Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 25, 2012

Bookmark and Share

South Invited to ‘De-Grow’

General Ideas

“We should find the way, with our small degrowth movement in the global North, to align ourselves with the environmental justice movement originating with indigenous peoples from the South,” Catalan ecological economist Juan Martinez-Alier said at the third international degrowth conference in Venice, Italy.

Degrowth is popular concept particularly in France, Italy and Spain, and is slowly gathering fans in other parts of Europe and North America. It argues that a democratic collective decision to consume and produce less in the global North is the most appropriate solution for the multiple crises facing the world today.

Renouncing economic growth in the North, say the proponents, would not only allow humanity to stay within the ecological limits of the planet but also contribute to restoring global social justice.

In practice, degrowth is compatible with grassroots projects such as food cooperatives, urban gardening, local currencies, co-housing projects, waste reduction and reuse initiatives, or the ‘transition towns’ idea originating in the UK. It allows for cooperation with local, regional and even national authorities, albeit not heavily relying on governmental measures, and it is anti-corporate.

The third international degrowth conference that took place Sep. 19-23 in Venice in Italy brought together about 600 activists and intellectuals to discuss issues as varied as food sovereignty, the energy transition, a minimum guaranteed income, the debt crisis, and participative politics. Among these, one of the most visible themes this year has been the increased attention paid to solutions to the global crises stemming from the global South and their compatibility with the degrowth vision.

Martinez-Alier was speaking about the need for convergence between degrowth and environmental justice movements in the global South following a showing of the movie Yasuni ITT: El Buen Vivir which depicts struggles around the exploration of oil resources in the Yasuni biosphere in the Ecuadorian Amazon, threatening the lifestyles and even lives of indigenous peoples there, the kichwas and the waoranis.

According to the ecological economist, degrowth activists working towards radically reducing consumption in the global North should align their struggle with that of social movements fighting against extractive projects in Latin America: for one, reducing consumption in the North would diminish demand for those natural resources mined for in the Amazon and other pristine natural areas; for another, indigenous victories to preserve homelands intact also mean less pollution from mining and big infrastructure projects and less of a push in the direction of disastrous climate change.

According to Colombian anthropologist Arturo Escobar, degrowth offers answers about how the global North can act to tackle the global crises, but – being created by the global North for the North – it has, and should have, little to say about how the global South should move ahead. Instead, what degrowth activists and researchers can do is create a “significant conversation with the global South” and work together with activists and intellectuals from there “to see from the perspective of Southern social movements.”

Escobar explained that the most promising directions of change in the South are coming from some social movements in Latin America, primarily indigenous, black and peasant movements.

According to the anthropologist, the Latin American continent is at the moment experiencing three types of societal change projects. One model is “conventional modernisation”, that is, a promotion of neo-liberal pro-globalisation policies in Mexico and Colombia, which, according to Escobar, “are by no coincidence the closest allies of the U.S. in the region and have the highest degree of violence and political control.”

Secondly, most countries in the region (Venezuela, Bolivia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile under former president Michelle Bachelet, Paraguay under former president Fernando Lugo, Uruguay) experience what is seen as an “enlightened development model” of leftist regimes which continue to pursue pro-growth traditional development agendas but pay special attention to tackling poverty and inequality and even succeed in these tasks. Nevertheless, the traditional development approach translates into the intensive exploitation of natural resources in order to generate income, with negative consequences on nature and indigenous populations living there as well as on climate.

The third Latin American change project, in Escobar’s classification, stems from social movements critical of extractivism as a strategy to address social injustice, and is closely associated with the Andean indigenous concept of “buen vivir”, a vision of life in which the well-being of human and the rest of the natural world are considered as interrelated and pursued at the same time. Escobar refers to this third project of change as decolonial, post-liberal or transitional.

The concept of buen vivir has been incorporated in the Ecuadorian constitution in 2008, but critics of the Ecuadorian government argue that the continued pursuit of some extractive projects in this country runs counter to this vision.

According to Arturo Escobar, a solid dialogue between degrowth proponents in the North and post-extractivist social movements and intellectuals in the global South is a good way to begin addressing the global crises as long as we are aware that the answers will not be universal or immediate.

“But what degrowth proponents (who reject economic growth) must be aware of,” Escobar told IPS, “is that development is much more than growth. So it might be that the global South needs some growth, in areas such as health, education, employment, decent standards of living, if this is subordinated to the principle of buen vivir and not under the currently predominant vision of development.

“At the same time, the growth vision cannot be rejected for the North and considered acceptable for the South; the South does not need development, it does not even need sustainable development, it needs alternatives to development.”

IPS



6 Comments on "South Invited to ‘De-Grow’"

  1. Arthur on Tue, 25th Sep 2012 1:27 pm 

    This just in: Dutch government decided to switch off the lights on Dutch motorways between 21:00-05:00:

    http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/12990909/__Verlichting____s_nachts__uit__.html

    We are going to witness these kind of news messages from now on on a daily basis.

    Degrowth in action.

  2. SOS on Tue, 25th Sep 2012 4:20 pm 

    Indiginous people are no more entitled to anything than the dinosaur was. No different for me. This is a group of radical individuals essentially at war with time. They cant turn the clock back.

    The only enlightened development policy we need is an open economy providing opportunity for all. Their enlightenment is actually darkness and suffering for most.

  3. kervennic on Tue, 25th Sep 2012 9:55 pm 

    @SOS.

    You are right, they lost the battle for good and it is useless to complain.

    They made a big mistake: when the first american pioneer came: they have not slaughtered them one by one.

    Now we see the result of this big mistake : a bunch of white settlers that have killed all of them then burnt more oil than anyone else, plundered the whole planet and still consider they are entitled to more. Without them there would still be ice on the north pole in summer 2050 !

    The lesson is the following: like afghan people or iraki, you have to show no mercy to the invader, from the very start. A year after, a few familiy left and the pest is here forever !

    This is how the native treated the first white american, the greenland norse. And they never came back.

    The true enlightment is about learning lessons from history.

  4. kervennic on Tue, 25th Sep 2012 10:14 pm 

    What is an open economy ? It is an economy that has lost all its defense and is invaded.

    That is how america is leading its business agenda to “open” the economy:
    – First corrupt a few nasty top guys and help them to go to the top.
    the deal is not good enough ? then send the CIA and poison a top few other people, pay the mob to make a mess.

    Still no deal ? Let’s send the marines !

    Open economy is an opportunity for big multinational and american cartel,

    For the other it is about getting unemployed and poor and loosing all form of property.

  5. Arthur on Tue, 25th Sep 2012 10:39 pm 

    An ‘open economy’ is the pipe dream of the globalists and the world traders, but that’s a thing of the past. The future in a resource depleted world will be without the ‘progress’ paradigm, but instead ethnocentric, paternalistic, identitarian, even archaic. In short, everything modern society rejected. Sense of community will return, probably even a revival of the church, individualism will be on the backburner; their will be more hierarchies.

  6. Kenz300 on Wed, 26th Sep 2012 2:07 pm 

    Every country needs to develop a plan to balance its population with its resources, food, water, energy and jobs.

    Those that do not will be trying to export their people and their problems.

    Endless population growth is the elephant in the room. It makes every problem harder to solve and increases the poverty, suffering and despair of billions of people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *