I think this is the beginnings of an economy based on perpetual growth and fossil fuel energy running headlong into geological energy constraints. Basically I see an undulatory downward path for the rest of my life. From here out, I think any rallies in our economic condition are going to be met with spiking commodity prices that knock us right back down.
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:48 pm Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
Would 5 gallons even be enough to set yourself on fire so you wouldn't have to live in a world without cheap gasoline? _________________ In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Nietzsche
Time makes more converts than reason. – Thomas Paine
History is a set of lies agreed upon. – Napoleon Bonaparte
Joined: May 06, 2006 Posts: 873 Location: Tustin, CA
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
Drifter wrote:
Anyone here actually believe that the US can properly function on 5 gallon per household per month gasoline rationing? I don't. No way.
I don’t think so either, but China with almost a billon people when Richard Nixon first went there in 1972 probably used less than that. Of course it will probably look like this.
Still time to get that extra Bicycle or two (and of course extra tires too!) before they become status symbols! _________________ Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:39 pm Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
Drifter wrote:
The author of this article conveniently forgot to mention that most people wouldn't be able to get to work on 5 gallon per month rationing. Oh well. Just a small detail.
Well, consider that an average month has 21 working days and if you got a 100 miles per gallon scooter, you could in theory live about 12 miles one way fomr work and use your allotment of 5 gallons commuting.
Joined: May 06, 2006 Posts: 873 Location: Tustin, CA
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
Drifter wrote:
I understand what you are saying, SILENTTODD. I don't even own a car or drive. But as you know, millions of Americans live 30+ miles from work. No way they can commute by bicycle 60+ miles round trip everyday. Hell, I don't know if anyone could do that.
Maybe most of those people who commute could move closer to work? But then that would equal a lot of empty suburban homes.
I think that is exactly what is going to happen as this unfolds, and in ways I think nobody has even imagined yet. But the bottom line is, you can't stay where you can't make a living.
The far west of the United States is full of places that lost their economic reason for existing. Below is an interesting site that tells the stories of a number of the them in Nevada, Arizona, California, and New Mexico.
Granted, virtually all of these had to do with mining in the 19th century. But they are a small scale analogy with what will go on in many places, particularly the western United States where there is no abundance of water. Without water, never mind no fuel, you definitely cannot live there, at least not in the numbers that do now. _________________ Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
Last edited by SILENTTODD on Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
This is why Robert Hirsch says we need 20 years to prepare for oil peaking. In 20 years we could pretty easily get down to 5 gal/month. If we had 20 years in which we still had reasonable supplies of oil, we could easily move to a electric train / electric bus / electric car / electric motorcycle / electric scooter / electric bike / regular bike transportation system. Heck, we could carpool: 5 gal/month is 20 gal for four people. In a 30mpg car they could do 15 miles each way for 20 days a month.
We need that 20 years to build housing and jobs close together. That will require diesel construction equipment. We don't have electric versions of those yet, and we would need them to build the housing infrastructure. Without 20 years of smooth prep, you get a chicken/egg dilemma where you can't easily get to a low-oil system.
Of course, a severe enough recession would also get us down to 5 gallons per month, but I agree with everyone else that it would be extremely ugly. That's what the author means when he talks about the "World Made By Hand" alternative. We may know in a few years.
Joined: Apr 06, 2006 Posts: 3618 Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:17 am Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
An immediate concern is how to put a stop to fuel thievery. At $450/gal you'd see hijacking of most anything, as it is we're seeing massive heists here and there. But then many are saying $250/bbl is a ceiling for the economy to function in the first place.
Drifter wrote:
But as you know, millions of Americans live 30+ miles from work. No way they can commute by bicycle 60+ miles round trip everyday. Hell, I don't know if anyone could do that.
I'm sure it's possible. Some real hardcore types out there. Flagstaff Biking Organization has a couple members doing 55 milers, for instance.
But his article mostly focuses on super-high mileage cars, electric bikes, scooters; and doesn't get into MT. I see jitney bus systems being thrown together using school buses. Not much of a stretch there.
I'd like to see the big automakers get into building these scooters and the like. But my feeling is that there just won't be enough time for businesses to weather the storm of such a transition. _________________ Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
The Dude Is Not In: Leave A Message After The Beep.
Joined: Sep 25, 2005 Posts: 2050 Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:07 am Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
Ayoob wrote:
I'm opposed to rationing, though. Just let the price float and let everybody buy as much as they can. That's the only fair way.
How do you define fair? If I earn, say, $100,000 per year, I'd be able to afford a lot more than someone on $20,000 per year, or less.
In what way is that fair?
Rationing may be difficult to operate but, if it could be operated properly, it would be fair, it would guarantee the total amount used and it would probably keep prices low. The only downside is that it would probably disincentivize oil companies from trying harder. However, eventually, even at 2.2 million barrels per day, the oil would start to decline, so it's really all about changing society utterly, not about living for ever on 5 gallons a month.
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:49 am Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
Of course if we want to eat , our five gallons per month will have to go towards plowing, discing, planting, fertilizing, spraying, irrigating, harvesting, storing, trucking, processing and trucking again.
Joined: Sep 29, 2004 Posts: 2330 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:02 am Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
I think it's funny when I see people talking about $450/bl oil and then offering up futuristic cars. With oil that high, the economy as we know it will no longer exist. The highways will empty out, being used only for priority vehicles. Automobile manufacturing of any kind will be dead. In fact, most consumer manufacturing will be dead and there is a reason for this.
Right now there is a world wide glut of manufacturing. There are too many products chasing too few consumers. There are so many used products laying around, that if manufacturing were to stop, we could have (and will have) an economy based on products already in existence. We currently live in a throw away society. When something no longer pleases us, we throw it aside and buy something new and sexy. We don't buy things out of need, we buy most things because we want something new.
At $450/bl oil, the economy as we know it will stop, replaced by the economy of necessity. This new economy will see the revival of a long dead profession; the Maytag repairman. The population of most countries will start to contract because the less advantaged members will begin to die off due to sickness and starvation. As the population reduces, there simply will be little need to make more furniture, home electronics, appliances, automobiles, etc. Instead of junking used stuff, it will all be recycled into the new economy based on buying, selling and repairing these valuable items. Stores will look like pawn shops because that's essentially what they will become.
Think about it. A 1950's Schwinn bicycle can be made to last for a thousand years with periodic maintenance. Why do we need to throw them out and start over? The same is true of most everything. In fact, IMO, the coveted products will be those that are simple, easy to fix and maintain. I expect small local factories to pop up who specialize in rebuilding products. Our future is a future of endless recycling, just like it was before oil. The only new manufacturing going on will be replacement parts, in the bicycle's case; tires. These parts will be expensive, but will be absolutely needed, so they will be made. _________________ "That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:20 am Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
You mentioned the 1950s Schwinn bicycle...
Can you imagine what treasures our local dumps possess? When things get down and dirty, I'm confident that the more capable souls will find a veritable no-cost department store buried just below the soil at the town dump.
Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Posts: 157 Location: Land of the Tonkawa/Karankawa
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: Re: I guess he forgot about economic collapse
Kingcoal wrote:
A 1950's Schwinn bicycle can be made to last for a thousand years with periodic maintenance. ... The only new manufacturing going on will be replacement parts, in the bicycle's case; tires. These parts will be expensive, but will be absolutely needed, so they will be made.
Not quite.
The whole bicycle would have to be essentially replaced about every 150 years if it were kept in MUSEUM conditions.
If it were actually ridden GINGERLY ... then the chain would have to be replaced once every 5-10 years, along with the front and rear cog. You'd have a flat tire once a year if you were the luckiest little bicycle riding leprechaun, and therefore would need tubes. The paint would crack and flake due to exposure, allowing moisture to slowly get into the frame and rust the metal. Indeed you could treat it with petroleum products to repel the moisture, periodically repaint, etc... but it would eventually rust out. The handlebar grips will break after 15 years. The handlebars will eventually fatigue on you. The pedals will need to be replaced every 20 years if you're willing to ride them down until the pedal platform cracks off and you're riding on the central metal spindle for a while, with your foot continually slipping off every time you hit a big bump. The bearing assemblies (cranks, headset, wheel hubs) will need their ball bearings replaced every 5-10 years.
And heaven help you if you crash the bike.
Nope. I don't see a Schwinn cruiser lasting a thousand years, let alone 30 without far, far, far more than "periodic maintenance". _________________ Collapse-prep Intentional Community forming outside of Austin, TX. PM me if interested.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum