The work needed to demonstrate the validity of the hypothesis and construct the actual prototypes is articulated in phases for a length of five years.
Yeah, I also love this idea still after I first saw it a year ago. It really is a great idea and I hope they find sponsors to build a life size one. But there are critical factors that cannot be solved IMO.
What happens when (not if) one or more of the kite strings comes down and isn't realed in quickly enough. Who's going to pick it up and what will that do for the price/MWh?
How are the strings brought to their operating height in the first place? I can imagine a way to do it but it seems time consuming and frought with risk (=costly).
How is the central wheel to be made? The artists impression in the website seems much too weak and flimsy considering the considerable dynamic and static forces that will be tugging at each spoke.
Anyway: asuming the above is solved (not likely) perhaps they should build a small-scale prototype with each of the kitestrings supported by a helium baloon. That should enable trouble-free operation despite the small size for as long as the helium is in de balloons and then you can certainly do some real-life testing of the control software and main structure. I think you could get a good idea of what's possible using a 20[m] drive wheel supported on a guide rail and using kite strings of 50[m] if you can find a suitable open space with a uniform, gentle breeze.
If I had the money I'd sponsor such a venture in no time but since I haven't got a cent to scratch my ass with (as we say in Holland) I guess not.
Nano wrote:Just getting a single kitestring up and staying in the air 24/7 with fully adjustable dynamic tension control and sporting a failsafe, non-destructive retraction system would clinch it for me, if I had the money to invest...
"Let's go fly a kite, up to the highest height,
oh let's go, fly a kite!"
Does it all boil down to the old lie: "The technology is there so there's no need to worry". Except that this touted 'technology' is always a gazilion times more expensive than it's fossil fuel equivalent every time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 218 guests