gnm wrote:King Coal is running all NG?!
Hehe sounds like you made a good call on that one.
Maybe that paradigm will go this way...
(The coal being too valuable liquefied into fuel)
coal delivery -> oil delivery -> wood/pellets delivery -> wood stripped from abandoned suburbs delivery -> no delivery (customer is dead)
-G
LoneSnark wrote:Yep, a friend of mine in PA has a coal furnace. He loves it, rediculously cheap since they deliver in his area. Even works if the power is out since he is using radiators instead of forced air. But it is a lot of work.
Tyler_JC wrote:Even with a relatively mild winter here (in southern Massachusetts), it costs well over $1000 per month to keep the house warm.
Tyler_JC wrote:Even with a relatively mild winter here (in southern Massachusetts), it costs well over $1000 per month to keep the house warm.
It's not a large house by any strech of the imagination (just a basic two story cape house of about 2200 square feet) and it is very well insulated.
But with heating oil at $3/gallon, it's become a money trap.
MarkJames wrote:The average home in Maine must be poorly insulated and/or the average furnace, boiler, boiler/tankless combo, boiler/indirect combo or boiler/outdoor-reset combo must be really oversized or very inefficient to use so much fuel per day.
If our average fuel oil customers burned that much fuel, we'd have to put more trucks on the road.
Return to Conservation & Efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests