Only a fraction of how criminalizing free speech fires me up.

There are limits to everything. I'm sure I'ld be done for sedition were I to mouth off willy nilly.

Some of my South African Afrikaner relatives served in Hitler's forces (much to my enduring shame) during WWII (many Afrikaners sided with Hitler in a revolt against the British) and it is fairly common knowledge even now what Hitler was up to.

I once met an old British serviceman who had liberated a Nazi death camp and he saw the gas chambers first hand. I also met a camp survivor who had lost his family and was tatooed with a number.

I have no doubt that denialism is mischief bordering on sedition and should be thus judged just as I would be were I to go off at a tangent.

Now, with due regard to Pops, this discussion is over for me.

So there it is, plain as yogurt. You think that a person who disagrees with the government's story of [pick official bunk] is committing a crime against the country.

Like I said - your view is quite simple - "Live and let live, according to me."