| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Was this quiz effective to you? |
| Yes |
|
100% |
[ 12 ] |
| No |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Daculling Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Apr 12, 2005 Posts: 1357
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:43 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
I require a lot of acres for my food, guess that's why I need to lose weight... but much better than most Americans.
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 1.2
SHELTER 2.7
GOODS/SERVICES 2.7
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 14
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. _________________ -Dac
Winners never quit and quiters never win, but those that never win and never quit are idiots. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
holmes Fission

![]()
Joined: Oct 12, 2004 Posts: 2412
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:25 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
| what got me was my aprtment. I figured this hole i live in would be low. I need to move down to the farking homeless shanty down by the river. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheTurtle Fission


Joined: May 14, 2005 Posts: 2123 Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:07 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
| holmes wrote: | | If we kept our farking breeding rates down to an intelligent advanced level we could do almost anything we wanted and the earth would recycle the waste products and impacts. |
"farking breeding" ... isn't that redundant?
| holmes wrote: | | I scored a 16. |
I scored an 8 ... despite happily eating meat each and every day. I just knew living in a tiny house and driving a tiny car would pay off some day!
| Quote: |
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.8 PLANETS. |
Oh well, if I get the chance to retire in a couple more years, I'll sell the car, build a green (and even smaller) house and raise a few chickens to supplement my foraging. I should be able to make it down to < 1.0 planet then.  _________________ “Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rostov Heavy Crude


Joined: Jan 29, 2005 Posts: 362 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
FOOD 1.5
MOBILITY 1.1
SHELTER 0.5
GOODS/SERVICES 1.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4.7
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 8.7 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.6 PLANETS.
Time to power down. I wonder what the algorithm for the test is like? Wanna do this with pen and paper in days when there's no longer connection or hosting
Gives me a thought : wars or painful events reducing population is going to have a chance to hurt the environment as well.... _________________ regards,
Rostov
"Some {} are more equal than others" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrBean Light Sweet Crude


Joined: Sep 26, 2004 Posts: 1144
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:10 am Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.1
MOBILITY 0.5
SHELTER 0.8
GOODS/SERVICES 1.5
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 3.9
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 8.4 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.2 PLANETS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Laughs_Last Intermediate Crude

![]()
Joined: Jul 26, 2005 Posts: 850
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 8:47 am Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
[deleted by author]
Last edited by Laughs_Last on Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OilBurner Heavy Crude


Joined: Jun 03, 2004 Posts: 417 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:34 am Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
Bummer. Did this again, and less than 2 years on, I've gotten more resource hungry:
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.8
MOBILITY 1.5
SHELTER 0.6
GOODS/SERVICES 1.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 5.5
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.1 PLANETS.
Whoops! If the world is a worse place since 2004, it's all my fault...  _________________ Burning the midnight oil, whilst I still can. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lateralus Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jul 04, 2006 Posts: 755 Location: Hockeyland
|
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:46 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
I scored an 8 which is below the average of 8.8 for my neck of the woods.
I'm going to go for a drive and throw my styrofoam cups out the window to celebrate. I've got 0.8 to use up.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rwwff Fission


Joined: Apr 28, 2006 Posts: 2897 Location: East Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:57 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
WooHoo!! Got me a 21!
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.7
MOBILITY 4
SHELTER 4.2
GOODS/SERVICES 7.4
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 21
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.8 PLANETS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tyler_JC Moderator

![]()
Joined: Sep 25, 2004 Posts: 4526 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:46 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
I retook the test to factor in my new driving habits...and it got ugly.
I now use 44 acres (9.8 planets).
I honestly don't know why I use so much land.
Ok, I fly to visit my sister in California every now and then. And ok, I eat a lot of packaged foods (I live in Massaschusetts, it's not like we can grow anything over here). And yes, I do have a "big" house. But is 2500sq. ft. really that big?
Surely the quiz can't just end at 2,500sqft. The top third of American homes is over that limit. The quiz doesn't allow people with a 4,000sqft. house to be seperated from the 2500sqft. people.
Also, the quiz should factor in AC usage and # of children.
I consider myself a fairly green individual...but perhaps I should change the adjective... _________________ "www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jato Moderator


Joined: Aug 14, 2004 Posts: 2066 Location: San Diego, Ca.
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:20 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.9
MOBILITY 17.8
SHELTER 3.2
GOODS/SERVICES 19
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 46 _________________ "Peak oil isn't more than an interesting industry factoid and doesn't have anything to do with the hysterics speculated on ad nauseum around here!" ReserveGrowthRulz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loki Expert


Joined: Apr 08, 2006 Posts: 1079 Location: Cascadia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:48 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 4
MOBILITY 0.7
SHELTER 2.5
GOODS/SERVICES 3
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 10
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.3 PLANETS.
Cool, so all we have to do is find 1.3 more planets and I'll be set.
For a more detailed EF test, check out this spreadsheet. You can get a breakdown of every little contribution to your EF. Using this spreadsheet my EF was 11.5 acres. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tyler_JC Moderator

![]()
Joined: Sep 25, 2004 Posts: 4526 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:10 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
| jato wrote: | CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.9
MOBILITY 17.8
SHELTER 3.2
GOODS/SERVICES 19
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 46 |
Well thank God someone is worse than me. _________________ "www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gg3 Expert


Joined: May 24, 2004 Posts: 3429 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:16 pm Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
15 acres, compared to average of 24 for US.
3.4 planets.
Now if you take 6.5 billion humans and divide by 3.4 planets, you end up with 1.9 billion humans per planet-equivalent.
I've seen comparisons saying that for a European average standard of living, we would be sustainable at a population level of 2.5 billion. So these numbers are roughly convergent.
Assume powerdown slightly beyond that level, i.e. to an Eastern European average rather than Western European average, and perhaps one planet could support about 3 billion humans. (After all, people in Eastern Europe still manage to eat enough and stay clean...)
Nature's got the solution for us, in the form of a dieoff of about half the population. After that, the rest is easy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cran Tar Sands


Joined: Aug 20, 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Ununited Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:45 am Post subject: Re: Ecological Footprint Quiz |
|
|
| 3.3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|