vtsnowedin wrote:There a lot of uses for oil we could reduce or eliminate as a higher priority before we reduce any agricultural fuel use. Ags. share of the average oil barrel is pretty small to begin with but other then improving Ag efficiency with yet larger tractors, cuts elsewhere should come first. First off I'd eliminate corn ethanol entirely and free up 0.2 gallons of net diesel for every gallon of ethanol we are producing now. Then I would reduce long haul trucking by sixty to ninety percent, switching the tonnage to trains and barges. Next I would reduce single driver commuting mileage by 80% and trips for shopping by 60%. Using oil to heat buildings would be curtailed either by supper insulating buildings or utilizing co-generation. Only after we have done all that and explored for other possibilities should we cut back the amount of fuel available to grow food.
. . . there is a years worth of 2k calorie meals in 8 bushels of shell corn - a bushel is going for less than $5 today. Pretty crazy to think that a year's ration costs $40, huh? (corn doesn't provide all amino acids, you need a few beans, too but they are cheaper because they don't make ethanol).
...(100 calories to the ounce, 16 oz to the pound, 56# to the bu)
PrestonSturges wrote:Farms will grow their own biodiesel, which will probably be refined in local co-ops. There is an oil crop for nearly any climate, including canola, sunflowers, and peanuts.
dolanbaker wrote:We will go a very long way down the production slope before fuel for agriculture starts to get scarce and much of the work could still be done using electric (battery) equipment.
If the price of oil was to quadruple, there would still be plenty for agriculture, public transport & bulk freight transportation, but not much for anything else though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests