Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:48 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
Less random gas shortage predictions might lend a little more creditability to the issue.
I remember a thread last March about how we would see major gas shortages across the US by summer. Well that came and went only to be followed up by another string of useless predictions for this summer.
The more people cry wolf, them less credibility this serious issue gets. People have been calling for energy shortages for 50 years, how do you convince people- Okay, NOW we are really serious, we have to do something?
Joined: Apr 05, 2007 Posts: 153 Location: Great Britain
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:51 pm Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
I do think this is a very good point. there is a lot of "we're doomed" and "I hope it happens quickly to smite those nasty people who have been successful/not listened/not agreed with what i said" or simply people that shelled out a lot of money for a bunker in the middle of nowhere and are now beginning to getting a slight uneasy feeling that they might just be wrong (again) but then quickly rationalise it that it was that damned capitalist who sold them the bunker fault.
The net result: even more ridicule from members of the public, slightly better in Britain as important to have at least one eccenticity! and even more extreme angry people who embarassed that they have been shown to obe wrong seem to adopt a double or nothing approach.
The reality: PO is a pretty serious issue which is going to be a big contributor to an energy price/source crisis over the next decade which will hit the US and Africa the hardest and probably cause a prolonged recession until Chindia dig us all out of it c. ten years later. The earlier and wider the message is believed the less extreme and more managed this period will be.
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:26 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
Smudger wrote:
The reality: PO is a pretty serious issue which is going to be a big contributor to an energy price/source crisis over the next decade which will hit the US and Africa the hardest and probably cause a prolonged recession until Chindia dig us all out of it c. ten years later. The earlier and wider the message is believed the less extreme and more managed this period will be.
I am far from a doomer (I am a pragmatist, a serious investor and I do research in the energy area), but I am also far from a blind optimist.
How/why do you know things will be that rosy?
How (exactly) will Chindia save us?
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:25 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
Ming wrote:
Smudger wrote:
The reality: PO is a pretty serious issue which is going to be a big contributor to an energy price/source crisis over the next decade which will hit the US and Africa the hardest and probably cause a prolonged recession until Chindia dig us all out of it c. ten years later. The earlier and wider the message is believed the less extreme and more managed this period will be.
I am far from a doomer (I am a pragmatist, a serious investor and I do research in the energy area), but I am also far from a blind optimist.
How/why do you know things will be that rosy?
How (exactly) will Chindia save us?
Ming, it is very common knowledge here on peak oil dot com that
a) America will suffer because it is evil and produces nothing that anyone wants to buy;
b) Africa will suffer because they are poor and they have no commodities, base metals or energy to sell, but even if they did that neo-Colonialism means they are not properly organized anyway to manage their wealth, so it will be stolen by evil American companies;
c) India despite being economic basket cases for so long including floods, famines and ongoing civil wars to yet partition parts of the Indian sub-continent - India, Pakistan, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Kashmir, etc - into ever smaller ethnic enclaves is actually creating more knowledge than America; and
d) China is the source of all wealth as you can tell by their UN Human Development score and the state of their environment proving that 'China Inc's Jobs At Any Cost Policy' is far superior to any other economic model elsewhere in the world because they have a Trade Surplus and large Foreign Exchange Reserves, and apparently those are the only two economic criteria that count for anything?
So WTSHTF of course only Chindia with their far superior economic models and knowledge can save us poor misguided fools. Heck, they probably already have fusion all figured out? _________________ The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:55 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
MrBill wrote:
a) America will suffer because it is evil and produces nothing that anyone wants to buy;
That is wrong. The United States produces a lot of internet blowhards who use and abuse their bandwidth like they do their kleenex box.
MrBill wrote:
b) Africa will suffer because they are poor and they have no commodities, base metals or energy to sell, but even if they did that neo-Colonialism means they are not properly organized anyway to manage their wealth, so it will be stolen by evil American companies;
true
MrBill wrote:
c) India despite being economic basket cases for so long including floods, famines and ongoing civil wars to yet partition parts of the Indian sub-continent - India, Pakistan, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Kashmir, etc - into ever smaller ethnic enclaves is actually creating more knowledge than America; and
No one creates knowledge better than the US. We have patents, copywrites, and intellectual property in places other folks don't even have places. We've placed all our energies not into the manufacturing sphere but in our own belly buttons to create thoughts, theories, and investment schemes that are increasingly meaningless.
MrBill wrote:
d) China is the source of all wealth as you can tell by their UN Human Development score and the state of their environment proving that 'China Inc's Jobs At Any Cost Policy' is far superior to any other economic model elsewhere in the world because they have a Trade Surplus and large Foreign Exchange Reserves, and apparently those are the only two economic criteria that count for anything?
So WTSHTF of course only Chindia with their far superior economic models and knowledge can save us poor misguided fools. Heck, they probably already have fusion all figured out?
