Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Forum Search
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Houston Peak Oil
 Follow on Twitter
 Members
 User Panel
 Members List
 PO Team
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
Support PeakOil.com
Visit Our Advertisers
 
Light Sweet Crude Oil
 

Net App Training
Aaron





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: UK Oil situation pretty bad
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:10 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 884
Location: Scotland
North sea - 17 (!) Percent decline for the year

Taken from the front page of peakoil but worth talking about. That is a massive 17 percent decline. That is incredible dont you guys think? I thought even the worst estimates put it at about 7-10%?

They say they can reduce the decline to 7% per year but i wouldnt hold out all that much hope unless they can find a lot of very large fields which they arent.

If this is the usual decline in these type of fields, then norway will soon be hitting a big decline too and they are a significant exporter still.

It would appear that we may well hit peak production this year given this evidence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:41 am 
Offline
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 482
Location: Holland
North Sea is around 6 million barrels per day i believe?? So you cant base peak oil on that :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:42 am 
Offline
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 1:00 am
Posts: 20
Norway is already declining. (oil)
Gas production is still going up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:18 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 884
Location: Scotland
Quote:
North Sea is around 6 million barrels per day i believe?? So you cant base peak oil on that


The thing is, the north sea was recently a fairly significant exporter of light sweet crude - surely this will have a big impact on the availability of the 'good stuff' - given that saudi has no light crude left to expand and no one else has either, except parts of africa as i understand it.

i was kind of making a wider point that previously significant oil producing areas such as the north sea are now in a very large decline and more countries are joining the importers list.

the faster than expected fall of the north sea will have an impact on the peak as it will require more oil output to make up for this loss.

Quote:
The North Sea is indeed in bad shape. esp the English half...the Norwegian half has a slower decline...but still it is in Decline. England is going to have some serious problems in the years ahead in the energy realm.


Its SCOTLAND's oil not ENGLANDS!!!! Wihout scottish oil, england would be poverty stricken... unfortunately, the dirty english have plundered our scottish oil wealth and gathered it to themselves in london. bastards!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:25 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 726
Leaf,

why is UK in the worst situation in Europe? Their population is not very much larger than it was during WWII when they managed to feed themselves. And they still have coal don't they? And a population that is very good at gardening, even if it is predominantly urban. Distances to services is usually short, so walking and bicycling are real options for most people. So why do you think that UK will have the most problems?

Nocar


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:27 am 
Offline
Fission
Fission
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:00 am
Posts: 2070
Location: UK
Leaf just doesn't like Britain...It's in no worse position than anywhere else. Although it would be a huge mistake to start airport expansion and road building at this point, we need some long term thinking.

Anyway, get your laughing gear around this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4077802.stm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:44 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 884
Location: Scotland
wow ... the bbc are really putting some weight behind the peak oil story. this is good news.

as for the UK being a bad place post peak, i cant see it being much worse than any other place. i think scotland will be better off than england though, as we do still have a lot of empty land in scotland which can be used for farming, and scotland is pretty good for renewable energy.

im mainly worried about the gas supplies at present though - i have a house running on natural gas and i NEED gas..>!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:34 am 
Offline
News Editor
News Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 4672
I suspect islands in general are likely to be bad places to be when peak oil hits. They tend to be densely populated, dependent on imports. And if something goes wrong, it's hard to move. (Though I suppose there's always the Chunnel, now.)

Did you see that article in the ASPO newsletter, called "Life After Oil"?

http://www.peakoil.ie/newsletters/521

Quote:
Today, UK population is about 60 million. In 1750, when the Industrial Revolution was beginning, it was about 6 million. It had never exceeded this figure, although during the Dark Ages and after the Black Death it fell to one or two million. Most people lived and died in poverty. Pre-industrial farmers were pushed to the limit to feed so many. The population increased slightly in years with good harvests, but starvation and malnutrition cut it back to the 6 million norm when harvests were bad.


So, to maintain the population without oil, even at a level of grinding poverty, nine out of ten UK residents has to die or move.

Quote:
Quality of life is closely related to energy consumption per capita, so to ensure a passable standard of living I must reduce the hypothetical population to only 2 million.


60 million to 2 million? Yeek.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:05 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:00 am
Posts: 969
We're hideously over-populated in England. And this is without taking into account any future immigration that doesn't look like stopping. We also have some of the highest prices anywhere in the world.

back on topic that is a huge decline, and if they propose to decrease it with more efficient drilling, that will just increase deline in the future.


"It's not Englands' it's Scotlands oil."

Yer sorry about that, we do have a history of this sort of thing.

_________________
---


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:43 am 
Offline
Expert
Expert
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:00 am
Posts: 2532
Battle_Scarred_Galactico wrote:


"It's not Englands' it's Scotlands oil."



Scotland is England's.

Without the English, the scots would be still living in African style poverty.
Mel Gibson sacked Carlise. That was about it.
England sent in the midges to test the kilt
Scotamd is useful though for goverment experiments of one kind or another The Scot elite are handsomely and historically paid off by the English to keep the tossing caberers in check and they do so admirably.
It was/is the Scots who sold out the scottish people. Criminal really but money talks

KevO

_________________
http://kevinollier.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:47 am 
Offline
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 903
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU
Leaf, why should UK feed itself??? It will import food as much as it does today, from countries, that are more favourable for growing it..
Whole agriculture/transport industry is consuming only miniscule part of oil, most is personal transportation. There is nothing that will stop food transports. Besides, food was being transported around en masse even in the very beginning of 20th century, market was globalized even back then before oil (two world wars put a stop on globalization process).

Imo you are living in one of the worst countries post peak - Ukraine, countries with fragile goverments and dependance on energy-intensive heavy industry wont do all right imo..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:53 am 
Offline
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 1180
Location: England
That's it leaf you have convinced me ! We are all gonna die!!! :roll:

_________________
Peak Oil? Shit Happens !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
New postPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:56 am 
Offline
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:00 am
Posts: 37
Location: Haggerston, London
Taskforce_Unity wrote:
North Sea is around 6 million barrels per day i believe?? So you cant base peak oil on that :P


UK production - 1.9M bpd.
Norway - 3.3M bpd.

Oil Production Figures

The reason for the dramatic decline is modern technology. You see, technology is "saving" us!

London Bastard.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bravo91, Velociryx, Voyager [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Atom News Feed   Forums RSS Feed