| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MrBill Expert


Joined: Sep 15, 2005 Posts: 5646 Location: Eurasia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:43 pm Post subject: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
is it moral to thrive when others are struggling to survive? _________________ The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grifter Intermediate Crude


Joined: Mar 29, 2006 Posts: 876 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:45 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
I'm not really sure about the philosophy of morality but yes we do it already. We thrive while others suffer. We have done for a long time.
I have no moral issue with trying to do well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrBill Expert


Joined: Sep 15, 2005 Posts: 5646 Location: Eurasia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:53 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
that's honest. I am poorer then the children of cypriots that inherited land and then sold out like buy at $100.000 and sell at $4 million in, umm, 20-years? Right place at right time, but it would be a mistake not to fleece them for every penny that 'they' did not earn. Or am I simply evil? If so, do I get a mini-me? _________________ The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigTex Moderator


Joined: Aug 03, 2006 Posts: 4331 Location: Graceland
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:55 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
I think the best answer is balance.
I always ask myself what would be fair for me to expect someone else to do for me if I needed help.
If I were struggling to survive, I think it would be fair for me to expect someone who was thriving to provide some type of assistance to me. Thus, when I am thriving I am happy to help someone who is struggling to survive, to the extent that I think it will actually help them. For example, feeding a hungry person may not be of much help long term and may actually aggravate the problem. OTOH, if I have the opportunity to help them learn to provide for themselves, then I will help them for the reasons outlined above. (I reached this conclusion, in part, after buying many hamburgers for homeless people outside fast food places and being asked why I didn't get them fries.)
To the extent that morality rests, in part, on notions of fairness and the golden rule, I think that striking this kind of balance is moral.
There is no good answer, but I think the best answer is somewhere between doing nothing and giving everything the poor. The problem I have with giving everything to the poor is that I can only do it once, then I am just another one of the poor, and I can't help the poor any further at that point. If I help the poor while maintaining my own ability to thrive, then I can continue to provide assistance to others. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
killJOY Fission


Joined: Feb 21, 2005 Posts: 2510 Location: ^NNE^
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:03 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
it doesn't matter.
everything is to be swallowed by eternity.
who's to witness your "morality"? who cares about it, but you?
remember kafka's hunger artist:
| Quote: | | I've always wanted you to admire my fasting. |
_________________ "By the time individuals discover that remaining resources will not be adequate for the next generation, the next generation has already been born. " David Price |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TT Heavy Crude


Joined: Sep 12, 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
Would it be more moral to not strive to survive as best as you can?
Do we not each have an obligation to do our best in our given situation.? Altough we can offer the hand of kindness to those in need, we should not risk our own continued survival. Survival is not morality, it is what we must do as a life form. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
catbox Heavy Crude


Joined: Sep 29, 2005 Posts: 456 Location: I heard we are not the real America..Eugene, Oregon.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
I don't really know anyone who is thriving aside from the two guys who own the business I work for. Everyone else is just surviving.
Do some of us have it "better" than others? Yup! While not rich or even middle class anymore...I still manage to live better than many people I see around me due to the choices I've made.
For that I feel no guilt. At the same time, I give where I can. _________________ Punk is not really a style of music. It was more like a state of mind.
-Mike Watt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrBill Expert


Joined: Sep 15, 2005 Posts: 5646 Location: Eurasia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:23 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
Remember even if you have 'nothing' you may be better off than your neighbors in 'negative equity', but if they would have been lucky or correct perhaps they would be much richer than you? _________________ The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mkwin Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 01, 2007 Posts: 624
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
| Morality only comes into making money if you are earning it in a dishonest way. Killing people, hurting people or ripping people off is immoral not making money. If you do any of these things to make money it is immoral. If you make even a trillion dollars in an honest way there is nothing wrong with that. However, if you become rich, I believe you have a moral obligation to give to charity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grifter Intermediate Crude


Joined: Mar 29, 2006 Posts: 876 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
| mkwin wrote: | | Morality only comes into making money if you are earning it in a dishonest way. Killing people, hurting people or ripping people off is immoral not making money. If you do any of these things to make money it is immoral. If you make even a trillion dollars in an honest way there is nothing wrong with that. However, if you become rich, I believe you have a moral obligation to give to charity. |
But in a free society an individual can become more powerful than the elected leader.
Is that morally...erm....right?
I really do think that morality is simply your own ability to live with yourself for the deeds you do.
To me, having a trillion dollars and keeping it is morally repugnant but I would still buy that trillionaire a pint and have a civilized converation with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrBill Expert


Joined: Sep 15, 2005 Posts: 5646 Location: Eurasia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
The richest men - Buffets and Gates - seem keen to share it in a community friendly way? Like Rotary Club International where we cooperate with the Gate's Foundation to eradicate polio worldwide, forever! ; - ) _________________ The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wisconsin_cur Moderator


Joined: May 10, 2007 Posts: 3217
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:59 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
Mr Bill,
1) why are you still awake?
2) I think the question is misdirected.
A) To a large extent I am unable to effect the situation of "others." There always will be those who are just working to survive so the question becomes, "Is it moral to thrive?" Which begs the question what does it mean to thrive?
B) We can control how we "thrive" do we do it at the expense of others? Do we do it in a moral way? How we react to our circumstances is something we can control. I could have made a living selling people mortgages that I knew they could not repay. That would be wrong. Instead I work in health care. In some ways it is still a racket but I act in my position according to my conscience. It is concievable that this could get me fired. If it does, so be it. I will find another moral way to put bread on the table.
C) The question I find most intriguing is how we define "thrive." What is the good life? Of what does it consist? When we come to a good answer to these questions I think we will find very little that promotes thriving that puts others at risk or negatively effects their desire to survive.
peace,
courage,
joy
cur _________________ “It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him.”
J.R.R. Tolkien |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fishman Intermediate Crude


Joined: Aug 11, 2005 Posts: 819 Location: Eastern NC
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:21 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
| Optimally your thriving should help others to survive and struggle less. A good capitalist does just this. A bad one does not. (Good as defined as being aware that your decisions affect others) What one must not do when helping others is placing them at moral hazard, your help should not assist them in making further bad decisions ie like the Democrats welfare system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seldom_seen Fission


Joined: Apr 12, 2005 Posts: 2040
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:26 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
| MrBill wrote: | | The richest men - Buffets and Gates - seem keen to share it in a community friendly way? |
The massive donations from folks like Buffet and Gates remind me of the potlach ceremonies of the NW coast indians. They had such an economy of abundance that tribes would gather together and try to give each other as much stuff as possible. "Between rival groups the potlach could involve extravagant or competitive giving and destruction by the host of valued items as a display of superior wealth."
I think the message behind their giving is "Look how fcking rich I am! I can just give this crap away."
For instance if the Gates foundation by some fluke actually cured malaria in Africa. The population would explode further, leading to a more degraded, wretched and miserable existence for it's inhabitants. With more and more Rwandas and Kenyas.
There is very little critical thought put in to their charity efforts. It appears to be a narcissistic pissing match between rich people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mkwin Intermediate Crude


Joined: Jun 01, 2007 Posts: 624
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: Re: is it moral to survive? |
|
|
Even Rockefeller gave away over 500 million of his fortune and as Mr Bill said, many very rich people give vast amounts of money to good causes. Rich people do not create poverty they generate wealth and society as a whole benefits from the spillover benefits in the form of employment, tax and products.
| Quote: | | But in a free society an individual can become more powerful than the elected leader. |
Money can influence political power with money but it cannot overtake it in most democratic countries because the rule of law and democratic institutions mean power is controlled by statute and decentralized. Rich people influencing politics, however, is possibly immoral but that was not the question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|