| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bonjaski Heavy Crude


Joined: Feb 07, 2006 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:52 pm Post subject: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
i would like to share my experience
i bought a lancia musa 1.3 multijet 90PS,
http://www.lanciamusa.it/
a great car in every aspect.
i now used it for the first 5500km and i only consume 3.8 liter diesel on 100km
~60mpg
i don't drive in cities and usually i don't drive faster then 100km/hour.
everyone could do that (not a great deal),
so with that and that a lot of transport could be done with trains.
i think its its easy to live very well with only 50% of todays oil consumption.
Additionally we can (already with todays technology) substitute 50% of that with biofuels.
so where is the problem?
that 2030 we won't have 30mio barrels and 30mio barrels of biofuels?
(with that and 60mpg even 100mio of chinese and 100mio of indians can drive)
that 2060 we won't have 15mio barrels and some improvements in biofuels?
that we need oil for biofuels?
that the EROEI of biofuels is negative ?
all things that even at peakoil.com were proven to be wrong,
so peakoil is not a problem.
for one interested in economics and science its an interesting event ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zardoz Expert


Joined: Dec 02, 2005 Posts: 6688 Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:59 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| bonjaski wrote: | | ...it's an interesting event... |
It's going to be the most "interesting" event in the history of the human race. _________________ "Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dinopello Fusion


Joined: May 13, 2005 Posts: 3032 Location: The Urban Village
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:06 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| Zardoz wrote: | | bonjaski wrote: | | ...it's an interesting event... |
It's going to be the most "interesting" event in the history of the human race. |
| Quote: | May you live in interesting event times. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pup55 Expert


Joined: May 26, 2004 Posts: 3818
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:55 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
You have two problems:
One is, you are going to have to get people out of their present cars. The longer you take to do this, the less the savings.
The other problem is much bigger: If the auto fleet grows exactly as fast as the population (about 1.5% per year, which is the current growth rate), by approximately 2050, there will be twice as many cars as there are now. So, effectively, by then, you will be using the same amount of gas that you are right now, even if you did somehow manage to convert the whole fleet from 30 mpg cars over to these 60 mpg Lancias.
You can keep ahead of the curve (temporarily) by making Lancias more efficient over time. On average, the rate of improvement in efficiency will have to be greater than the rate of the growth of the fleet, or eventually, the numbers will catch up with you.
But, more likely, diminishing returns will catch up to you. You will reach a limit on how efficient you can make a Lancia.
So, what this all comes down to is that at some point in the day, you are going to have to tell someone they are not going to be able to drive. You can wait around until 2050 if you want, or you can do it today, it makes no difference.
No, I take it back, it does make a difference. If you wait until 2050 to do it, you will tick off twice as many people as you would if you did it today. Also, the global warming types will argue that today is better as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Dark Lord


Joined: Aug 11, 2004 Posts: 5123
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Revi Fusion


Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Posts: 3460 Location: Maine
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:31 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
I agree with the original poster. We can have a decent life with half the fossil fuels. We've done it in our household. Click on the symbol with the little house and www below to see our energy saving projects. The problem is getting others to follow. They seem determined to use more, not less even if it bankrupts them. Eventually I'd like to see people using cars like these:
www.sunnev.com
If we switched to lightweight solar charged transportation, there would be no crisis. We could use high speed trains between cities. In an ideal world there would be no problems with peak oil. Unfortunately people will freak out when they can't get as much fossil fuel. There will be a painful transition period, but it's inevitable. We'll be out of our cars by mid-century at the latest.
If you told somebody in 1907 that in a few years the Model T would make it possible for the average person to own a car they would have laughed. It's 2007, and in just a few years something is going to happen to the car. Maybe something better will come along. Let's hope so, or we'll all be walking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ReserveGrowthRulz permanently banned

Joined: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 818
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:38 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| bonjaski wrote: |
so peakoil is not a problem.
for one interested in economics and science its an interesting event ... |
Another exceptional individual. Feel free to hang around, and we'll try and convert these heathens together.
What is obvious to us apparently takes a WEE bit of effort for the less talented. But we shall persevere! If only because we're 18 months post peak ( according to THEIR prophets ) and guess what? Nobody much has noticed.....not even them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TreebeardsUncle Intermediate Crude

![]()
Joined: Jun 15, 2006 Posts: 600
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:39 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
Hi.
Well, biofuels are and will not be as efficient a source of energy as oil which indicates that they should be more expensive than oil.
Well, actually, why not hope that nothing better than cars come along so most eveyone will be walking?
g |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
master_rb Heavy Crude


Joined: Feb 06, 2006 Posts: 166 Location: passaic, new jersey
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:47 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
i have exactly the same opinion, there is so much room for conservation, only the price will force people to do that
we have people coming and picking up a few dvd's with ford explorers, do we need to drag a 3 ton monster to get a dvd?
getting along with the 50% of our today's usage can be done but people need to be responsible, it won't happen till the price of oil goes really high
i'm just scared of the markets reactions when the PO arrives, with energy constraint on, it's going to be hard to find investors, it might turn out to be another 1929, with this economic system anything is possible, today even a bomb exposion somewhere makes the markets nervous, with PO on it might turn out to be a disaster, we could get through with PO on for a long time if people were preparing for it and we had a different economic system but with the way it is now anything is possible |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snax Tar Sands


Joined: Jan 20, 2007 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:32 pm Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| TreebeardsUncle wrote: | Hi.
Well, biofuels are and will not be as efficient a source of energy as oil which indicates that they should be more expensive than oil.
|
Being a domestic product for the US anyway, there is at least one layer of middle men cut out of the pricing structure with reduced cost of delivery.
The bottom line is that biofuels are sold today at prices that are comparable to petrol fuels by independent startups who are presumeably making enough money to stay in business. That seems to suggest the efficiency issue is less efficacious to price than you believe it should be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
max_power29 Intermediate Crude


Joined: Mar 23, 2005 Posts: 943 Location: Orygun
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:22 am Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| snax wrote: |
The bottom line is that biofuels are sold today at prices that are comparable to petrol fuels by independent startups who are presumeably making enough money to stay in business. That seems to suggest the efficiency issue is less efficacious to price than you believe it should be. |
Yeah! Government subsidies sure are good at making bioscams "efficient".
*sarcasm*Those start-ups sure are independent!*sarcasm*
Let the inflation and starvation begin! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taskforce_Unity Heavy Crude


Joined: Nov 22, 2004 Posts: 487 Location: Holland
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:03 am Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
Bonjaski, from the perspective of physics your observation is correct, there is much room for savings. The first flaw is that you are not looking at it from a global perspective. The 3 billion people that want cars cannot save from their current consumption, since they do not yet consume.
The second flaw is that you ignore human psychology, We do not want to drive smaller cars that are more efficient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Concerned Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Sep 23, 2004 Posts: 1550
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:22 am Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| ReserveGrowthRulz wrote: | | bonjaski wrote: |
so peakoil is not a problem.
for one interested in economics and science its an interesting event ... |
Another exceptional individual. Feel free to hang around, and we'll try and convert these heathens together.
What is obvious to us apparently takes a WEE bit of effort for the less talented. But we shall persevere! If only because we're 18 months post peak ( according to THEIR prophets ) and guess what? Nobody much has noticed.....not even them. |
Well I don't know about phrophets but the stuff I've been reading says 2010-12.
Stay tuned. _________________ "Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peripato Heavy Crude


Joined: May 03, 2005 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:14 am Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| bonjaski wrote: | | so where is the problem? |
That peak oil is not just about liquid transportation fuels. Its biggest impact may well be on agricultural production at all levels. Ironically this impact may well be compounded in large part from a massive biofuels production effort.
That long-term efficiency savings and conversation are probably incompatible with a growth economy, and definitely incompatible with an exponentially growing population which will eat away at any such gains within a few short years.
That peak oil is just the thin edge of the wedge. There are many converging disasters looming over the horizon leaving little room for optimism.
The optimism, or rather complacency, apparent in your argument also pervades all levels of leadership from government to private enterprise to the media. It is a form of denial, and is strongly suggests that we will in all likelihood sleepwalk our way right into the path of at least one of those looming catastrophes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bonjaski Heavy Crude


Joined: Feb 07, 2006 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:26 am Post subject: Re: peakoil is not a problem |
|
|
| peripato wrote: | | bonjaski wrote: | | so where is the problem? |
That peak oil is not just about liquid transportation fuels. Its biggest impact may well be on agricultural production at all levels. Ironically this impact may well be compounded in large part from a massive biofuels production effort.
That long-term efficiency savings and conversation are probably incompatible with a growth economy, and definitely incompatible with an exponentially growing population which will eat away at any such gains within a few short years.
That peak oil is just the thin edge of the wedge. There are many converging disasters looming over the horizon leaving little room for optimism.
|
i know that there are many issues beyond transport
but transportation accounts for 70% of oil use,
only a fraction ges into industry
not only my use of diesel nearly halfed,
we don't use oil,gas to heat our house
(we use central heating power from wood)
1,5% growth in car use, will be indeed a problem,
but i don't think that in india, china, brasil car use will grow forever,
maybe china and india will introduce some limits like London or Singapur (they have overpopulated areas)
and i am a friend of high gasoline price
5$ per gallone won't kill us, but maybe save the world and our way of living
sorry for my english and my optimism,
but this my experience with my car and heating of our house changed my view a lot
i had more fears before |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|