NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins :-)


THE Iran Thread pt 4 (merged)

Discussions related to the global politics of energy use and acquisition.

An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 05 Mar 2006, 12:26:41

In today's Washington Post:

Osama bin Laden's strategy is based on the conviction that the way to bring down a superpower is to weaken its economy. We "bled Russia for 10 years until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw [from Afghanistan] in defeat," bin Laden boasted in his October 2004 videotape. "We are continuing in the same policy to make America bleed profusely to the point of bankruptcy." His logic, feasibility aside, is simple: Bring the United States to a point where it can no longer afford to preserve both its military and economic dominance. Then, as the United States loses standing in the Middle East, the jihadists can gain ground and topple regimes they view as corrupt and illegitimate, while defeating other infidels who inhabit the land of Islam.

Striking oil, which jihadists call "the provision line and the feeding to the artery of the life of the crusader's nation," is relatively easy and effective. Terrorists no longer need to come to the United States to wreak havoc here. They can hit our energy supply near the source, where they enjoy strong support on the ground.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 02:00:00

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby DesertBear2 » Sun 05 Mar 2006, 15:37:39

Also from the article-

And what about an air attack? A suicide terrorist hijacking an airplane in Kuwait or Dubai in an attempt to crash it into one of the facilities would leave the Saudis very little time to respond.


Yup. And maybe the Iranians have developed plans of their own involving missile and commando strikes to shut down Abqaig and multiple other major oil facilities that supply the West.
DesertBear2
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 02:00:00
Location: BlueRidgeVA

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby hoplite » Sun 05 Mar 2006, 20:19:09

Come come, harming Saudi production will harm Europe and Asia far more than the US... (I'm not saying we wouldnt feel it, just wouldnt be as bad) look at the numbers- the US is NOT SA's lagest customer.
User avatar
hoplite
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri 22 Oct 2004, 02:00:00

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby 0mar » Sun 05 Mar 2006, 20:52:05

hoplite wrote:Come come, harming Saudi production will harm Europe and Asia far more than the US... (I'm not saying we wouldnt feel it, just wouldnt be as bad) look at the numbers- the US is NOT SA's lagest customer.


global market
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby DesertBear2 » Sun 05 Mar 2006, 23:14:15

hoplite wrote:Come come, harming Saudi production will harm Europe and Asia far more than the US... (I'm not saying we wouldnt feel it, just wouldnt be as bad) look at the numbers- the US is NOT SA's lagest customer.

If Iran feels strongly that Bushco will launch a major attack on their country, they just may respond by attempting to set off the mother of all oil price spikes. It is common knowledge that the US economy is running mainly on hot air and inflated asset prices....and that a $150/barrel long-term oil shock will hobble the US economy and hamstring it's ME operations in a major way.
DesertBear2
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 02:00:00
Location: BlueRidgeVA

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby UIUCstudent01 » Sun 05 Mar 2006, 23:24:49

0mar wrote:
hoplite wrote:Come come, harming Saudi production will harm Europe and Asia far more than the US... (I'm not saying we wouldnt feel it, just wouldnt be as bad) look at the numbers- the US is NOT SA's lagest customer.


global market


They'd be attacking everyone?

I guess everyone owes America for protecting the oil, eh?
User avatar
UIUCstudent01
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 03:00:00

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby Corpsicle » Mon 06 Mar 2006, 07:27:57

UIUCstudent01 wrote:
0mar wrote:global market

They'd be attacking everyone?


Look up the word "fungible".
User avatar
Corpsicle
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed 25 Jan 2006, 03:00:00

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby Starvid » Mon 06 Mar 2006, 08:20:38

What people are saying is that since oil is a fungible good traded on a global market it doesn't matter what oil installation you attack as the price will rise for everyone.

