|
|
|
News |
| |
|
Discussions |
| |
|
Resources |
| |
|
Members |
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
Support PeakOil.com Visit Our Advertisers
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
Ayoob
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:04 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 12:00 am Posts: 1312
|
|
How long until we find out what the decline rate is going to be?
When do we make a 10% decline in daily oil flow? When do we hit the first halving time?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dukey
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:42 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:00 am Posts: 2244
|
pretty big news. This from the weekly petroleum status report was also fairly big news .. Quote: Over the last four weeks, motor gasoline demand has averaged about 9.2 million barrels per day, up by 0.5 percent from the same period last year. especially considering the fact we are in a huge recession right now
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
gnm
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:28 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:00 am Posts: 3137 Location: plundering eco-villages
|
Oily? Auntie? Where are you when we need you?! -G
_________________ I Have and will continue to vote against ANY politician who supports the various bailouts. Curse you for selling out our future for status quo now!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Tyler_JC
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:27 pm |
|
 |
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:00 am Posts: 5260 Location: Boston, MA
|
What's the margin of error for yearly oil production? 1%? 2%? I don't think there's a statistically signficant difference between 73,728 and 73,709. The gap is only 19,000 barrels a day out of 73 million or .03%. Moreover, we're in the middle of a major recession which has slashed global oil demand. We can't know for sure what the real production rate would be if not for the current recession.  We had a pretty big dip in oil production in the 1980s (nearly 15% drop!) that didn't result in a permanent decline. We need more data to confirm a peak. Come talk to me in 2011-2012. I don't mean to rain on this parade, I just don't want us to make the call too early and sound like Colin Campbell. 
_________________ "www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
newman1979
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:18 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:00 am Posts: 132
|
|
2008 had oil at $147 and had every producer selling all they could produce. The result was and is that even with the price sky high and all economic theory on their side, the result was less than 2005. Maybe you should become a preacher where beliefs trump facts.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
OilFinder2
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:24 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:00 am Posts: 3823 Location: Cornucopia
|
Cyrus wrote: Oilfinder2 care to step in and try to debate this? The IEA says last year was the record, and the EIA says it was 2005. *shrugs* Call it a tie.
_________________ PO. Peak Optimism - when installed natural gas is more than sufficient to maintain installed natural gas. Plus some oil, hydropower, solar, wind, coal and nuclear thrown in for good measure!
Fun new game for peak oilers to play! It's called Follow the Prospects!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
OilFinder2
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:27 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:00 am Posts: 3823 Location: Cornucopia
|
dukey wrote: pretty big news. This from the weekly petroleum status report was also fairly big news .. Quote: Over the last four weeks, motor gasoline demand has averaged about 9.2 million barrels per day, up by 0.5 percent from the same period last year. especially considering the fact we are in a huge recession right now That was last week's report. This week the rise was 0%. Or perhaps you haven't paid attention to this thread.
_________________ PO. Peak Optimism - when installed natural gas is more than sufficient to maintain installed natural gas. Plus some oil, hydropower, solar, wind, coal and nuclear thrown in for good measure!
Fun new game for peak oilers to play! It's called Follow the Prospects!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pstarr
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:33 pm |
|
 |
| Expert |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:00 am Posts: 10083 Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
|
I wouldn't worry. We are an inventive people who rise to the occasion and use the God-Given Optimism that has made America a Great Nation, a Nation of Believers, Doers, Actors, and Achievers. Tomorrow the Sun will rise in the East as it always has done. The birds will chirp and the garage will be collected by the good, brave people that make this country the Envy of the World. I wouldn't worry  . Go out and have a Haagen Dazs. Forget about today until tomorrow. Come Dance With me on the Endless Beach of Technical Innovation in a Bright New Sunshiny day. Just where are my good friends--Oily, ShortonBrains, Antithinker?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pstarr
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:36 pm |
|
 |
| Expert |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 12:00 am Posts: 10083 Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
|
OilFinder2 wrote: dukey wrote: pretty big news. This from the weekly petroleum status report was also fairly big news .. Quote: Over the last four weeks, motor gasoline demand has averaged about 9.2 million barrels per day, up by 0.5 percent from the same period last year. especially considering the fact we are in a huge recession right now That was last week's report. This week the rise was 0%. Or perhaps you haven't paid attention to this thread. Ah. There you are. The point here I believe is that oil demand is somewhat inelastic and that in time of economic decline neither the market, nor conservation, nor efficiencies, nor replacements can stem the flow from declining reservoirs. It's almost as if we are floating in a vast toilet of petroleum with our own hands on the flusher handle. Do we yank? Or do we just enjoy the float?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
OilFinder2
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:52 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:00 am Posts: 3823 Location: Cornucopia
|
pstarr wrote: Ah. There you are. The point here I believe is that oil demand is somewhat inelastic and that in time of economic decline neither the market, nor conservation, nor efficiencies, nor replacements can stem the flow from declining reservoirs.
It's almost as if we are floating in a vast toilet of petroleum with our own hands on the flusher handle. Do we yank? Or do we just enjoy the float? It looks like you didn't click on the link. As usual. OilFinder2 wrote: SourceGasoline product suppliedFirst week of August 2006 = 9,620 thousand bpd First week of August 2007 = 9,659 thousand bpd First week of August 2008 = 9,410 thousand bpd First week of August 2009 = 9,144 thousand bpd That's almost a 5% decrease in 4 years. Some more information you've consistently ignored who-knows-how-many-times in the past couple years:   Source
_________________ PO. Peak Optimism - when installed natural gas is more than sufficient to maintain installed natural gas. Plus some oil, hydropower, solar, wind, coal and nuclear thrown in for good measure!
Fun new game for peak oilers to play! It's called Follow the Prospects!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Auntie_Cipation
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:19 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:00 am Posts: 218
|
gnm wrote: Oily? Auntie? Where are you when we need you?! -G I'm being lumped with WHO???  This is the worst news I've gotten all year. *sniff* ![crybaby2 [smilie=crybaby2.gif]](./images/smilies/crybaby2.gif) (maybe you meant Anti-Doomer?) Hey, all we can really say is that 2005 is the date so far, and that as time passes it gets less and less likely that it will be surpassed. I mean, if TPTB threw everything they had left into one final year of "suck it all up RIGHT NOW", then that year might end up as Peak, numerically. Not very likely though. I think the precise year of Peak is only significant because our human(oid) brains like to draw clean crisp lines and say "YOU ARE HERE." But reality is that from the perspective of the broader moment in time, it's NOW -- regardless of whether that means 2005 or 2010. Even if something came along that pushed the peak back by a decade or more (oh, ya know, something like a severe economic downturn, or an unsustainable-but-temporarily-profitable tar/shale extraction method), it still wouldn't change the essence of the situation. And the more we try to stave it off by fussing over symptoms, the harder we'll fall. So -- bring it on!
_________________ "... among the ways available in which a man can die, it is a rare and signal distinction to be killed by a leopard."
-- Raymond Dasmann
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
TheDude
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:58 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:00 am Posts: 4384 Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
|
OMG OF2, you figured out how to host images finally. Still picking those cherries though. Oil consumption percentage changes year to year, by region:  The decline in gasoline demand in the US is partially due to the introduction of ethanol, amounting to something like 1.2 mb/d now; plus good old garden variety demand destruction, due to the price runup and the recessiodepression, which may or may not last forever or have ended last week according to Krugman who really cares. What was your other data point...YOY, oh right. So since the economy will grow once more now, consumption will increase, and we will be right back where we started from. Or not. "Increaseless Recovery," damn, I'm on a roll.
_________________ Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi You got the wrong guy.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
AirlinePilot
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:47 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:00 am Posts: 3333 Location: South of Atlanta
|
TheDude wrote: What was your other data point...YOY, oh right. So since the economy will grow once more now, consumption will increase, and we will be right back where we started from. Or not. "Increaseless Recovery," damn, I'm on a roll. PRICELESS! 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
OilFinder2
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:03 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:00 am Posts: 3823 Location: Cornucopia
|
Here ya go TheDude, not just one, but THREE "increaseless recoveries!" France SourceItaly SourceJapan >>> Big chart of Japanese GDP growth Q12001-Q12008 <<< Source
_________________ PO. Peak Optimism - when installed natural gas is more than sufficient to maintain installed natural gas. Plus some oil, hydropower, solar, wind, coal and nuclear thrown in for good measure!
Fun new game for peak oilers to play! It's called Follow the Prospects!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
gnm
|
Post subject: Re: EIA's IPM confirms 2005 as peak production Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:19 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:00 am Posts: 3137 Location: plundering eco-villages
|
Auntie_Cipation wrote: gnm wrote: Oily? Auntie? Where are you when we need you?! -G I'm being lumped with WHO???  This is the worst news I've gotten all year. *sniff* ![crybaby2 [smilie=crybaby2.gif]](./images/smilies/crybaby2.gif) (maybe you meant Anti-Doomer?) Sorry to confuse things Auntie_Cip, But you are right - I was referring to Auntie-Doomer.... -G Oh, and I don't think it really matters whether it was 2005 or 2008 or if it will be 2010 - If you have read the Hirsch report you would know that anything less than 5 years of radical preparation (as a nation) is going to create some serious pain. So even if its 2015 we better bust ass....
_________________ I Have and will continue to vote against ANY politician who supports the various bailouts. Curse you for selling out our future for status quo now!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|