The United States won the Cold War and challenged China to beat us at our own game--making stuff. It was assumed this would eventually create a consumer class in China thus increasing demand for our intellectual property. But the Chinese (like the Japanese before them) have long memories. They didn't really lose the cold war, they just switched the flags around. The Chinese will soon own us and our toy manufacturing infrastructure and steal (as Brazil and Thailand already have in pharmaceuticals) our intellectual property for their own people. And there will be nothing we can do about it. _________________ ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
Peak oil...it is just a theory. That is what my wife's lady friend stockbroker told her.
Dismissing peak oil as 'just a theory' is an easy and quick way to rebut PO.
If the question is when we will peak - yes we can only theorize.
If the question is if we will peak - then it is not a theory and only a question of time.
No one knows the exact peak date for world oil production, but we do know that time will come in the not so distant future. But finding the peak is not hard problem once we can look back on it by a few years...but we need some time to do it...again, only time will settle this debate.
And the possibility may be that we find another big discovery and the peak dates look more like a double top stock market chart than the drop over a cliff.
But all this does not really matter. The bottom line is we are running out of crude no matter how the hard the spin doctors try to masturbate the facts.
The fact that 'we have to estimate' reserves or useful life of anything says that the item in question does not have an infinite supply or life span.
I never argue with persons claiming that we have peaked already or others that claim the peak is 20 years away. To me they are both on the same page, just looking at different paragraphs.
But the person that thinks that the world can go on forever using 31,000,000,000 barrels a year of crude and never have to pay the bill with the eventual depletion of fossil fuels is just plain wrong.
"If the public does think briefly about future oil supplies, the question usually asked is, "How long will oil last?" This is the wrong question. Oil will be extracted in some insignificant quantity perhaps 200 years from now. The critical question is: When does the peak of world oil production occur?" ~ Richard C. Duncan
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:08 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
Allen et al,
Here's a thought which popped to mind while reading Saudi's latest press release. It goes to Allen consideration of the actually timing of PO:
I believe the most recent press releases from Saudi Arabia can be taken as an admission the kingdom now believes they have reached Peak Oil.
Consider the KSA’s base positions:
1)The market is adequately supplied.
2) Much of the price run up is due to speculation.
3)The KSA has sufficient excess capacity to deliver significantly more oil to the market should there be a demand for it.
Now consider the new press releases from the KSA:
1)Khurais Field will come online next June at 1.2 million bopd.
2)The plan is to increase their current 11 million bopd capacity to 12.5 million bopd.
3)The cost to build this expanded deliverability is $10 billion.
If the KSA believes the market will require an additional 1.2 mm bopd next June they currently have, by their own admission, the capacity to meet the demand: 11 mm bopd – 9.6 mm bopd (current production rate) = 1.4 m bopd. Thus why spend $10 billion to add unneeded capacity. Granted in time the extra capacity will be required but according to their statements current deliverability is more than adequate to meet any demand increase in the immediate future.
You’re really left with only two conclusions (but please off any others that pop to mind):
1)The KSA didn’t really have a better use for the $10 billion right now and doesn’t mind the new production facilities sitting there idle. (and that’s a really bad idea: such equipment doesn't “age” very well if it’s not being utilized)
2)The KSA knows their true production capabilities and decline rates better than anyone else and projects a real demand for the additional NET capacity in a year.
Even if there’s a significant global recession (as there was in the early 80’s) and the price of oil drops 75% (like it did in 1986) to $40/bbl then the new production would still earn the KSA about $13 billion net (I’m guessing lifting costs of around $10/bbl).
Hmmm….recover the new costs with less than a year’s production even if the global economy slumps and consumption drops (like it did in the early 80’s). And then the KSA can open the wells up and grab a bigger chunk of market share just like they did when they drove oil down to $10/bbl in 1986.
Double Hmmm…..if a global recession puts PO off a few more years than the KSA is in a great position to capture more of the market and still make a handsome return. And if the world figures how out to prosper (or at least survive) with high oil prices then the KSA is in a great position to capture more of the market and make an more handsome return.
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:03 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
Good points. Either way they have a strangle hold on conventional oil production going forward as non-OPEC oil production is hardly growing at all, while we all know some older fields are already in steep decline.
Therefore, Saudi's real risk is energy conservation and a switch to alternatives that destroys 'potential' demand, and not the situation they faced a decade earlier when new non-OPEC supply came on-line.
And as the lowest cost producer, the price setter so to speak, they also control the economics of non-conventional oil production if future demand turns up weaker than expected. If not, then they share the total energy pie with non-conventional oil in a market with tight supply and growing demand.
That chart only goes up to 2006, and we all know what has happened to crude oil prices since then.
It is all about the money. A wealth transfer of unparalleled proportions. Or at least comparable with Spain's discovery of gold in the New World.
_________________ The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:13 am Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
It's easy Nicky: smart people make better decisions than stupid people. And since many of the worst aspects of life are caused by bad decisions the benefit is obvious.
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3Next
Page 2 of 3
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum