| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Lanthanide Heavy Crude


Joined: Nov 24, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:33 pm Post subject: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
It seems to me, that with such a negligable military and such an underpopulated, moderate-climate and fertile country, we are going to be prime targets for invasion.
I think Australia isn't as badly placed as some other countries when it comes to PO, but Japan and China are definitly threats to the country. Seems to me that invasion by these nations is only a matter of time.
What think others? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
auscanman Heavy Crude


Joined: Dec 28, 2005 Posts: 299 Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:42 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
I wouldn't be so sure. I mean NZ has lots of fertile land available, but really doesn't have any resources that China is hungry for... well other than sheep
NZ and Japan have always struck me as an interesting contrast. They're a similar size, with similar climate, topography and quality of soil, and both lack deposits of metals or fossil fuels, yet NZ has less than 5% the population of Japan!
Given Japan's precarious situation the rise of WW2 style militarism there within the near future seems inevitable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
americandream Fission

![]()
Joined: Oct 18, 2004 Posts: 2124 Location: kiwibush
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
The Brits and Americans are already here. _________________ Bugger me, I hear oil's runnin out mate! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ohanian Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Oct 17, 2004 Posts: 1145
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:46 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
| auscanman wrote: |
Given Japan's precarious situation the rise of WW2 style militarism there within the near future seems inevitable. |
Have you actually been to Japan?
It's a country filled with old men and old women.
Do you really think they will send their precious young ones
to die in an invasion? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lanthanide Heavy Crude


Joined: Nov 24, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:59 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
The time frame I'm looking at here is ~2015 or later, assuming the SHTF between '08-10. Judging by recent events, it's looking like that could easily be next year.
Not many would die invading NZ, we have no real military force. We'd probably surrender, even. Unless some other country like US or OZ decided to protect us, but they'll have their own issues to worry about. And if they did stop in to protect us, it'd obviously be for their own benefit.
As for not wanting people to die in general - is it better to have millions of people in a country with little food, or send a few of them over to another country that has food? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Dark Lord


Joined: Aug 11, 2004 Posts: 5123
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:16 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
What if the invasion is by large numbers of starving, desperate Japanese, Chinese, Indonesians, and so on and so forth?
They get to your shores in battered boats (nothing worthy of the name ship) and vomit forth upon your shores.
What do you do? _________________ Dieoff. Fun to watch. Better with hot buttered popcorn!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
venky Intermediate Crude

![]()
Joined: Mar 13, 2005 Posts: 853
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:47 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
| Jack wrote: | What if the invasion is by large numbers of starving, desperate Japanese, Chinese, Indonesians, and so on and so forth?
They get to your shores in battered boats (nothing worthy of the name ship) and vomit forth upon your shores.
What do you do? |
Jack, I almost see you saliavating in anticipation..........  _________________ I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.
Only Man is vile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
venky Intermediate Crude

![]()
Joined: Mar 13, 2005 Posts: 853
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:51 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
Seriously though, I think an invasion of NZ is unlikely in the current world order. The US would intervene to protect its ally from naked aggression. And I dont mean to sound cynical or anything but they are not going to let a white mans island fall to any Asian horde.
The US would have to be weakened drastically before the current world order can be turned on its head. And I dont see that happening in our lifetimes, Peak Oil or no Peak Oil. _________________ I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.
Only Man is vile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kokoda Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Posts: 449
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:58 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
What makes you think that Oz won't invade you?
You have a damn sight more water then we do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lanthanide Heavy Crude


Joined: Nov 24, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:00 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
I guess that's the difference between us then. I'm thinking that the world order is drastically going to be changed within our lifetimes. Unless your definition of lifetime is something like "5 more years".
I don't see what USA would get out of protecting NZ if they're trying to fight off China, Japan, India or any other rivals - why would they care what happens to NZ? We don't have any abundant strategic resources, all we've really got is food which isn't going to help if you can't transport it back to the mainland. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
essex Heavy Crude


Joined: Jul 12, 2004 Posts: 183 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
| It's not aggression so much it's REFUGEES - a few boats , eg oil tankers on their last "run" could easily carry 100,000 people. So they run aground on the west coast of the North Island , what are you to do , shoot them ??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tyler_JC Moderator

![]()
Joined: Sep 25, 2004 Posts: 4715 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:07 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
Considering how much oil/money/energy it would take to invade a country like New Zealand and maintain the supply lines for several years...it doesn't seem like a logical reaction to Peak Oil. _________________ "www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Dark Lord


Joined: Aug 11, 2004 Posts: 5123
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:13 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
| venky wrote: |
Jack, I almost see you saliavating in anticipation..........  |
Who, me? (Quietly uses napkin to wipe drool off chin).
 _________________ Dieoff. Fun to watch. Better with hot buttered popcorn!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LastManInEurope Coal


Joined: Nov 13, 2007 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:26 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
| essex wrote: | | It's not aggression so much it's REFUGEES - a few boats , eg oil tankers on their last "run" could easily carry 100,000 people. So they run aground on the west coast of the North Island , what are you to do , shoot them ??? | This would be the most likely problem if it comes to it for NZ. Gunboats responding aggressively from the outset would be the only answer. Nasty, but true. By that time Europe would either have been overrrun or already have instituted such policies (probably on a local independent basis - some of our unhanged traitors no doubt taking refuge in NZ).
Last edited by LastManInEurope on Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lanthanide Heavy Crude


Joined: Nov 24, 2007 Posts: 140 Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:26 pm Post subject: Re: NZ - Sitting duck for Japan or others? |
|
|
| Tyler_JC wrote: | | Considering how much oil/money/energy it would take to invade a country like New Zealand and maintain the supply lines for several years...it doesn't seem like a logical reaction to Peak Oil. |
Hmm, thinking about it more and it does seem a little unlikely.
I was mainly thinking of it as a way to deposit excess population - but surely the cheaper option is just to let them all die, rather than trying to ship them to another country.
So the refugee situation is more likely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|