Peak Oil News

 

  Login or Register
 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forums Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Members
 Your Account
 Members List
 Ignore List
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
google
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 
Member Quotes
If "it's bunker time" why the fark do you care about the price of gold? You evolved some enzyme that lets you digest the stuff?

Narz

Suggest Quote

 
aspo08
 
ICM
Cisco & Net App Training
 
Peak Oil News: Forums

Peakoil.com :: View topic - Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Studies & Energy Reports
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert


Joined: Jun 25, 2004
Posts: 2060

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I wonder could I convince my bosses at work that we need to buy that report as we are in the process of a major energy efficiecy awareness drive?

As Sun Tzu would say "know your enemy".
_________________
www.askaboutenergy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jbeckton
Expert
Expert


Joined: Jan 05, 2007
Posts: 1920

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:48 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Less random gas shortage predictions might lend a little more creditability to the issue.

I remember a thread last March about how we would see major gas shortages across the US by summer. Well that came and went only to be followed up by another string of useless predictions for this summer.

The more people cry wolf, them less credibility this serious issue gets. People have been calling for energy shortages for 50 years, how do you convince people- Okay, NOW we are really serious, we have to do something?

Doomers hurt their own cause.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vision-master
Fusion
Fusion


Joined: May 18, 2006
Posts: 4324
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

The World has ended so many times. Makes ya wonder, huh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Smudger
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Apr 05, 2007
Posts: 155
Location: Great Britain

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I do think this is a very good point. there is a lot of "we're doomed" and "I hope it happens quickly to smite those nasty people who have been successful/not listened/not agreed with what i said" or simply people that shelled out a lot of money for a bunker in the middle of nowhere and are now beginning to getting a slight uneasy feeling that they might just be wrong (again) but then quickly rationalise it that it was that damned capitalist who sold them the bunker fault.

The net result: even more ridicule from members of the public, slightly better in Britain as important to have at least one eccenticity! and even more extreme angry people who embarassed that they have been shown to obe wrong seem to adopt a double or nothing approach.

The reality: PO is a pretty serious issue which is going to be a big contributor to an energy price/source crisis over the next decade which will hit the US and Africa the hardest and probably cause a prolonged recession until Chindia dig us all out of it c. ten years later. The earlier and wider the message is believed the less extreme and more managed this period will be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ming
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Posts: 271

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:26 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Smudger wrote:
The reality: PO is a pretty serious issue which is going to be a big contributor to an energy price/source crisis over the next decade which will hit the US and Africa the hardest and probably cause a prolonged recession until Chindia dig us all out of it c. ten years later. The earlier and wider the message is believed the less extreme and more managed this period will be.

I am far from a doomer (I am a pragmatist, a serious investor and I do research in the energy area), but I am also far from a blind optimist.

How/why do you know things will be that rosy?
How (exactly) will Chindia save us?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
MrBill
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 5362
Location: Eurasia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:25 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Ming wrote:
Smudger wrote:
The reality: PO is a pretty serious issue which is going to be a big contributor to an energy price/source crisis over the next decade which will hit the US and Africa the hardest and probably cause a prolonged recession until Chindia dig us all out of it c. ten years later. The earlier and wider the message is believed the less extreme and more managed this period will be.

I am far from a doomer (I am a pragmatist, a serious investor and I do research in the energy area), but I am also far from a blind optimist.

How/why do you know things will be that rosy?
How (exactly) will Chindia save us?


Ming, it is very common knowledge here on peak oil dot com that

a) America will suffer because it is evil and produces nothing that anyone wants to buy;

b) Africa will suffer because they are poor and they have no commodities, base metals or energy to sell, but even if they did that neo-Colonialism means they are not properly organized anyway to manage their wealth, so it will be stolen by evil American companies;

c) India despite being economic basket cases for so long including floods, famines and ongoing civil wars to yet partition parts of the Indian sub-continent - India, Pakistan, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Kashmir, etc - into ever smaller ethnic enclaves is actually creating more knowledge than America; and

d) China is the source of all wealth as you can tell by their UN Human Development score and the state of their environment proving that 'China Inc's Jobs At Any Cost Policy' is far superior to any other economic model elsewhere in the world because they have a Trade Surplus and large Foreign Exchange Reserves, and apparently those are the only two economic criteria that count for anything?

So WTSHTF of course only Chindia with their far superior economic models and knowledge can save us poor misguided fools. Heck, they probably already have fusion all figured out?
_________________
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ming
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude


Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Posts: 271

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:39 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
Heck, they probably already have fusion all figured out?

Either that or things will not look good for them, in spite of their superb economic models…
They have too much population... Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pstarr
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 7089
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:55 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

MrBill wrote:
a) America will suffer because it is evil and produces nothing that anyone wants to buy;
That is wrong. The United States produces a lot of internet blowhards who use and abuse their bandwidth like they do their kleenex box.

MrBill wrote:
b) Africa will suffer because they are poor and they have no commodities, base metals or energy to sell, but even if they did that neo-Colonialism means they are not properly organized anyway to manage their wealth, so it will be stolen by evil American companies;
true

MrBill wrote:
c) India despite being economic basket cases for so long including floods, famines and ongoing civil wars to yet partition parts of the Indian sub-continent - India, Pakistan, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Kashmir, etc - into ever smaller ethnic enclaves is actually creating more knowledge than America; and
No one creates knowledge better than the US. We have patents, copywrites, and intellectual property in places other folks don't even have places. We've placed all our energies not into the manufacturing sphere but in our own belly buttons to create thoughts, theories, and investment schemes that are increasingly meaningless.

MrBill wrote:
d) China is the source of all wealth as you can tell by their UN Human Development score and the state of their environment proving that 'China Inc's Jobs At Any Cost Policy' is far superior to any other economic model elsewhere in the world because they have a Trade Surplus and large Foreign Exchange Reserves, and apparently those are the only two economic criteria that count for anything?

So WTSHTF of course only Chindia with their far superior economic models and knowledge can save us poor misguided fools. Heck, they probably already have fusion all figured out?
The United States won the Cold War and challenged China to beat us at our own game--making stuff. It was assumed this would eventually create a consumer class in China thus increasing demand for our intellectual property. But the Chinese (like the Japanese before them) have long memories. They didn't really lose the cold war, they just switched the flags around. The Chinese will soon own us and our toy manufacturing infrastructure and steal (as Brazil and Thailand already have in pharmaceuticals) our intellectual property for their own people. And there will be nothing we can do about it.
_________________
director ree rah rip ram. sunofabitch godamn. hidey didey christ almighty. rah rah crap wav
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GreenOil08
Coal
Coal


Joined: Mar 14, 2008
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

CERA is funny. They just don't get it. Do they? We're all ******. Every last one of us!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
allenwrench
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: Apr 23, 2008
Posts: 840

PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:15 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Peak oil...it is just a theory. That is what my wife's lady friend stockbroker told her.

Dismissing peak oil as 'just a theory' is an easy and quick way to rebut PO.

If the question is when we will peak - yes we can only theorize.

If the question is if we will peak - then it is not a theory and only a question of time.

No one knows the exact peak date for world oil production, but we do know that time will come in the not so distant future. But finding the peak is not hard problem once we can look back on it by a few years...but we need some time to do it...again, only time will settle this debate.

And the possibility may be that we find another big discovery and the peak dates look more like a double top stock market chart than the drop over a cliff.



But all this does not really matter. The bottom line is we are running out of crude no matter how the hard the spin doctors try to masturbate the facts.

The fact that 'we have to estimate' reserves or useful life of anything says that the item in question does not have an infinite supply or life span.

I never argue with persons claiming that we have peaked already or others that claim the peak is 20 years away. To me they are both on the same page, just looking at different paragraphs.

But the person that thinks that the world can go on forever using 31,000,000,000 barrels a year of crude and never have to pay the bill with the eventual depletion of fossil fuels is just plain wrong.

"If the public does think briefly about future oil supplies, the question usually asked is, "How long will oil last?" This is the wrong question. Oil will be extracted in some insignificant quantity perhaps 200 years from now. The critical question is: When does the peak of world oil production occur?" ~ Richard C. Duncan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ROCKMAN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 27, 2008
Posts: 776
Location: TEXAS

PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:08 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Allen et al,

Here's a thought which popped to mind while reading Saudi's latest press release. It goes to Allen consideration of the actually timing of PO:


I believe the most recent press releases from Saudi Arabia can be taken as an admission the kingdom now believes they have reached Peak Oil.

Consider the KSA’s base positions:

1)The market is adequately supplied.
2) Much of the price run up is due to speculation.
3)The KSA has sufficient excess capacity to deliver significantly more oil to the market should there be a demand for it.

Now consider the new press releases from the KSA:

1)Khurais Field will come online next June at 1.2 million bopd.
2)The plan is to increase their current 11 million bopd capacity to 12.5 million bopd.
3)The cost to build this expanded deliverability is $10 billion.


If the KSA believes the market will require an additional 1.2 mm bopd next June they currently have, by their own admission, the capacity to meet the demand: 11 mm bopd – 9.6 mm bopd (current production rate) = 1.4 m bopd. Thus why spend $10 billion to add unneeded capacity. Granted in time the extra capacity will be required but according to their statements current deliverability is more than adequate to meet any demand increase in the immediate future.

You’re really left with only two conclusions (but please off any others that pop to mind):

1)The KSA didn’t really have a better use for the $10 billion right now and doesn’t mind the new production facilities sitting there idle. (and that’s a really bad idea: such equipment doesn't “age” very well if it’s not being utilized)
2)The KSA knows their true production capabilities and decline rates better than anyone else and projects a real demand for the additional NET capacity in a year.

Even if there’s a significant global recession (as there was in the early 80’s) and the price of oil drops 75% (like it did in 1986) to $40/bbl then the new production would still earn the KSA about $13 billion net (I’m guessing lifting costs of around $10/bbl).

Hmmm….recover the new costs with less than a year’s production even if the global economy slumps and consumption drops (like it did in the early 80’s). And then the KSA can open the wells up and grab a bigger chunk of market share just like they did when they drove oil down to $10/bbl in 1986.

Double Hmmm…..if a global recession puts PO off a few more years than the KSA is in a great position to capture more of the market and still make a handsome return. And if the world figures how out to prosper (or at least survive) with high oil prices then the KSA is in a great position to capture more of the market and make an more handsome return.

Damn...those Swiss economist are smart.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MrBill
Expert
Expert


Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 5362
Location: Eurasia

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:03 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Good points. Either way they have a strangle hold on conventional oil production going forward as non-OPEC oil production is hardly growing at all, while we all know some older fields are already in steep decline.

Therefore, Saudi's real risk is energy conservation and a switch to alternatives that destroys 'potential' demand, and not the situation they faced a decade earlier when new non-OPEC supply came on-line.

And as the lowest cost producer, the price setter so to speak, they also control the economics of non-conventional oil production if future demand turns up weaker than expected. If not, then they share the total energy pie with non-conventional oil in a market with tight supply and growing demand.



That chart only goes up to 2006, and we all know what has happened to crude oil prices since then.



It is all about the money. A wealth transfer of unparalleled proportions. Or at least comparable with Spain's discovery of gold in the New World.


_________________
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ROCKMAN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 27, 2008
Posts: 776
Location: TEXAS

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:21 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Spain's discovery of gold in the New World....a great analogy Mr. Bill. Works on quit a few levels when you ponder it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nickynicky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands


Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:37 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Let us say you succeed tomorrow in convincing the whole world of peak oil imminence. How will this help anything?

(I mean, this web site becomes worth 20 billion dollars, but other than that?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ROCKMAN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude


Joined: May 27, 2008
Posts: 776
Location: TEXAS

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:13 am    Post subject: Re: Why the “Peak Oil” Theory Falls Down (CERA Report) Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

It's easy Nicky: smart people make better decisions than stupid people. And since many of the worst aspects of life are caused by bad decisions the benefit is obvious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version    Peakoil.com Forum Index -> Peak Oil Studies & Energy Reports All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Atom News FeedRSS 1.0 News FeedRSS 2.0 News FeedRSS Forums Feed