If Abqaiq in Saudia Arabia is blown up Europe needs to look for oil in other places, like Venezuela, Indonesia and Africa. This will increase the price of oil from those places and everyone who buy from them will have to pay more.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 3023
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby FairMaiden » Mon 06 Mar 2006, 16:54:19

I knew there were going to be uses for keeping BL on the loose...he represents fear and vulnerablity that the US can wave over everyone's heads anytime things like wars are questioned. They'll find some way to blame "an energy Pearl Harbor" on whomever is their next target. I can't believe ppl are still listening to it...
User avatar
FairMaiden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 02:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby Kickinthegob » Tue 07 Mar 2006, 02:18:52

FairMaiden - the ppl listening to it are Americans and they have been bombarded by the Bush Admin propaganda machine, they are still in shock from the 9/11 Pearl Harbour and will accept anything at face value now. US journalists are already in the crosshairs...
The awkwardly named law
The awkwardly named law -- the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 -- expands the FBI's ability to obtain records through secret court orders. The law also gives government investigators greater authority to track e-mail and telephone communications and to eavesdrop on those conversations.

Although aimed at trapping terrorists, those provisions of the law could ensnare journalists and compromise their ability to report on the war on terrorism...

It was never a priority to capture BL for the reasons you mention, in fact...
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." - GW Bush, 3/13/02
It is way beyond hope at this point IMO, Americans are going to get another Pearl Harbour (Bush support at an all time low right now) and the media is getting strong armed into preparing them for it and guess who is going to be behind it - BL of course, with some type of Iranian twist no doubt. I will never underestimate the power of propaganda again after witnessing Americas unquestioning acceptance of 9/11 and the BL story. :?
User avatar
Kickinthegob
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 02:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby DesertBear2 » Tue 07 Mar 2006, 03:26:40

Kickinthegob wrote:I will never underestimate the power of propaganda again after witnessing Americas unquestioning acceptance of 9/11 and the BL story. :?


We are being heavily propagandized by an irresponsible administration that is determined to launch continuing military adventures. The constant drumbeat about the "Iran threat" appears to be swaying the majority of Americans. Maybe we should prepare our coastline defenses to repel the Iranian invasion fleet???

It appears that the US (and the world) are entering another period of mass insanity.
DesertBear2
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 02:00:00
Location: BlueRidgeVA

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby UIUCstudent01 » Tue 07 Mar 2006, 03:33:11

Starvid wrote:What people are saying is that since oil is a fungible good traded on a global market it doesn't matter what oil installation you attack as the price will rise for everyone.

If Abqaiq in Saudia Arabia is blown up Europe needs to look for oil in other places, like Venezuela, Indonesia and Africa. This will increase the price of oil from those places and everyone who buy from them will have to pay more.


I've just grown more cynical...

I used to think that since the price would increase that the supposed goal of attacking oil infrastructure would be spread to all countires.

But, now I'm thinking that the U.S. will be fine and other countries (Poorer countries - Zimbabwe, et al.) would actually feel the brunt of it. That's what fungible means.
User avatar
UIUCstudent01
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 03:00:00

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby MacG » Tue 07 Mar 2006, 06:03:52

FairMaiden wrote:I knew there were going to be uses for keeping BL on the loose...he represents fear and vulnerablity that the US can wave over everyone's heads anytime things like wars are questioned. They'll find some way to blame "an energy Pearl Harbor" on whomever is their next target. I can't believe ppl are still listening to it...


Pretty much my thinking. I see this as a way to morph the "war on terror" to a outspoken and direct war over oil.
User avatar
MacG
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 02:00:00

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby mekrob » Tue 07 Mar 2006, 07:35:26

UIUCstudent01 wrote:
Starvid wrote:What people are saying is that since oil is a fungible good traded on a global market it doesn't matter what oil installation you attack as the price will rise for everyone.

If Abqaiq in Saudia Arabia is blown up Europe needs to look for oil in other places, like Venezuela, Indonesia and Africa. This will increase the price of oil from those places and everyone who buy from them will have to pay more.


I've just grown more cynical...

I used to think that since the price would increase that the supposed goal of attacking oil infrastructure would be spread to all countires.

But, now I'm thinking that the U.S. will be fine and other countries (Poorer countries - Zimbabwe, et al.) would actually feel the brunt of it. That's what fungible means.


Well they would feel the brunt, the poorer nations would have to since there'd be less oil. The price would skyrocket and their invitation to the party would be cancelled. That's what has to happen to prevent 'shortages' and 'oil lines'. I'm not saying we wouldn't feel it in the US. The poor would definately feel it and would also spread up to the middle class. With the housing bubble about to collapse and rising interest rates, it's doubtful many of them can continue to life with high and/or increasing fuel prices. Rich people...you know how they'll get by.
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2410
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 03:00:00

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby clifman » Tue 07 Mar 2006, 09:42:19

DesertBear2 wrote:
Kickinthegob wrote:I will never underestimate the power of propaganda again after witnessing Americas unquestioning acceptance of 9/11 and the BL story. :?


We are being heavily propagandized by an irresponsible administration that is determined to launch continuing military adventures. The constant drumbeat about the "Iran threat" appears to be swaying the majority of Americans. Maybe we should prepare our coastline defenses to repel the Iranian invasion fleet???

It appears that the US (and the world) are entering another period of mass insanity.


Entering...? While I happen to think that our entire culture of consumption based on infinite growth on a finite planet is mad in and of itself, I agree with Kickin... we achieved a higher plane (greater depth?) of self-delusion on 9/11. Now, the accelerator is mashed to the floor, our rigid arms are locked on the steering wheel, our eyes are closed and the cliff is dead ahead.
For non-MSM news & views, I strongly recommend FSTV and LINK. Both available on DishNetwork, LINK also on DirecTV. Also Pacifica radio.
User avatar
clifman
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed 28 Sep 2005, 02:00:00
Location: Durham, NC USA

Re: An Energy Pearl Harbor?

Unread postby DesertBear2 » Tue 07 Mar 2006, 20:30:28

Now, the accelerator is mashed to the floor, our rigid arms are locked on the steering wheel, our eyes are closed and the cliff is dead ahead.


Well said....but I would guess that we haven't seen anything yet in terms of mass insanity.

When the really big oil shocks start to roll in like waves on the ocean, the spoiled temperamental US consumers will go berserk. And the GOP politicians will be prepared to take any political or military risk to achieve even the slightest positive economic growth.
DesertBear2
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 02:00:00
Location: BlueRidgeVA

THE Iran Thread pt 4 (merged)

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 26 Sep 2008, 00:39:02

bratticus wrote:Do we even need to go to war with them? Can't we just sit back? [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Iran Sinking as Groundwater Resources Disappear
By Kate Ravilious
for National Geographic News
September 22, 2008

Iran's insatiable demand for water, which is being drawn out of aquifers far faster than it can be replenished, is causing large chunks of farmland to sink and buildings to crack, according to a new study.
I just hope our oil there doesn't fall down a hole too.


If you have energy, and a coastline, you can have water. This would be one valid cause for nuclear power plants, to drive desalinization plants. Of course, a civilian nuclear program and a military program are not mutually exclusive.
User avatar
mos6507
Master
Master
 
Posts: 9505
Joined: Fri 03 Aug 2007, 02:00:00
Location: Boston Suburbs

Re: Iran Sinking as Groundwater Resources Disappear

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Fri 26 Sep 2008, 05:37:05

:razz: We should start shipping them potable water by the supertanker load. Sell it to them for say $10 per barrel. The water to oil ratio will become the new world monetary standard and the dollar will get pegged to it as well as all other world currencies.:)
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2892
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 02:00:00

Re: Iran's President Ahmadinejad Speaks at U.N.

Unread postby 3rensho » Fri 26 Sep 2008, 09:50:14

Cashmere wrote:
karras wrote:
Maddog78 wrote:I watched it for a bit but he mentioned God more often than a sleazy televangelist so I lost interest and turned the TV off.


Agreed, I almost turned it off too until he actually started talking about global issues not involving religion directly.

Also, If I'm not mistaken, I just heard Wolf Blitzer quoting Ahmadinejad as saying something like, "There are no gays in Iran".


Wolf is a Zionist who will do everything he can to make Ahmadinejad look as crazy as possible.


Ahmadinejad said this at Columbia University when asked about homosexuals in Iran. http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=4_3RUwAJ_MI
User avatar
3rensho
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 02:00:00

Re: Iran's President Ahmadinejad Speaks at U.N.

Unread postby Ming » Fri 26 Sep 2008, 10:41:18

That video was clearly manipulated by Zionists, to make that fine gentleman look like a criminal fool.

Dont buy that dirty Zionist propaganda!

Go, Cashmere!
User avatar
Ming
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 02:00:00

Next

Return to Geopolitics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests