Quote:
I wouldn't say that electric cars are the next muscle cars just yet. Electric powered vehicles have proven that they can go fast but we're still waiting for a economy version that everyone can use on a daily basis. We need something with more than just a bare bones race type of ev to go fast. Something like a 4 door sedan that is relatively sporty, practical for everyday use, cheap enough to afford, and offer good performance.
There's AC Propulsion's all-electric Honda Civic they built in the mid 1990s.
On lead acid batteries, 100 miles highway range, 0-60 mph in 6.2 seconds, 4-doors, air conditioning, heating, and all that, and in volume of 10,000 cars per year, it would only cost $20,000 sold at a profit. Hand made, it's $75,000. This was about 10 years ago. No major auto maker touched it. Porsche Boxter acceleration for Honda Civic money.
It's unfortunate that AC Propulsion lacks mass production capability.
Quote:
The only way so far to make a cheap EV, is using lead acid battery technology.
This is true, but not necessarily due to the costs of other cehmistries themselves. Who owns the patents and also production volume and the fact that the major auto makers refuse to touch EVs are the major factors. not the technology itself.
Quote:
While it offers good amp draw with hawker, optima, exide and other top notch battery suppliers, it lacks enough capacity. I realize that not everyone drives more than 50 miles a day, but it would be more marketable if you only had to charge it once a week or so.
Those lead acid batteries can give a car 100 miles range with careful attention to aerodynamics. That's certainly marketable to many. The Wall Street Journal reported that the market for an affordable electric powered car that had at least 50 miles range was about 150,000 sales per year for the state of California alone.
Quote:
Remember most of these owners of EV's are going to be those in Suburbia, not in the city, mostly because in the city you don't have many places to plug in. So if your driving from and to work from suburbia you will be using a large amount of your range. After a days commute and assuming you can't recharge at work you will have used most of your range and its time to go home to recharge in suburbia.
Personally, I'd like suburbia to go the way of the dinosaurs.
But, it wouldn't be that difficult to set up electric vehicle charging infrastructure, either. Look at what we spent in Iraq.
Quote:
Other battery technologies are available like nicad,nimh,nizn,li-ion,li-polymer,zinc air, but these are much more expensive and will add significant costs to the vehicles.
True, if the battery packs and batteries themselves are hand-assembled!
AC Propulsion quotes Lithium Ion in mass production for automotive application at $250/kWh. That would be a 30 kWh $7,500 pack that would last 200,000+ miles in life and give 150-200 miles range.
Stemple, ECD chairman quoted NiMH in volume for 20,000 cars per year at $150/kWh. A 30 kWh pack to give a car 150-200 miles range would cost $4,500 and last in excess of 250,000 miles with abuse, however, if cared for, in excess of 300,000 miles. 1,750 discharge cycles to 100%. BUT, Chevron Texaco bought the patent, refuses to offer the batteries for an affordable price, and charges thousands of dollars per kWh, hence the multi-thousand dollar price premiums on the hybrids that use them.
Quote:
Lithium polymer would at this point in time, be the best option to go with as it has demonstrated it is safer than regular li-ion and that it can be shaped to fit in many different positions within a vehicle.
Positions don't matter so much. An engine block and all its ancillary components didn't need to be moldable, neither does a battery pack. What's neat about the batteries is, you can build the entire pack into the floor of the car for a center of gravity that anchors it to the ground.
Quote:
The most marketable vehicle for an EV at this point in time would then be a sporty 4 door sedan type of vehicle, lithium battery powered, and some sort of 230 KW + drive train, and 4 wheel drive and lightweight. This is where the market for cars is today.
230 kW is very sexy to someone like myself, but for a mass market EV, overkill. A 170 horsepower EV that weighs 3,200 pounds would have no problem doing 0-60 mph in the mid 6 second range and 1/4 mile in high 14 seconds range, on par with the new Mitsubishi Eclipse GT. Electric motors make peak torque at 0 rpm, and as a general rule, for acceleration performance, one electric horsepower will be worth about 1.3 gas car horsepower.
230 kW, or 310 horsepower, would take a 4,000 pound EV from 0-60 in under 5 seconds. That would knock the rest of the auto undustry off its feet would someone be both willing and capable of mass producing a car like that. The small businesses are willing but not capable, the big automakers are capable but not willing. Unfortunate, as the beginning of peak oil will cause 70s-era anemia in our cars all over again, perhaps eliminating them altogether in the long run.
Quote:
Marketing for electric vehicles has also been almost non-existent,
Ever wonder why? It was non-existent even when they were being offered for lease, yet every one made was successfully leased simply by word of mouth alone. Yet the industry tries to claim they weren't a success, how they only 'sold'(ie. leased and later crushed) a few hundred cars, when they only made that same number of cars to begin with.
Quote:
and their image has not changed over time either.
Sadly. A lot of that is in our media.
Quote:
If you want to sell electric cars you have to take away their dork factor and replace it with the cool factor.
That's one reason I'm building an electric sports car instead of an econobox.
Once that fucker is on the road, I'm going to race it, terrorize my neighborhood with it, and scare the hell out of other motorists.
Quote:
You also have to figure out a way to setup charging stations in homeowners garages so their electric cars can take less time to recharge, this could be offered by the automotive manufacturer with a 240 volt 20 amp setup to cut recharging times by more than half of a typical 120 volt 15 amp outlet.
This is hardly an issue. More pressing is the need for fast-charging infrastructure in public places, 480+ volts and over 200 amps, to get you 200 or more miles range with 30 minutes of charging, to make long distance travel possible with EVs.
Quote:
Just a bunch of fools expecting our overloaded electrical grid to supply their future cars with juice.
FAT CHANCE! violent5
The grid is nearly beyond hope now and there was almost a huge blackout in 2005 due to just airconditioners. I'm sure if we added a million cars to that it would go down every day.
The grid is in trouble during on peak demand, but most of the time, people would be charging at night during off peak, when up to 50% of grid capacity is available. Our grid could handle over 100 million cars charging during off-peak demand. Even if we don't have electric cars, our grid will be in big trouble in the future. We need to cut electricity consumption with more efficient appliances and install more wind farms.
If all of America's cars were to be switched to electric, we'd only see about a 15-20% increase in nationwide electricity consumption.