Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on July 11, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Global oil exploration nears $1 trillion – where are the finds?

Geology

* New oilfield development drop to lowest since 1999

* Global reserve replacement ratio falls steeply

* Enhanced oil recovery from mature field is partial solution

Two years ago Total (NYSE: TOTnews) ‘s chief Christophe de Margerie launched a “high risk, high reward” oil exploration strategy, betting he could hit a bonanza, even though his rivals had failed to make big discoveries.

But Total risks joining the industry trend of making only smaller and fewer finds, despite global investments in oil exploration heading to a record $1 trillion by 2017.

This week, Margerie told Reuters he gives himself until the year-end to find a major deposit or cut the exploration budget next year following several disappointing drilling campaigns.

Top players are struggling to find enough conventional oil. Majors are caught between growing pressure from investors to cut spending and boost profits and the increasingly costly need to replace declining onshore and offshore reserves.

“Over the last 10 years the rate of return from exploration has diminished with time,” said Andrew Lodge, exploration director at London-listed explorer Premier Oil (LSE: PMO.Lnews) .

“In the heyday of 2001-2002 the average rate of return for the industry was 20 percent … that dropped last year to around 10 percent,” he said.

Disappointing exploration campaigns no longer make such big headlines as they were 10 years ago amid the “peak oil” debate.

That theory of oil as a diminishing resource has been transformed by the U.S. shale oil revolution. Speedy growth from North American unconventional oil reserves has helped stabilise oil prices, despite major supply outages.

As a long-standing U.S. ban on crude oil exports remains in place, however, the industry still hugely relies on conventional mega-projects, such as those off the coast of Angola or Brazil, which progress along generally predictable time frames and produce stable volumes for years.

The shale oil industry is more complicated and is still in its infancy, which makes it incredibly difficult to anticipate new oil coming onto the market.

TRILLION DOLLARS

New conventional discoveries in recent years have disappointed in size and only a handful, such as Statoil (Xetra: 675213news) ‘s Johan Sverdrop oilfield in the North Sea, have emulated the mega fields discovered more than 50 years.

“Today we consume 33 billion barrels of oil per year and are discovering 10-20 billion barrels at most. It appears that the biggest single oil discovery in 2013 was less than 1 billion barrels in size,” asset management firm Investec (LSE: INVP.Lnews) said in a report.

Despite a tight capital diet, oil companies are set to spend a record $1 trillion to explore for new reserves by 2017, according to Barclays (LSE: BARC.Lnews) .

Exploration and production spending has risen four-fold since 2000 to around $700 billion because of a rise in material and services prices, which in turn were driven to a large extent by a steep increase in global oil prices and inflation rates.

In 2014, ExxonMobil will spend the most on E&P among the oil majors at $35.3 billion dollars, followed by Chevron at $34.6 billion. PetroChina (HKSE: 0857-OL.HKnews) has the largest E&P budget for 2014 at $39.6 billion, according to Barclays data.

“Majors have increased exploration budget by 3 to 5 times in recent years but they have been very ineffective,” said Investec’s Charles Whall. “The oil companies are a little complacent”.

Oil discoveries peaked in the 1960s when around 400,000 billion barrels were discovered.

In a measure of the success of drilling project, the number of new oilfield developments is set to drop below 50 per year in 2014 and 2015, compared with an average of 75 per year over the past decade, according to Nicholas Green, analyst at London-based Bernstein Research.

“This represents the lowest level of activity since 1999, lower even than the oil price crash of 2008-09,” he said.

The declining rate of finds is now discouraging investment in certain areas, with drilling in the North Sea set to decline the most over the next two years. Southeast Asia is likely to be the only region to see increased activity, according to Green.

The complexity of “frontier exploration” such as the Arctic and the pre-salt deep waters of Brazil and West Africa has cut returns on investments.

Some hope the answer to poor exploration results can be found in increased recovery rates from mature conventional fields.

Oil recovery averaged around 35 percent for decades but technological advances such as computer geological modelling and the use of new chemicals have increased the recovery to over 50 percent, according to Matthias Bichsel, Shell (LSE: RDSB.Lnews) director of projects and technology.

“I believe in further breakthroughs in enhanced oil recovery. That’s what we will see – injecting chemicals to simply get more oil out of the ground,” Bichsel told Reuters.

“The best way is to make the most out of what you have.”

Reuters



7 Comments on "Global oil exploration nears $1 trillion – where are the finds?"

  1. Newfie on Fri, 11th Jul 2014 10:14 am 

    Industrial Civilization is unsustainable.

  2. rockman on Fri, 11th Jul 2014 11:00 am 

    The primary goal of public oil companies isn’t to make investments that increase global energy supplies. It’s done to at least stabilize if not increase stock value. The primary goal of my private company isn’t to increase global energy supplies…it’s to create an acceptable rate of return. Which is why after spending $200+ million drilling for NG during first three years of existence we haven’t spent $1 drilling for NG the last two years since prices fell.

    The oil patch ain’t your momma. We aren’t now and never have been responsible for supplying the world with its energy needs. Nothing personal…just business. LOL.

  3. Northwest Resident on Fri, 11th Jul 2014 11:25 am 

    The oil patch definitely ain’t MY momma. And thank God for that. I’m bad enough as it is. Can you imagine if I had been raised by the oil patch!!

    But rockman makes a great point. The oil business is in business to make money, and lots of it. For a long time, the imperative to make money in the oil business translated directly into supplying oil to you and me all the others who need that energy to do what we do.

    That is no longer true. These days, for an oil company to “make money”, it may need to supply a little more oil for us consumers to burn, or given the fact that providing oil for consumers to burn may end up LOSING money, the oil companies might just need to do something else to make money which does not necessarily include providing more oil for the masses to burn.

    Anybody else see a potential problem here?

  4. rockman on Fri, 11th Jul 2014 11:41 am 

    It’s not like the isn’t a very well documented history of increased capex expenditures not delivering a proportion increase in production. Using the rig count as a surrogate for capex: in the 70’s the US rig count increased from 1,000 to the max of 4,500. And the result: US oil production merely plateaued to a very slight increase. So the current bump in expenditures have actually had a more positive response. But the response has been primarily from high decline rate wells compared to the lower decline rates of the conventional reservoirs developed in the late 70’s.

  5. bobinget on Fri, 11th Jul 2014 11:52 am 

    Oregon and Washington despite plenty of shale are not ‘blessed’ with commercial quantities of oil or gas. This is why I giggle at BUMPER Strips imploring us to “Ban Fracking”.
    My home town banned nuclear weapons some years back, so far so good.
    Last month we banned GMO planting in the entire county. What could go wrong?

    What jumps up and bites a person reading above article?
    “Today we consume 33 billion barrels of oil per year and are discovering 10-20 billion barrels”

    It appears banning “tar” sands product in Southern Oregon should be next on our ballot.

  6. Nony on Fri, 11th Jul 2014 1:39 pm 

    E&P sounds like it is more than just exploration. Like to see straight exploration budgets. (Probably more dramatic decrease than E&P). Also, would be good to see some estimate of what is going on at smaller players. Are they exploring and the majors not? Like pharma where more and more drug discovery is at biotechs and then the big pharma buys them and does marketing and scale up.

  7. Makati1 on Fri, 11th Jul 2014 9:33 pm 

    Seems we keep bouncing up against limits of some sort. Profits being the limit we are seeing most these days. Especially in the energy field.
    How many of the big companies are only existing on their less expensive, old, conventional fields?

    It’s obvious that oil prices have hit the wall, so to speak and little room is left for raising them without triggering a world depression and loss of demand.