishness is freedom _________________ Tyler_JC:
"I love how every conversation on this website, given enough time, will turn into a discussion of cannibalism."
““Life is on the wire…the rest is just waiting””
Joined: May 10, 2007 Posts: 2746 Location: The Entropisphere
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
Parts of the world do not seem to have much of a problem using machetes to do the work of killing for them.
Maybe you get use to it? _________________ "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain."
-Friedrich von Schiller
"What I try, may not work. It may be ineffective. It might even turn out in the pages of history to be the exact wrong thing to do, but I'm going to try to do what I c
Joined: Nov 15, 2007 Posts: 236 Location: US East Coast
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
Yes, we can get used to a lot of things. Good point.
And I was not trying to pass moral judgment on the SUV thing. Once me and mine are fine, which includes our necessary community, then I'll try to worry about others.
Now if I could just convince my wife.................. _________________ When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
Joined: May 27, 2007 Posts: 1203 Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:23 am Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
Overpopulation and peak oil: The perfect storm
In 1850, the world population lingered at 1 billion; in America it was 23 million. The world population is now closing in on 7 billion while here it nears 310 million. It was oil, and its cousin natural gas, that allowed the population to grow to unprecedented proportions as quickly as it did. As oil is depleted, it’s correct to assume the population will decrease proportionately.
In 1974, the government released a study (NSSM 200) that concluded the world population needed to be decreased drastically for humans to survive after peak oil without dire consequences. This was followed by the Carter administration’s Global 2000 document that said an immediate goal of less than 2 billion worldwide is necessary. Others suggest a world of no more than 500 million is more realistic.
Oil production is in decline, supergiants about to crash like a row dominoes; Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang. Horizontal drilling and water flooding of oil fields leads to maximum production followed by collapse; not the 'long, slow decline, forever' of Collin Campbell.
Fish stocks in the ocean are nearly depleted. Supporting 7 billion people is destroying the planet and will soon make it unihabitable. Without available oil, the planet at tops can support 1 billion sustainably(a better figure is probably about 250 million).
As the supply/demand gap increases and oil fields begin to crash, we will experience financial collapse worldwide. We will see disruptions in the transportation of food and other essentials. Not enough food will be able to be grown. People will begin to starve.
Social unrest is inevitable, threatening whatever infrastructure remains. Scavengers will dismantle the power grid to obtain "scrap" to sell to feed themselves and their family. The total irrevocable erosion of everything will commence.
Then we will experience FAMINE on a scale larger than ever seen in the history of mankind. Millions will wander the countryside eating EVERYTHING they find, like a plague of giant locusts. Pandemics will ensue as starving people have weakened immune systems. Wars, large and small, will continue over remaining resources.
Without intervention, Coal will be burned in it's entirety just to stave off the inevitable a little longer. Planetary thresholds are passed and we enter runaway global warming. Temperatures exceed survivable limits. GAME OVER.
OR... Informed Heads of State with the power to act, reduce the population in the near term to sustainable levels and avoid the end of mankind and the destruction of the planet. Take the action before the action takes itself with the dire consequences detailed above.
Everything mentioned in the above senario is ALREADY HAPPENING.
When I originally posted this on my blog, I believed action would make a difference, with the new data on methane clathrates in the arctic, it's obvious it's too late. _________________ In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
- George Orwell
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:49 am Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
I know Cid is loved by all, but please, quit kissing his ass. He wouldn't last long in the political world. So if you love him, and I know you do, keep him here, where its safe. _________________ HOLDING THE CENTER
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:07 am Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
Newfie wrote:
If you shoot someone it is murder.
If you stab someone it is murder.
If you take somones larder and they starve it is murder.
Not according to the penal code. For example, it might be self-defense.
Let us suppose we provide food to the starving. They become healthy and vigorous. Being healthy and vigorous, they decide to produce children. Those children are now starving. We conclude that we cannot support their irresponsible exponential growth. We terminate aid. They starve in large numbers.
So...was cutting off aid "murder"? Or was providing aid in the first place a still greater "crime"? I am pleased to report that I do not give to charity, and thus am innocent of enabling their population increase.
Increased food prices are generating nice profits for me. If the world's poor were so shortsighted that they didn't hedge increased commodity costs, that's their problem.
Joined: Nov 15, 2007 Posts: 236 Location: US East Coast
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:28 am Post subject: Re: Population Reduction and Rebuttal Thread
Jack wrote:
Newfie wrote:
If you shoot someone it is murder.
If you stab someone it is murder.
If you take somones larder and they starve it is murder.
Not according to the penal code. For example, it might be self-defense.
Let us suppose we provide food to the starving. They become healthy and vigorous. Being healthy and vigorous, they decide to produce children. Those children are now starving. We conclude that we cannot support their irresponsible exponential growth. We terminate aid. They starve in large numbers.
So...was cutting off aid "murder"? Or was providing aid in the first place a still greater "crime"? I am pleased to report that I do not give to charity, and thus am innocent of enabling their population increase.
Increased food prices are generating nice profits for me. If the world's poor were so shortsighted that they didn't hedge increased commodity costs, that's their problem.
Agreed. To be clear, I support murder.
Everyone does, in effect. They just hide from the realization.
What we are arguing about is the most humane form of murder.
Not pretty eh? _________________ When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum