Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on November 19, 2010

Bookmark and Share

Running on empty

Running on empty thumbnail

Even optimistic studies conclude that conventional oil production has peaked, and unconventional petroleum sources are not a viable option

The implications of the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) new report, World Energy Outlook 2010, are stark. Its 25-year “New Policies Scenario” projects it is most probable that conventional crude oil production “never regains its all-time peak of 70 million barrels per day reached in 2006.” In this scenario, crude oil production is most likely to stay on a plateau of around 68 million to 69 million barrels per day.

There you have it. We are now, in all likelihood, living in a “post-peak” world.

The IEA blames a number of factors for this: a combination of supply constraints due to below-ground geological resource limits, above-ground factors such as political obstacles to fully exploiting existing reserves (such as in Iraq) and international commitments to reducing fossil-fuel emissions to meet climate targets.

Is this the end of industrial civilization as we know it? The IEA insists: not yet. Despite the peak of conventional oil production, the IEA concludes that total growth in liquid fuels from other unconventional sources – like tar sands, oil shale and natural gas liquids – will not only make up for the shortfall in crude but actually rise as high as around 99 million barrels per day until around 2035. Despite this apparent optimism – under this scenario, there are no imminent fuel shortages – we have passed a historic tipping point. In the words of IEA Chief Economist Fatih Birol, “The age of cheap oil is over.”

The problem is that unconventional sources of oil and gas are far more expensive to get out of the ground and process into usable petroleum and are environmentally problematic. This means that over the next decade, oil prices are likely to significantly increase. Driven largely by industrial growth in places like China and India, demand is projected to grow 36 percent up to 2035; at which point, the price of oil will rise beyond $200 a barrel. On the way, by around 2015, we could see price hikes above $100 a barrel.

Unfortunately, a large body of independent scientific literature suggests the IEA’s favored scenario is far too optimistic on a whole range of issues. The agency forecasts, for instance, that Iraq will be able to triple its production by 2035 and that Saudi Arabia’s production will double. Yet this looks rather unlikely. IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, a leading energy consultancy firm vehemently opposed to the idea of peak oil, nevertheless projects the most we can hope is for Iraq to increase its output to 6.5 million barrels per day by 2020 – half of Iraq’s actual target.

As for Saudi Arabia, the late energy investment analyst Matthew Simmons concluded in his extensive book, Twilight in the Desert (2005), that the Saudi oil fields are largely in decline.

“Today, the entire field still contains a great deal of crude oil,” reports U.S. energy consultant Michael Lynch of Gerson Lehrman Group, referring to the Saudis’ most prized field, Ghawar, which is responsible for 6 percent of the world’s oil supplies. “But it is much harder to get, and the production rates continue to fall off.”

Lynch characterizes Ghawar as “largely depleted.”

The IEA’s hopes that unconventional oil and gas could rise rapidly to meet expected demand may also be misplaced.

“If conventional oil production is at peak production, then projected unconventional oil production cannot mitigate peaking of conventional oil alone,” concluded a study by University of Newcastle chemical engineer Steve Mohr, published in Energy Policy.

A Boston University study concurred, finding that the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) – the energy you get out compared to what you put in – is simply infinitesimal, at around 1:1 or 2:1, compared with conventional oil’s EROI at the well head of 20:1.

What about unconventional gas? Although EROI is quite high at inception, the EROI of all gas production rapidly declines as energy costs of compression and distribution to consumers is factored in. An extensive analysis by former Amoco petroleum geologist and World Oil columnist Arthur Berman, who has consulted for ExxonMobil and Total, fundamentally undermines industry forecasts for natural gas production based on shale gas inputs. He argues that actual shale gas production rates are less than half of official industry projections – this is because production decline rates at shale wells are far higher than assumed.

“Many believe that the high initial rates and cumulative production of shale plays prove their success,” Berman says. “What they miss is that production decline rates are so high that, without continuous drilling, overall production would plummet. There is no doubt that the shale gas resource is very large. The concern is that much of it is noncommercial even at price levels that are considerably higher than they are today.”

If the IEA is right about everything, we are in for a rough ride. But if, as the above suggests, the IEA is right about us passing the peak of conventional oil in 2006 but almost fanatical in its faith in the prospects for expanded production from unconventional sources, then we are in for an even rougher ride.

The “post-peak” world clearly does not imply the end of the world. But it does imply an extremely volatile one whose dynamics will be difficult to predict. It is a world not of easy abundance, but of declining – and increasingly expensive – carbon-based resources. If we are to develop sufficient resilience to the various price shocks and converging crises of the “post-peak” world, we will need to recognize they are symptomatic of an inevitable civilizational transition toward an emerging post-carbon age.

There is no time for denial. Governments and communities need to start adapting now.

Prague Post



One Comment on "Running on empty"

  1. KenZ300 on Fri, 19th Nov 2010 6:54 am 

    Quote — “There is no time for denial. Governments and communities need to start adapting now”

    —————————

    Wind, solar, geothermal and biofuels all need public and government support to ramp up production and ease the transition from PEAK OIL.

    Our economic security will depend on our ability to ramp up the speed of transition to alternative energy sources.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *