Peak Oil News

 

 
Menu
 News
 Search
 Topics
 Stories Archive
 Submit News
 Discussions
 Code of Conduct
 Forums
 Last 24 Hours
 PO 24hrs
 Peak Blog
 Ask Jane
 Resources
 About Us
 Downloads
 Web Links
 PeakWiki
 PeakPortal
 Focus Search
 Peak TV
 Peak Oil Boston
 Follow on Twitter
 Members
 User Panel
 Members List
 PO Team
 JOIN!
 Private Messages
 
PeakSpeak
NICKNAME

Download TeamSpeak
What is PeakSpeak?
Peak Oil on IRC
 
Member Quotes
Abiotic oil debunking is a regular thing around here. New members who have not done their homework bring it up as a solution to the worlds problems. Posting a reply uses more energy than will ever be generated by such a thing.

kpeavey

Suggest Quote

 
Photo Album
Submit Photo
Peakoil.com is You!


member photos
 
Links

Net App Training
Aaron
 
Trying to Make Nuclear Power Less Risky
Hydrocarbon AlternativesThorium is a slightly radioactive element, a cousin of uranium. For the past four decades, in fits and starts, researchers have been testing it as a potentially attractive competitor to uranium as a source of nuclear fuel. Within the nuclear community, it's won a small, devoted following. Up to now, it's had little commercial impact.

Today, however, thorium is getting a serious second look from some powerful global players.

With interest in nuclear power soaring, thorium is being re-examined as a potential solution to—or at least a palliative for—some of the industry's daunting problems, particularly the production of hazardous radioactive waste. Advocates say that adding thorium to a nuclear reaction would help reduce the volume of nuclear waste that is produced and help prevent civilian nuclear fuels from being converted into weapons-grade material.

With nearly three dozen nuclear reactors under construction worldwide and at least 50 more in the planning stages, world leaders are facing mounting pressure to ensure that any nuclear expansion occurs as safely and cleanly as possible.

So, could thorium, which is found in the sandy beaches of India, Australia, and the United States, be part of the answer? Some politicians certainly hope so. So do many foreign governments. In the United States last fall, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch introduced a bill requesting $250 million for thorium research and development. Abroad, the Indian government is banking on thorium-run nuclear plants to meet its growing energy needs. Russia, France, the United Arab Emirates, and others also have expressed interest.

Of course, there's at least one big catch: At the moment, thorium isn't ready for wide commercial use. But on paper and in laboratory tests, it looks like a sleek upgrade from uranium. It's consumed much less quickly in a reaction, so it has the potential to slice in half the volume of waste that's produced. And unlike uranium, it doesn't produce plutonium that can be used in weapons. This could help allay fears, particularly in Washington, that developing countries might use civilian nuclear energy programs as a pretext for developing nuclear weapons.

US News

Posted on Thursday, March 26 @ 08:29:53 PDT by waegari
 
Related Links
· More about Hydrocarbon Alternatives
· News by waegari


Most read story about Hydrocarbon Alternatives:
You can close the site now, energy problems are solved.

 
Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad

 
Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 
"Trying to Make Nuclear Power Less Risky" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register